+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: Grand River Transit (/showthread.php?tid=13)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 12-17-2021
(12-17-2021, 10:56 AM)cherrypark Wrote:(12-16-2021, 12:54 PM)KevinL Wrote: The University of Waterloo Station bus terminal will (partially) open on Jan 3; only the eastern end closest to Phillip Street will be up and running right away. Connections to Ion trains (or GO buses, which are still on Ring Road for now) will need a bit of a walk. This will also introduce the new Route 30; its only purpose is to serve the full loop of the Ring Road, which no other routes will take anymore.
https://www.grt.ca/en/about-grt/university-of-waterloo-station.aspx
The 15-30min headways for that Route 30 services are hilariously bad, considering the range it covers and being only one way around Ring Rd. I don't think there is much on the route that it serves that isn't <15min walk from the bus terminal anyways, but I guess if you time it right you might save yourself a few minutes.
It's a route that exists solely for political reasons. It isn't even an accessibility issue, as UW has accessibility services on the UW campus.
But that's only the tip of the bullshitberg that UW has pulled when it comes to transportation around campus.
RE: Grand River Transit - ac3r - 12-29-2021
The official GRT easyGO app is being discontinued on January 1st 2022 as they no longer want to provide security updates to it. They have a list of alternatives on their website: https://www.grt.ca/en/rider-information/mobile-app-update.aspx
RE: Grand River Transit - bgb_ca - 12-29-2021
(12-29-2021, 11:21 AM)ac3r Wrote: The official GRT easyGO app is being discontinued on January 1st 2022 as they no longer want to provide security updates to it. They have a list of alternatives on their website: https://www.grt.ca/en/rider-information/mobile-app-update.aspx
I was at a focus group a couple of years ago for this app, and we gave them a ton of suggestions on how to improve it. Too bad they just decided to kill it. (I understand why, it was outdated, and I stopped using it ages ago, and there are so may good alternatives out there.
What I am disappointed though is that the Transit app, which I switched to, is moving to a subscription model, and what they are asking per year is too much for the amount I actually use it. (If it was cheaper, I would not mind). I guess I will check out some of the other ones they listed.
RE: Grand River Transit - plam - 12-29-2021
(12-29-2021, 12:28 PM)bgb_ca Wrote: What I am disappointed though is that the Transit app, which I switched to, is moving to a subscription model, and what they are asking per year is too much for the amount I actually use it. (If it was cheaper, I would not mind). I guess I will check out some of the other ones they listed.
Yeah. The Transit app also welcomes cities pitching in to pay for their business model (which I think is reasonable!)
RE: Grand River Transit - ac3r - 12-29-2021
(12-29-2021, 12:28 PM)bgb_ca Wrote:(12-29-2021, 11:21 AM)ac3r Wrote: The official GRT easyGO app is being discontinued on January 1st 2022 as they no longer want to provide security updates to it. They have a list of alternatives on their website: https://www.grt.ca/en/rider-information/mobile-app-update.aspx
I was at a focus group a couple of years ago for this app, and we gave them a ton of suggestions on how to improve it. Too bad they just decided to kill it. (I understand why, it was outdated, and I stopped using it ages ago, and there are so may good alternatives out there.
What I am disappointed though is that the Transit app, which I switched to, is moving to a subscription model, and what they are asking per year is too much for the amount I actually use it. (If it was cheaper, I would not mind). I guess I will check out some of the other ones they listed.
Damn, really? That's too bad. Hopefully they learn a lesson as they are driven into irrelevance. Zero chance I pay for software that just aggregates free and crowd sourced data. libre software or bust.
RE: Grand River Transit - Bytor - 12-29-2021
(12-29-2021, 04:17 PM)ac3r Wrote: Damn, really? That's too bad. Hopefully they learn a lesson as they are driven into irrelevance. Zero chance I pay for software that just aggregates free and crowd sourced data. libre software or bust.
Do you expect developers to work full time on your F/OSS software for free? Developing quality software that is updated regularly takes a whole team working full-time jobs. I mean, you could got get the GTFS and GTFS-RT data directly yourself and just read that to try and figure out when your next bus is coming and whether it's behind or ahead of schedule. And crowd-sourced data data like how full a bus is simply doesn't exist unless there is a portal for people add that data, an that portal takes time and money to develop and run.
