+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: Grand River Transit (/showthread.php?tid=13)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
RE: Grand River Transit - Bob_McBob - 12-19-2022
The region claims twice as many people are using the Affordable Transit Program compared to last year since they raised the extremely low income limit by 15%. I haven't seen any actual numbers for how many people are using it, how many were using the old notoriously inaccessible program, and how many slightly higher income seniors and high school kids were impacted by the change.
RE: Grand River Transit - Bob_McBob - 01-01-2023
GRT is getting a fair bit of flak on Reddit for no longer offering free rides on New Year's Eve.
RE: Grand River Transit - neonjoe - 01-01-2023
(01-01-2023, 06:06 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: GRT is getting a fair bit of flak on Reddit for no longer offering free rides on New Year's Eve.
Those trips were previously sponsored by a multinational beer company.
RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 01-01-2023
(01-01-2023, 06:54 PM)neonjoe Wrote:(01-01-2023, 06:06 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: GRT is getting a fair bit of flak on Reddit for no longer offering free rides on New Year's Eve.
Those trips were previously sponsored by a multinational beer company.
I mean...is that an excuse?
RE: Grand River Transit - ijmorlan - 01-01-2023
(01-01-2023, 09:29 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:(01-01-2023, 06:54 PM)neonjoe Wrote: Those trips were previously sponsored by a multinational beer company.
I mean...is that an excuse?
The money has to come from somewhere. Are you volunteering to contribute?
That being said, it does seem like a good policy, and as a political matter I think I’d be in favour.
RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 01-02-2023
(01-01-2023, 09:44 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(01-01-2023, 09:29 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I mean...is that an excuse?
The money has to come from somewhere. Are you volunteering to contribute?
That being said, it does seem like a good policy, and as a political matter I think I’d be in favour.
I mean...yes...in that my taxes (or at least, if I lived in the city) should pay for it.
Our government should be making these good decisions.
RE: Grand River Transit - plam - 01-04-2023
(01-02-2023, 09:41 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: I mean...yes...in that my taxes (or at least, if I lived in the city) should pay for it.
Our government should be making these good decisions.
Should be but GRT gets given a budget amount and it's kind of a zero sum game within that amount... RC should fund it.
RE: Grand River Transit - taylortbb - 01-05-2023
(01-04-2023, 10:08 PM)plam Wrote:(01-02-2023, 09:41 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: I mean...yes...in that my taxes (or at least, if I lived in the city) should pay for it.
Our government should be making these good decisions.
Should be but GRT gets given a budget amount and it's kind of a zero sum game within that amount... RC should fund it.
If GRT was operated as a transit commission, like the TTC is, then it would be as you describe. However, GRT is operated directly by the region, which comes with upsides and downsides.
As an upside, it's not really a zero sum game with the GRT budget because there is no separate GRT budget, just a regional budget. If ridership is lower than forecast that budget gap doesn't necessarily come out of the GRT budget. A promotion like free NYE fare costs the region money, but it doesn't have to come out of the GRT budget, or require coordination across two agencies (the transit commission and the municipal government).
As a downside, it's not really a zero sum game with the GRT budget because there is no separate GRT budget, just a regional budget. If ridership is higher than forecast, the budget surplus gets returned to the general regional pool, and likely not spent on transit-related things. It might even get spent on road expansion.
I've talked to senior regional staff about this situation, and they feel that it's better to keep GRT as a directly operated service for now so that route planning can be more deeply integrated with the rest of the planning department. Especially given ION construction/expansion (I last had these conversations pre-ION opening). But it does cause internal friction, as it means GRT planning and operations are somewhat separated from each other, and the feedback from one to the other isn't as good as it would be if they were under a single a transit commission, which had more autonomy to make service adjustments. My understanding is that the current structure has a single planning group, which has effectively two separate "contractors" operating their schedules, GRT bus operations and Keolis LRT operations.
RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 01-05-2023
(01-05-2023, 05:09 PM)taylortbb Wrote:(01-04-2023, 10:08 PM)plam Wrote: Should be but GRT gets given a budget amount and it's kind of a zero sum game within that amount... RC should fund it.
