Waterloo Region Connected
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 05-28-2016

(05-27-2016, 11:41 PM)GtwoK Wrote: I don't have any good photos (it's 11:30pm, and the flash on my phone isn't helping), but Water has been completely repaved and painted. Sidewalks are also in on the south side of Duke between Water and Francis, and are in the middle of being built on the North side. Also: LRT curbs are going in on this same stretch! The track crossing at Water may not be going in during this closure, but it seems track might be laid along Duke and then down Francis first. I'm thinking, considering the Francis closure only took maybe 3 weeks with catpole foundations going in almost immediately, there must not have been any utilities running along Francis. Would've sped things up quite a bit! Looking forward to seeing these done, maybe even withing the next few weeks.

Could it be that the utilities are right down the centre? So, since the track is off to the side here, perhaps they didn't need to be relocated.

Here are some photos from this past week, looking down King from between Kitchener and Waterloo:

   

   

   


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 05-28-2016

   
Work progresses on the trackwork at the intersection of Caroline and Allen.

   

   

   
Preparing the foundation for a TPSS, which will be installed on June 23.



RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 05-28-2016

Facebook reminded me what the corridor through Waterloo Park looked like when I took this first photo 4 years ago.

   

Here it is today:

   

I am sad we lost all those trees.  While it's going to be great seeing trains fly through here, the math of -Trees and +Fence aren't quite what I had hoped for, from an aesthetic outcome standpoint.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 05-28-2016

Earlier this morning, near Charles & Stirling:


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tvot - 05-28-2016

(05-28-2016, 07:42 AM)Canard Wrote: I am sad we lost all those trees.  While it's going to be great seeing trains fly through here, the math of -Trees and +Fence aren't quite what I had hoped for, from an aesthetic outcome standpoint.

Yeah. It seems like improving those fences is a lost cause for now. For Waterloo Park, maybe it can be brought up repeatedly in their promenade discussions, not sure how to approach getting rid of it on other parts of the route.

About the cut down trees on the non-path side, I always see plenty of vehicles parked or working back there, but I have no idea what they are doing back there. Does anyone know? It looks like the tracks, bridge, etc. are all close to done in that area and they did sewer & comms a few years ago in that area, so I'm not sure what else needs to be done. There are no plans to leave that area accessible as far as I can tell.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - KevinL - 05-28-2016

A TPSS is going in there, and an access path across the tracks will be built. I don't think public access is intended, no.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Pheidippides - 05-28-2016

Miss a few days and so much to catch up on!

First, I have seen in various articles that the maximum penalty Bombardier is liable for is $3.3 million. My question is, is that per LRV or total for all 14? Capping it $3.3 million total seems like a pretty modest incentive. I think based on the revised, revised, schedule they would owe nearly $5 million without a cap:
   

Second, as for the location of the TPSS in Waterloo Park, it seems to be asking for trouble to be building something electrical in nature on a flood plain (one that floods quite regularly even with a heavy summer storm). That said it does look like they are taking additional precautions compared to the other TPSS’s installed to date.

Third, something doesn’t seem completely transparent about the latest delay from Bombardier. They have a good history of innovative and quality products, but are definitely having a tough time delivering on their promises at the moment. According to media reports everything was fine as May 13 and then suddenly as of May 19 there are new and unexpected and considerable delays. How could they not see a delay of this magnitude one week out?

Fourth, I saw that quote from Councillor Galloway in The Record saying construction as being behind schedule, but CTV quoted him as saying no construction delays are expected. So one of them got it wrong. If I had to guess I think what he probably said was there are certain areas of construction that are behind schedule (e.g. King/Victoria underpass), but that they expect to get caught up by the construction deadline.

Fifth, is there a publicly accessibly list of who is currently in Bombardier’s queue for each factory and where our vehicles are in that queue?

Finally, perhaps Bombardier could send some pallets for us to use as personal rapid transit until our LRVs are ready:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Wfuvysl-UI


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - timc - 05-28-2016

(05-28-2016, 05:31 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: Third, something doesn’t seem completely transparent about the latest delay from Bombardier. They have a good history of innovative and quality products, but are definitely having a tough time delivering on their promises at the moment. According to media reports everything was fine as May 13 and then suddenly as of May 19 there are new and unexpected and considerable delays. How could they not see a delay of this magnitude one week out?

If I read things correctly, there was a change in management before the May 13 report came out. I work in the software world, not hardware, but if I had to guess, they put out a preliminary warning and then had a week of meetings to assess where things really are and came up with the new timeline. If that is the case, then the new dates may be more trustworthy than we have had up until now. But it comes down to how well the project management team can get things together and deliver on their promises.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - dunkalunk - 05-28-2016

Had to stop by Henry's for a camera bag. Took some photos with the camera on the way back to the terminal...
(click-through for Flickr album)

[Image: 27314102335_3885e9a5f1_c.jpg]
King and Northfield: mostly-graded

[Image: 27280889076_3f2847eeac_b.jpg]
Quick and dirty in-camera panorama (bonus truncated vehicles)


[Image: 27314106145_228bdd2415_c.jpg]
The TPSS is big, grey and imposing. I personally think it needs more bears, or some other sort of colourful mural.

