Waterloo Region Connected
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - timio - 10-30-2015

Weather forecasts for this winter tend to suggest it will be less extreme than the past few years, but you can't trust the forecast for more than a few days in advance.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 10-30-2015

(10-30-2015, 07:11 PM)Canard Wrote: As much as I don't want to post this, I'd rather it be me that breaks the bad news.  First official word that our trains are behind schedule - and so is the King Street Underpass, by a staggering 6 months.

http://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/lrt-vehicle-assembly-king-street-underpass-both-behind-schedule-1.2635924

Are we confident that Galloway is accurate with his 6-month figure?  Or is it only a guess?  It seems very long given that it's driven by only the approval process.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - DHLawrence - 10-30-2015

(10-30-2015, 05:48 PM)notmyfriends Wrote:
(10-30-2015, 01:49 AM)notmyfriends Wrote: Wasnt there a pretty document that walked through short/medium/long (pie in the sky) redevelopment plans for Hespeler road and Fairway road and other areas? Had a bunch of high rises and what not filling up the Cambridge Centre parking lot etc.

Here you go, notmyfriends, I found it!

http://issuu.com/urbanstrategiesinc/docs/cbs_issuu__jan_30__2013_?e=2859437/1511647#search

The transformation over time section starts on page 135.  Page 139 has Hespeler Road and page:

Looks like they have everything on my wishlist. I'd extend the creekside linear park up to Eagle, but one block at a time!


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 10-31-2015

Cincinnatti just took delivery yesterday of their first CAF LRV.  They even made it into a huge public event, almost a parade, even!



I really, really, really hope that the Region lets us know when our first train arrives, and they won't just sneak it in overnight so nobody notices!

(10-30-2015, 11:03 PM)BrianT Wrote: I think that you meant to say the delay at King.

I did - sorry!

(10-30-2015, 11:16 PM)tomh009 Wrote: Are we confident that Galloway is accurate with his 6-month figure?  Or is it only a guess?  It seems very long given that it's driven by only the approval process.

While they may be 6 months behind now, I suppose that doesn't mean the end is also pushed out 6 months. If they work faster (he did mention they're talking of doing a lot more winter work, now), then the end date moves up, so it actually might not be as delayed as we were just talking about. Hopefully that's the case.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 11-01-2015

Just a Sunday-morning video from you from YouTuber ErebosSan, of the first day of operations on the Tramway de Besançon, France. I can't wait for ion's first day of operations, and I really hope we have some kind of party/celebration like this!




RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - eizenstriet - 11-01-2015

(11-01-2015, 08:59 AM)Canard Wrote: Just a Sunday-morning video from you from YouTuber ErebosSan, of the first day of operations on the Tramway de Besançon, France.  I can't wait for ion's first day of operations, and I really hope we have some kind of party/celebration like this!



I watched those trains travel around Besançon for 6 minutes, and I conclude that the French have a lot to learn from us.

Everywhere they went, the trains were passing through mid-rise development. No highrises at all! How will they ever make the transit pay for itself?

And don’t get me started on those stodgy buildings. Pretty well the same old thing, kilometer after kilometer. They should pick the best five, say, of those and keep them. The rest – gone, so that a progressive city can be created, free from the fusty past. Then they might have an interesting liveable city which others might want to move to. Also, they might then actually attract some tourists!

The only possible thing we could learn from the French is who their vehicle suppliers are. We might need them.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 11-01-2015

Ignoring the sarcasm ... the traditional mid-rise cities in France have substantial population density already, it really is not comparable to the traditional downtown core in Kitchener (or most other mid-size cities in North America). And that's in spite of a population of only about 100K, roughly the same as Guelph.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Markster - 11-01-2015

It seemed odd when there was no work on the King underpass all summer long. I had assumed that work would begin in the spring, shortly after all the major closures began.

Hearing that it’s already six months behind pretty much tells me that I wasn’t wrong to think something was awry.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - BuildingScout - 11-01-2015

(11-01-2015, 09:49 AM)eizenstriet Wrote: I watched those trains travel around Besançon for 6 minutes, and I conclude that the French have a lot to learn from us.

Everywhere they went, the trains were passing through mid-rise development. No highrises at all! How will they ever make the transit pay for itself?