If GRT was operated as a transit commission, like the TTC is, then it would be as you describe. However, GRT is operated directly by the region, which comes with upsides and downsides.
As an upside, it's not really a zero sum game with the GRT budget because there is no separate GRT budget, just a regional budget. If ridership is lower than forecast that budget gap doesn't necessarily come out of the GRT budget. A promotion like free NYE fare costs the region money, but it doesn't have to come out of the GRT budget, or require coordination across two agencies (the transit commission and the municipal government).
As a downside, it's not really a zero sum game with the GRT budget because there is no separate GRT budget, just a regional budget. If ridership is higher than forecast, the budget surplus gets returned to the general regional pool, and likely not spent on transit-related things. It might even get spent on road expansion.
I've talked to senior regional staff about this situation, and they feel that it's better to keep GRT as a directly operated service for now so that route planning can be more deeply integrated with the rest of the planning department. Especially given ION construction/expansion (I last had these conversations pre-ION opening). But it does cause internal friction, as it means GRT planning and operations are somewhat separated from each other, and the feedback from one to the other isn't as good as it would be if they were under a single a transit commission, which had more autonomy to make service adjustments. My understanding is that the current structure has a single planning group, which has effectively two separate "contractors" operating their schedules, GRT bus operations and Keolis LRT operations.
Thanks for the deep insight here.
FWIW...I'm inclined to agree with staff...but I don't think GRT even maximizes it's integration with the region. I do think this is a weakness with Metrolinx...it has no relationship with MTO which means MTO infra rarely ever facilitates GO Transit buses....I guess they get bus lanes sometimes...but even signal priority seems a challenge.
RE: Grand River Transit - bravado - 01-05-2023
(01-05-2023, 05:09 PM)taylortbb Wrote:(01-04-2023, 10:08 PM)plam Wrote: Should be but GRT gets given a budget amount and it's kind of a zero sum game within that amount... RC should fund it.
If GRT was operated as a transit commission, like the TTC is, then it would be as you describe. However, GRT is operated directly by the region, which comes with upsides and downsides.
As an upside, it's not really a zero sum game with the GRT budget because there is no separate GRT budget, just a regional budget. If ridership is lower than forecast that budget gap doesn't necessarily come out of the GRT budget. A promotion like free NYE fare costs the region money, but it doesn't have to come out of the GRT budget, or require coordination across two agencies (the transit commission and the municipal government).
As a downside, it's not really a zero sum game with the GRT budget because there is no separate GRT budget, just a regional budget. If ridership is higher than forecast, the budget surplus gets returned to the general regional pool, and likely not spent on transit-related things. It might even get spent on road expansion.
I've talked to senior regional staff about this situation, and they feel that it's better to keep GRT as a directly operated service for now so that route planning can be more deeply integrated with the rest of the planning department. Especially given ION construction/expansion (I last had these conversations pre-ION opening). But it does cause internal friction, as it means GRT planning and operations are somewhat separated from each other, and the feedback from one to the other isn't as good as it would be if they were under a single a transit commission, which had more autonomy to make service adjustments. My understanding is that the current structure has a single planning group, which has effectively two separate "contractors" operating their schedules, GRT bus operations and Keolis LRT operations.
Useless complaint time: What makes me angry about this discussion/reality is that nobody is tracking the "ridership" on our roads after they get built and the infrastructure maintenance bills start to roll in. It's only a problem when not enough people don't cram into a bus and the people living on empty over-built roads get mad about the cost.
RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 01-05-2023
(01-05-2023, 07:58 PM)bravado Wrote:(01-05-2023, 05:09 PM)taylortbb Wrote: If GRT was operated as a transit commission, like the TTC is, then it would be as you describe. However, GRT is operated directly by the region, which comes with upsides and downsides.
As an upside, it's not really a zero sum game with the GRT budget because there is no separate GRT budget, just a regional budget. If ridership is lower than forecast that budget gap doesn't necessarily come out of the GRT budget. A promotion like free NYE fare costs the region money, but it doesn't have to come out of the GRT budget, or require coordination across two agencies (the transit commission and the municipal government).