[Image: 27280887756_5a2c81aaa3_c.jpg]
Piles of asphalt, aggregate, dirt, and jackhammered sidewalk make the bus entrance to Conestoga Mall impassable for busses. Stairs to platform look almost ready to be poured.

[Image: 27314104285_683c61e7aa_c.jpg]
A view from the endzone Conestoga Station platform. TPSS still needs more bears.

[Image: 27216899812_213c169bcd_c.jpg]
Construction hasn't yet uprooted this landscaping. Bonus points if you can tell me what kind of shrubbery this is.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - panamaniac - 05-28-2016

Bridle Wreath, a type of spirea, no?


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Markster - 05-28-2016

There is light at the end of the Queen/Charles tunnel!

They've laid a lot of the communication ducts, and soon it will be time to fill in the hole and tamp the earth, and then finally curbs, the station platform, and then finally the rails and road!




RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 05-28-2016

Today, I toured the TTC's brand new Leslie Barns facility, which is home to their new fleet of Bombardier FLEXITY Outlook LFLRV's. I've posted some photos in the Toronto Transit Projects thread.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 05-28-2016

(05-28-2016, 05:31 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: First, I have seen in various articles that the maximum penalty Bombardier is liable for is $3.3 million. My question is, is that per LRV or total for all 14? Capping it $3.3 million total seems like a pretty modest incentive. I think based on the revised, revised, schedule they would owe nearly $5 million without a cap:

Your calculation assumes that the penalties kick in the day after the originally projected delivery date.  We haven't seen the contract, so we don't know whether this is actually the case.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 05-29-2016

Can I nerd out and talk about fixed-bogie articulation for a moment? Smile

   

This is a bogie, or "truck" from Toronto's new fleet of FLEXITY Outlook LRV's - substantially similar enough to our trains (FLEXITY Freedom) for sake of discussion. It's the frame that holds the wheels and motors - one motor per axle. You can see the motor and gear reducer on the left for the axle in the foreground; the motor for the rear axle is on the right, rotated 180 degrees. The disc brake assembly is on the far side of the near axle.

I was very happy to finally get to see a bogie out on its own like this, because I finally answered some of my own questions about how exactly the articulation is accomplished between modules on the FLEXITY series of trams.

These trains are a configuration known as "fixed bogie". Unlike the older Toronto fleet (called CLRV and ALRV's), where each bogie can turn under the car, these bogies are "fixed" with respect to the car (or module) that they are attached to. On the 5-module trains, modules A, C and E have bogies, and modules B and D are suspended between them.

So, the orientation in free space of module A, C and E is defined by the position of the bogie, which is tangent to the line drawn between the two axles on each bogie (ok, ever so slightly inboard, if you want to get picky!). The modules in between fall in line since they have an articulation point (hinge) fore and aft.

So that's fine for horizontal curves, and everything works great - but, in real life, you also have to deal with vertical curves, and even compound curves with twisting (roll), too. Think of the transition of Southbound track through Charles/Benton - this is a particularly aggressive section of track.

I have learned through watching the operation of the new TTC LRV's that the train is actually configured as such: Module A-B-C have only yaw between them, and module D-E can yaw, and then there's a full 3-axis articulation between C and D. So it's as if they've taken a 3-module train and put a 2-module trailer on it.

Again, this is all great... But any roll has to be taken up - and that's where my discovery yesterday was made. The modules sit on the bogies on four coil springs, which you can see in this photo. Just outside of them are four metal discs with a urethane element behind them - In the automation industry, we'd call this configuration a moment compensator. Essentially, it allows the module to bounce up and down, roll left and right, pitch forward and back... But inhibits yaw, which is exactly what we need - since yaw is what we need to fully define the orientation of each module relative to the track!

As a kinematic system, it all works out. This has been bothering me for 2+ years and I've never been able to get a straight answer out of anyone on how exactly is set up, so I was overjoyed to be able to finally crack the nut, so to speak!


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 05-29-2016

Just one photo from me for the weekend here in town:  Ballasted track is going in now along the Hydro Right-of-Way parallel to Fairway Road.

   

I'm very curious how, and when, they'll tamp (align) this track. All tamping so far has been done on track which is either connected to or replacing existing rail lines, so moving the tamping and blasting equipment to the location of the track has been easy. Here, the track is isolated - separated from the main railway line it eventually connects to by embedded track, with three very tight radii turns. The Harsco Mark IV tamper surely can't navigate those curves (it has fixed axles on a very long frame), so I'm quite curious how they plan on doing maintenance on this section of track in the long term.

Also, here's a great little video clip from Matt Morris on Twitter, showing how they're doing the embedded track when the rapidway runs down the centre, and the concrete between the rails is lower to make room for the flanges.  Neat custom device!