+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Urban Areas (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 40, 50 fl | U/C (/showthread.php?tid=38)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - ac3r - 06-09-2021
(06-08-2021, 09:29 PM)tomh009 Wrote: The planning department has not uploaded it. Apparently it's available on request.
They don't seem to reply anyway. About two weeks ago I requested the documents for this project and got no response.
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - Votemac - 06-09-2021
also disappointed by no IG activity since March 2020
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - Lebronj23 - 06-09-2021
I emailed the city last night and they sent me this link
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/bb2db3e61bd043209c1f16d16a3ced0c/page/page_2/?data_id=dataSource_10-Planning_Applications_Active_5584%3A59%2CdataSource_12-Planning_Applications_Active_5584%3A49&draft=true&org=KitchenerGIS&views=view_5%2Cview_8%2Cview_3%2Cview_10
Although the link to the official plan doesn’t seem to be uploaded when you follow the link to supporting documents
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - ijmorlan - 06-09-2021
(06-09-2021, 10:57 AM)ac3r Wrote:(06-08-2021, 09:29 PM)tomh009 Wrote: The planning department has not uploaded it. Apparently it's available on request.
They don't seem to reply anyway. About two weeks ago I requested the documents for this project and got no response.
Anyway it’s stupid to have it available “on request” but with HTTP not being one of the accepted forms of request. There is no valid reason for a person to be required to be involved in satisfying routine public document requests in 2021.
Of course if they don’t actually give it out when an email or other format of request is received, then it’s a bit more clear what is actually going on.
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - Lebronj23 - 06-21-2021
(06-09-2021, 10:57 AM)ac3r Wrote:(06-08-2021, 09:29 PM)tomh009 Wrote: The planning department has not uploaded it. Apparently it's available on request.
They don't seem to reply anyway. About two weeks ago I requested the documents for this project and got no response.
The city sent me the document. The file is too large to let me post here but if you want a copy you can PM me and I’ll email it over
Notably :
Height of Tower B = 92m
Tower C = 100m
Tower D = 120m
Tower E - unspecified height, but looks to be hotel and not residential on top of the office ( I’m not sure if this was originally the plan) 1 floor retail. 9 floors commercial and 24 floors hotel = 34 floors and not 44 ( although I’m not good at reading these things)
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - Lebronj23 - 06-21-2021
(06-21-2021, 08:39 PM)Lebronj23 Wrote:This differs from the pictures on page 66 of this forum from not too long ago (March) So I’m not sure which one is correct(06-09-2021, 10:57 AM)ac3r Wrote: They don't seem to reply anyway. About two weeks ago I requested the documents for this project and got no response.
The city sent me the document. The file is too large to let me post here but if you want a copy you can PM me and I’ll email it over
Notably :
Height of Tower B = 92m
Tower C = 100m
Tower D = 120m
Tower E - unspecified height, but looks to be hotel and not residential on top of the office ( I’m not sure if this was originally the plan) 1 floor retail. 9 floors commercial and 24 floors hotel = 34 floors and not 44 ( although I’m not good at reading these things)
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - Votemac - 06-22-2021
Interesting that the underground parking is through the roundabout/drop-off. I thought it was going to be on the small road below building B
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - 519 - 06-22-2021
(06-22-2021, 11:18 AM)Votemac Wrote: Interesting that the underground parking is through the roundabout/drop-off. I thought it was going to be on the small road below building B
It seems that small road is leading to the parking entrance to C & D buildings.
I assume all the underground parking would be connected and you would be able to access from multiple entry/exit points.
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - ac3r - 06-22-2021
Confusing. In the presentation in March, Building E was shown to be 44 floors, but now this says 24 floors (it would be counted from the ground up...24 in total, not 24 floors on top of 10 to make 34). And now it's a hotel? The presentation talked about 5 residential towers. I wonder which one is accurate.
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - Votemac - 07-09-2021
From today (7/9/2021)
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - Votemac - 07-26-2021
(Real) Brick being installed! I'm very excited to see this (from 7/24/2021)
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - CP42 - 07-26-2021
(07-26-2021, 10:11 AM)Votemac Wrote: (Real) Brick being installed! I'm very excited to see this (from 7/24/2021)
How many recent developments have gotten this treatment as opposed to precast?
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - panamaniac - 07-26-2021
The brick is not only real, it isn’t slate grey. Praise be!
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - westwardloo - 07-26-2021
Nice to see. I am sure this is only for the first floor. Must be a mock up though. Not seeing and air/water barrier membrane installed behind that brick.
RE: Station Park (née SIXO) | 28 + 20? + 12? + ? fl | U/C - CP42 - 07-26-2021
(07-26-2021, 08:45 PM)westwardloo Wrote: Nice to see. I am sure this is only for the first floor. Must be a mock up though. Not seeing and air/water barrier membrane installed behind that brick.
Just checked out the renderings again - the brick is indeed only on the first floor.