And don’t get me started on those stodgy buildings. Pretty well the same old thing, kilometer after kilometer. They should pick the best five, say, of those and keep them. The rest – gone, so that a progressive city can be created, free from the fusty past. Then they might have an interesting liveable city which others might want to move to. Also, they might then actually attract some tourists!

When your entire downtown is four or five stories high you do not need highrises. This is in contrast to Uptown Waterloo where buildings higher than three stories are against zoning regulations. For example, population density is three times higher in Besançon than in Kitchener.

Also one of the reasons Besançon is so much nicer is because over the centuries they have never been afraid to take down their ugly buildings while defending the nicer ones. We fail on both counts: on the one hand we let the very nice old Kitchener city hall be taken down and then we have heart attacks over Barra Castle's demolition.

I've posted plenty of pictures here of new construction for example in Strasbourg, Paris and Prague with new daring buildings smack in the middle of historical downtown. Can you imagine this ever been allowed here? The heritage committee would have a mass heart attack.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - mpd618 - 11-01-2015

(11-01-2015, 09:49 AM)eizenstriet Wrote: I watched those trains travel around Besançon for 6 minutes, and I conclude that the French have a lot to learn from us.

Everywhere they went, the trains were passing through mid-rise development. No highrises at all! How will they ever make the transit pay for itself?

And don’t get me started on those stodgy buildings. Pretty well the same old thing, kilometer after kilometer. They should pick the best five, say, of those and keep them. The rest – gone, so that a progressive city can be created, free from the fusty past. Then they might have an interesting liveable city which others might want to move to. Also, they might then actually attract some tourists!

We could learn some things from places like Besançon. Like how to construct dense urban buildings with zero parking, and not care about NIMBYs concerned with spillover parking. Like how not to consider single-family detached houses to be a viable building style right next to the central part of the city.

It goes both ways, eizenstriet. Building medium-density buildings, and doing so in a broad area, requires the kind of community buy-in that the neighbourhoods adjacent to the downtowns would make extremely hard to obtain.

Perhaps we'll see you at council advocating for less parking and less setback in new developments, so that smaller-scale development can be viable here.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 11-01-2015

The Besançon system had a bunch of park-and-ride stations, and they are expanding some of them.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - MidTowner - 11-01-2015

(11-01-2015, 02:11 PM)mpd618 Wrote: We could learn some things from places like Besançon. Like how to construct dense urban buildings with zero parking, and not care about NIMBYs concerned with spillover parking. Like how not to consider single-family detached houses to be a viable building style right next to the central part of the city.

It goes both ways, eizenstriet. Building medium-density buildings, and doing so in a broad area, requires the kind of community buy-in that the neighbourhoods adjacent to the downtowns would make extremely hard to obtain.

Perhaps we'll see you at council advocating for less parking and less setback in new developments, so that smaller-scale development can be viable here.

I agree with a lot of what you say. Out of curiosity, what entails "medium-density" to you, though? "Single-family detached housing" can be dense enough to support transit and other uses within walking distance. Actually, here in Kitchener-Waterloo, it did, and those neighbourhoods that now seem adjacent to the downtowns were streetcar suburbs with commercial mixed in, and where many people could walk to their jobs, most could take transit to their jobs, and most people did walk to do shopping and run errands. Before the car, there was no reason to set houses far back from loud, dangerous streets, and houses close to the street created the kinds of density that made these things possible. Again: it's possible to achieve a fair bit of density even with detached family homes.

Doubtless we can learn from cities of our size in Europe. It's probably not possible to emulate them, though. People have grown to want different things. In many European city centres of varying sizes, it's hard to convince someone to live in a ground floor apartment for security reasons, and the fact that they're less marketable means mixed-use (with all of its many many benefits) has come naturally. Here, most of us are still hung up on wanting a single-family-home, especially with kids. But we can make that work, too. If you're advocating for razes mass tracts of existing century homes near our downtowns to make way for miles of mid-rise development, I admit that that seems sustainable, but there might be an insufficient market for the new apartments, and a lot of the people living in those (relatively) sustainable and transit-oriented old neighbourhoods might be driven to far-flung suburbs because they feel they just have to have a (single-family detached) "home," and now none exist near the cores.