RE: Grand River Transit - ac3r - 12-29-2021
It's a phone app, dude. You don't need a whole team working full-time jobs unless your business model is to make money. You can still provide a good application for free if that's your goal and intention. And it can still provide a good product. Nobody pays for Linux and is the backbone of virtually everything we use by virtue of the fact it's free and open source.
Suckers pay for software and greedy bastards expect suckers to pay for it.
RE: Grand River Transit - dtkvictim - 12-29-2021
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of what free (libre) software is if you think it can't cost money. Not that this Transit app appears to be either form of free.
I once ran a popular free web application, which I like to think was a good service. But I encountered countless people with ungrateful and demanding attitudes like yours.. and guess what? Now the service doesn't exist anymore.
And saying nobody pays for Linux is a rather shallow perception. Linux is well funded between the Linux Foundation and the many massive corporations that support the foundation or otherwise contribute to Linux, and this is all still paid for by end consumers, even if indirectly.
RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 12-29-2021
Wow...just wow...as a software developer with an interest in FOSS, the attitude that it cannot be free is disturbing, and the claim that nobody pays for linux is equally misguided.
But I digress, I'm glad the easyGO app is going, I don't feel it's an area that GRT will ever provide a competitive service (I mean, they could, but I'm like, not holding my breath given the garbage that is all the rest of their software), so best leave it to better services, they should work to make other transit mapping services work better with GRT.
RE: Grand River Transit - tomh009 - 12-29-2021
(12-29-2021, 05:08 PM)ac3r Wrote: Suckers pay for software and greedy bastards expect suckers to pay for it.
Kind of like suckers pay for architecture and greedy bastards expect suckers to pay for it?
There are always some people willing to do some things for free. But most of the larger open source software are funded by either by sponsors (Apache Foundation, Linux Foundation, Apple, Google) or funded from the sales of the "non-community" editions. And most people need (and deserve) a salary for the work they do.
As to paying for software (or architecture), I like to make decisions on a case-by-case basis. I use FreeCAD because I don't need it very often. I use draw.io because I don't need the full Visio functionality. But I happily spend $100/year to get Office 365, because I feel I get good value for the money, even compared to the free options (it also gets me 5 TB of OneDrive storage).
Each one of these value decisions depends on individual needs and values, though. But I won't call someone a "sucker" just because he or she made a different decision than I did.
RE: Grand River Transit - ijmorlan - 12-29-2021
(12-29-2021, 08:24 PM)tomh009 Wrote:(12-29-2021, 05:08 PM)ac3r Wrote: Suckers pay for software and greedy bastards expect suckers to pay for it.
Kind of like suckers pay for architecture and greedy bastards expect suckers to pay for it?
Yeah, seriously, the complete plans for all buildings should be posted on the Web so if I want to build a building, I can just download a copy and build it. Those architects, wanting to get paid for each individual building. What a bunch of freeloaders!
RE: Grand River Transit - Acitta - 12-29-2021
(12-29-2021, 05:08 PM)ac3r Wrote: It's a phone app, dude. You don't need a whole team working full-time jobs unless your business model is to make money. You can still provide a good application for free if that's your goal and intention. And it can still provide a good product. Nobody pays for Linux and is the backbone of virtually everything we use by virtue of the fact it's free and open source.
Suckers pay for software and greedy bastards expect suckers to pay for it.
I hadn't heard that they were going to charge for the app so I looked it up. From their website:
"Some parts of Transit will soon require a paid subscription. It’s a big change. Here’s why we’re doing it.
Over the past decade we’ve grown from two people hacking on Transit, to a team of 60 designers, developers, data scientists, and transit wonks. Together, we make sure your app is super reliable, super fast, and super fun to use.
We spend all day talking with transit agencies to hunt down better data sources. Fixing broken transit data. Tweaking algorithms that predict when your buses and trains will show up. Designing features to make Transit ever-so-imperceptibly better.
This all takes time, money, resources."
I use this app all the time, so it may be worth paying for. However, Triplinx and Rocketman are other Canadian made options.
Over the past decade we’ve grown from two people hacking on Transit, to a team of 60 designers, developers, data scientists, and transit wonks. Together, we make sure your app is super reliable, super fast, and super fun to use.
We spend all day talking with transit agencies to hunt down better data sources. Fixing broken transit data. Tweaking algorithms that predict when your buses and trains will show up. Designing features to make Transit ever-so-imperceptibly better.