As a downside, it's not really a zero sum game with the GRT budget because there is no separate GRT budget, just a regional budget. If ridership is higher than forecast, the budget surplus gets returned to the general regional pool, and likely not spent on transit-related things. It might even get spent on road expansion.
I've talked to senior regional staff about this situation, and they feel that it's better to keep GRT as a directly operated service for now so that route planning can be more deeply integrated with the rest of the planning department. Especially given ION construction/expansion (I last had these conversations pre-ION opening). But it does cause internal friction, as it means GRT planning and operations are somewhat separated from each other, and the feedback from one to the other isn't as good as it would be if they were under a single a transit commission, which had more autonomy to make service adjustments. My understanding is that the current structure has a single planning group, which has effectively two separate "contractors" operating their schedules, GRT bus operations and Keolis LRT operations.
Useless complaint time: What makes me angry about this discussion/reality is that nobody is tracking the "ridership" on our roads after they get built and the infrastructure maintenance bills start to roll in. It's only a problem when not enough people don't cram into a bus and the people living on empty over-built roads get mad about the cost.
They do track VMT....but there is never a question when there is too little, only because drivers do not pay. Only when there is too much, then it's time for more money.
But ultimately I think a lot of financial discussions miss the point. Roads cost us tons...but do you count the cost of private parking lots when you estimate the cost of roads...those are real costs incurred because of car dependence, but how do you account that?
I think the more valuable strategy is to talk holistically about the type of places we want. I always hate it when they do shitty business case analyses at Metrolinx, they are so utterly incomplete, it's basically just something you make up to justify what you want.
RE: Grand River Transit - plam - 01-06-2023
(01-05-2023, 05:09 PM)taylortbb Wrote: If GRT was operated as a transit commission, like the TTC is, then it would be as you describe. However, GRT is operated directly by the region, which comes with upsides and downsides.
Wow, that's interesting to know... huh.
RE: Grand River Transit - ac3r - 01-13-2023
Waterloo Region asked to offer free transit for children under 12, seniors: https://www.therecord.com/news/council/2023/01/10/waterloo-region-asked-to-offer-free-transit-for-children-under-12-seniors.html
RE: Grand River Transit - ac3r - 01-13-2023
(01-13-2023, 08:14 PM)ac3r Wrote: Waterloo Region asked to offer free transit for children under 12, seniors: https://www.therecord.com/news/council/2023/01/10/waterloo-region-asked-to-offer-free-transit-for-children-under-12-seniors.html
I certainly support it. And I also think the region should offer free transit to the homeless (if they can somehow prove they are...not sure how they'd do that however) rather than discounted fares. It would facilitate them with finding a job (and then getting to it), seeing family and friends who can act like social supports, going to psychiatric or social support obligations and potentially get them out of downtown to a better designed, maintained and secured (24/7 security) encampments the region is attempting to get operational. Many complained the proposals are too far away and that is very true, so maybe having free transit for them to get to ones further away and would hopefully lessen the size and number of the shanty and tent towns they've got set up.
RE: Grand River Transit - ijmorlan - 01-14-2023
(01-13-2023, 08:20 PM)ac3r Wrote:(01-13-2023, 08:14 PM)ac3r Wrote: Waterloo Region asked to offer free transit for children under 12, seniors: https://www.therecord.com/news/council/2023/01/10/waterloo-region-asked-to-offer-free-transit-for-children-under-12-seniors.html
I certainly support it. And I also think the region should offer free transit to the homeless (if they can somehow prove they are...not sure how they'd do that however) rather than discounted fares. It would facilitate them with finding a job (and then getting to it), seeing family and friends who can act like social supports, going to psychiatric or social support obligations and potentially get them out of downtown to a better designed, maintained and secured (24/7 security) encampments the region is attempting to get operational. Many complained the proposals are too far away and that is very true, so maybe having free transit for them to get to ones further away and would hopefully lessen the size and number of the shanty and tent towns they've got set up.
Of course, this would further increase the effective marginal tax rate applying to low-income people.
Also, I hope it’s obvious that you would need to design the program in such a way that one could not simply hang out on the LRT all day.