I agree 100% with your last paragraph. Less (or no) parking requirements; less setbacks. Doing that would go a long way.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - KevinL - 11-01-2015

Time for some updated shots of Benton/Charles?

Fresh concrete under those tarps!
[Image: 20151101_084525.jpg]

Molds being formed around the southbound curves.
[Image: 20151101_084557.jpg]

A curiousity here: the rebar and spacers are in separate sections and the tracks in between do not meet. I'm guessing they want to solidify these sections in concrete, then make some kind of expansion joint.
[Image: 20151101_084603.jpg]

And, from street level.
[Image: 20151101_084819.jpg]


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - eizenstriet - 11-01-2015

(11-01-2015, 02:11 PM)Good, you’re up-front, which enables real discussion: Wrote: mpd618
We could learn ... how not to consider single-family detached houses to be a viable building style right next to the central part of the city.

Lots of those houses you’re speaking of have been “viable” right next to the central part of the city for a century or so. The successive owners have built admirable communities, and aren’t about to surrender their investments, their roots, and their faculties of critical thinking just because you in your own interests would like to label them “unviable”.


We could learn ... to... not care about NIMBYs concerned with spillover parking.

You seem now to be acknowledging that there will be “spillover parking”. So can we now lighten up on the warranty that high density near transit will not have parking demand? I mean, you know that a single-family detached house behind The Red has had its “BY” become a parking lot for that building. You know that people may contend with 144 Park or the Kaufman Lofts because there is not provision for their second cars. You know that residents of The Bauer Lofts complain of inadequate visitor parking. So let’s grant that “NIMBYs” are not always just paranoid, and that they may dare to suggest that development be prepared to sustain its own attachment to the automobile.


Building medium-density buildings, and doing so in a broad area, requires the kind of community buy-in that the neighbourhoods adjacent to the downtowns would make extremely hard to obtain.

Within my own immediate area, I do not recall any notable opposition to The Red, The 42, 133 Park, 144 Park, the Cortes on King, The Bauer Lofts, The Seagram Lofts, BPR Lofts, Princess Condominiums, the Silver Thread Lofts, Cripple Creek, the St. Louis School Lofts, The Barrelyards, or The Grand. These honour to an arguable extent the transition zone principle with – dare I say it – viable single-family detached neighbourhoods. Even 133 Caroline had as much opposition from dispersed users of the Iron Horse Trail as from “NIMBYs”.


And while we’re at it, can we acknowledge the reflexive “NIMBY” appellation for what it is – like all derogatory epithets, a device to short-circuit discussion - ? People quite naturally try to protect what they deem valuable, what they have saved for, what they have risked for, what they have raised their children in, what they have created which is satisfying. Are they really any less worthy of engagement than those who oppose re-aligning The Iron Horse Trail?



RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - eizenstriet - 11-02-2015

(11-01-2015, 01:33 PM)BuildingScout Wrote: BuildingScout
Also one of the reasons Besançon is so much nicer is because over the centuries they have never been afraid to take down their ugly buildings while defending the nicer ones.

I’d be very surprised if Besançon was a free-and-easy demolition town. France must be one of the most rigorous preservers of architectural heritage on the face of the Earth. And not only does it mandate conservation. A family whose modern (but “compatible”) home I stayed in near St. Malo was describing to me how it took 3 successive building plans to satisfy local authorities that their design would not disrupt the character of the surrounding historic structures.


We fail on both counts: on the one hand we let the very nice old Kitchener city hall be taken down and then we have heart attacks over Barra Castle's demolition.

These two straw man examples on the far ends of the spectrum beg the question. Serious initiative regarding the ones in between is the issue.


I've posted plenty of pictures here of new construction for example in Strasbourg, Paris and Prague with new daring buildings smack in the middle of historical downtown. Can you imagine this ever been allowed here? The heritage committee would have a mass heart attack.

I am hard-pressed to recall “the heritage committee” here objecting to daring buildings smack anywhere. I do recall many instances of objection to removal of the “historical”. Where on the spectrum lies the appropriate resistance to demolition is the real issue. Juxtaposition of the old and the “new daring” can be stimulating – see the area of The High Line in Manhattan – as long as there is enough of each. And both the locals and the touristic public seem to find a well-conserved place like Besançon appealing. Thus my admittedly facetious commentary on the Besançon train tour.