This all takes time, money, resources."
I use this app all the time, so it may be worth paying for. However, Triplinx and Rocketman are other Canadian made options.
RE: Grand River Transit - KevinL - 12-30-2021
I hadn't heard that Transit was going subscription, but I use it enough I may well pay. It's far and away the best tool for the job.
Edit: Okay, I looked over their blog. It looks like it'a a city-by-city rollout, and who knows when they'll get to us; and they will keep a free option, it just won't have as many bells and whistles (you can't plan trips far in the future or in distant cities, for example). I think most folks can live with that.
RE: Grand River Transit - Bytor - 12-30-2021
(12-29-2021, 05:08 PM)ac3r Wrote: It's a phone app, dude. You don't need a whole team working full-time jobs unless your business model is to make money. You can still provide a good application for free if that's your goal and intention. And it can still provide a good product. Nobody pays for Linux and is the backbone of virtually everything we use by virtue of the fact it's free and open source.
Linux is free because
1. There are zillions of people contributing so no individual would necessarily need to make it a full-time job
and
2. Some of those people are actually paid to do so by their employers who use Linux in their corporate systems, or perhaps foundations that pay them out of donations (usually from corporations who use it)
In group number 1, that group has massive overturn with a very small percentage being long-term contributors for whom that enjoyment sans recompense is enough. And group number 2 is the backbone of the project and is essentially that corporate money subsidising your free use. Driver work is often done by group number 2, employers of the hardware manufacturer making sure it works with something other than just Windows or OS X.
But if all you have is one person doing it, it becomes a hobby. Release are irregular. Bugs can go months or years without getting fixed if the owner doesn't feel "grabbed" by that particular problem or feels it's unimportant, unlike you. New features are whatever they think is neat instead of wanted by the users and often don't have UI/UX testing done on them and end up being annoyingly, unintuitively implemented. Or the author can just feel that it's time to move on to something different.
There's a lot of shitty F/OSS programmes out there, and the good ones are rare, and the good ones that evolve and grow and continue to do so for many years are rarer still. Admit it, every problem I've described above you've all encountered with F/OSS stuff that you've liked, plus other problems. I also bet that you've even had a couple of apps that you've found and liked, but then you realised it hasn't been maintained for two years and will probably stop working in two months when that new iOS or Android version rolls out.
(12-29-2021, 05:08 PM)ac3r Wrote: Suckers pay for software and greedy bastards expect suckers to pay for it.
No. People who appreciate the free versions of the good software that they've tried and will continue to use and who recognise the time and hard work that went into it, they will gladly pay for it so that it continues to get bug fixes, feature updates, and stays supported for a long time, whether that's through allowing a single hobbyist author to make it their full-time job, or for a corporation to see it as a positive investment
Your attitude of "do a lot of hard work for me completely freely without any recompense whatsoever" is selfish.
RE: Grand River Transit - trainspotter139 - 12-30-2021
(12-29-2021, 05:08 PM)ac3r Wrote: It's a phone app, dude. You don't need a whole team working full-time jobs unless your business model is to make money. You can still provide a good application for free if that's your goal and intention. And it can still provide a good product. Nobody pays for Linux and is the backbone of virtually everything we use by virtue of the fact it's free and open source.
Suckers pay for software and greedy bastards expect suckers to pay for it.
Assuming that it's just a phone app is very narrow-minded. Transit is not just a phone app. As an end-user the only parts you see are the phone app.
Behind the scenes, there's an extensive load-balanced backend infrastructure that:
- processes the "GO" function data that augments existing or replaces missing GTFS-RT data,
- pulls appropriate data from a replication-pooled database that caches GTFS data as you can't rely on GTFS data feeds to have 100% uptime,
- processes GTFS feeds from hundreds of transit agencies to ensure the cache is always up-to-date
- pools inputted user data to provide an approximation of crowding.
- handles integrations with bikeshare, carshare, rideshare and other integrated services.
- handles the logic of trip-planning and packaging the data in a way that the phone app can use.
- handles the backend logic of mobile payments for supported agencies and partners.
All that behind the scenes infrastructure to support the millions of active users of the app can easily cost hundreds of thousands of dollars annually just for hosting let alone maintaining and improving it. All so that your "phone app" can be snappy and responsive on a wide array of devices.