ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
|
RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 08-28-2016 Didn't we have this exact discussion several years ago? Elmira is not Waterloo Region's Scarborough. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - DKsan - 08-28-2016 (08-28-2016, 09:37 PM)Canard Wrote: Didn't we have this exact discussion several years ago?Right. That's Cambridge. I'M KIDDING. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - MacBerry - 08-28-2016 (08-26-2016, 03:35 PM)Markster Wrote: To no one's surprise, the railway bridge at Waterloo Park is already attracting art: We need those no paint station panels here RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - timc - 08-28-2016 (08-27-2016, 03:31 PM)Canard Wrote: This, unfortunately, is what the entrance to the R+T Park station is now going to look like. I think it's absolutely terrible. Those fences have got to go, and look like garbage. C'mon![/i] Unfortunately, this station looks more approachable from Phillip Street than it does from the R&T Park. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - zanate - 08-29-2016 (08-28-2016, 07:19 PM)BuildingScout Wrote:(08-28-2016, 03:36 PM)Elmira Guy Wrote: Charging fees to the townships for services they do not benefit from is absurd. And this is why the ultimate answer to this kind of question is always a political one. Because when you put your cases like that, you're both right, but you both can't be right. Which argument seems more right depends on where your audience's interests lie. Look at Hamilton, which doesn't just differentiate between rural and urban areas when taxing for transit, but divides it up by ward. The result becomes a severe obstinance against expanding transit into areas that don't pay for it, because of this level of micro-targeting. Which means that Hamilton has yet one more pressure that forces people to drive. That results in an artificial easiness in growing the road network compared to providing any alternative. So, area rating for transit is bad. But conversely, it doesn't make sense to most people to tax a small town outside of the KCW metro area to fund transit that doesn't serve it. And transit service out to places like Elmira and other towns has been funded on a per-route basis. (And still faces opposition on that account too.) So, area rating for transit makes sense, I guess? It might be a different conversation if people understood that a new subdivision in Wilmot, for example, is housing a few hundred people who are primarily driving into KW to work and to shop, and this places pressure on our connecting regional roads, as well as the need for street capacity and parking room in the city. If that subdivision was a denser development in an urban area connected by good transit, the pressure on roads around and in KW would be reduced. So there's an argument that in lieu of paying for transit, there should be an additional road transportation levy. Or maybe we should stop talking about paying for one type of transportation here, and one type there, we should talk about paying for any transportation across this region as a whole. But we're not, because politics. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 08-29-2016 (08-28-2016, 11:18 PM)timc Wrote: Unfortunately, this station looks more approachable from Phillip Street than it does from the R&T Park. ...which isn't hard to imagine. The access from Philip was an afterthought by the Region, and they purchased a sliver of land to be able to do so. Meanwhile, the "stock" entrance off of Wes Graham Way/the Laurel Trail is done by the Consortium, who, unless specified otherwise, will have no impetus to do anything beyond the bare minimum as far as effort goes - and why would they? To be perfectly clear, I am not faulting anyone over this: I just want attention brought to it, so it can be cleaned up. Here are a couple more photos of the area. Maybe it'll look great with a nice curving concrete path, and a bunch of trees/bushes hiding the fence? Right now though it just screams "Welcome to Prison Camp". Not very inviting at all. "HOSTILE TO PEDESTRIANS!!!!", even! :: horrors :: I'll dig and see if I can find out any more info. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - nms - 08-29-2016 Quote:From the article: Larry Masseo is on the board of directors for the Waterloo Region Home Builders’ Association: “I suppose I would look at it as a broader perspective. You could say that you don’t use parks, or I don’t use schools, why should I pay?” he said.“It is half my taxes right there. I think from a broader policy perspective, if the transit cost is spread out over everybody, everyone in the township still has access to use that transit should they need to, whether they are visiting the city, or one of the many who live in the townships, and work in the city, so it will impact them from that perspective.” According to the article, it isn't new taxes that are being considered but rather boosting the development charge for new construction. It may be the thin edge of the wedge towards an amalgamated transit/transportation fee that is Region wide (along the lines of the same way that everyone in the Region pays for policing or the airport). Conveniently, charging development charges allows politicians to have their cake and eat it too. No, the existing taxpayers of the Townships (assuming that they don't move into a new build), will not be paying for the LRT; but Yes, the Townships will be paying for the LRT in an indirect way. The transit discussion is far from over as the concept of funding transit out to outlying areas. Maybe, once the LRT is running, and once the Region has rationalized the existing KWC GRT bus routes, then the Region can begin to look in earnest at connections to the outlying areas. I'm sure that a two-way St. Jacobs Market-Heidelberg-St. Clements-Hawkesville-Wallenstein-Elmira-St. Jacobs loop would be quite welcome for people living in Wellesley and Woolwich. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 08-29-2016 (08-29-2016, 01:09 PM)nms Wrote:Quote:From the article: Larry Masseo is on the board of directors for the Waterloo Region Home Builders’ Association: “I suppose I would look at it as a broader perspective. You could say that you don’t use parks, or I don’t use schools, why should I pay?” he said.“It is half my taxes right there. I think from a broader policy perspective, if the transit cost is spread out over everybody, everyone in the township still has access to use that transit should they need to, whether they are visiting the city, or one of the many who live in the townships, and work in the city, so it will impact them from that perspective.” With "half my taxes", Masseo is referring to parks and schools (which he doesn't use), not transit. That said, given that one of the leaders of the local home builders' association doesn't see a major problem with the idea of the incremental development fee to support transit, maybe this would not be such a huge crisis as the Observer paints. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Markster - 08-29-2016 Hey, so I was on the radio last week! If you missed it, and want to listen, I posted my part (as well as a Tom Galloway bit from earlier spliced in) to YouTube. It also features a bunch of supporting imagery. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 08-29-2016 (08-29-2016, 05:00 PM)Markster Wrote: Hey, so I was on the radio last week! Finally got to listen through your interview, it was a really good interview, you definitely seemed to get your point across. I did find a few things interesting, regarding my own pet peeve on this particular issue, which is in my opinion, the *real* problem is that the area was never designed to be walkable. I think Tom Galloway touched on this when he said there weren't formal paths. And you kind of implied it when you said it was surprisingly walkable. If the paths had been formal paths from the beginning, then crossings would have probably been included in the design. But since walkability i.e., the concept of walking from the neighbourhood to the businesses was never built for (I imagine, never even considered), these paths don't exist. The fact that the hydro corridor with the recreational trail and few/no/with holes fences prevented it, merely meant that walkability was a happy accident for residents. This might be a problem affecting Traynor right now, but the general problem affects many neighbourhoods like Traynor across the region. Specifically, even places that could be walkable, aren't. Designs seem to, and indeed do, go out of its way to prevent walkability. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jwilliamson - 08-30-2016 The crossing at Father David Bauer has been covered in a layer of a fine aggregate, making it much easier to ride across. The frame for the wall was in place at R&T Park, and they were hoisting in the uprights this morning. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 08-30-2016 You mean the completed crossing at FDB/Caroline is now covered in gravel? Why? RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 08-30-2016 Not much progress to report on Charles this morning (although the work crews, absent yesterday morning, were back). So I'll have to settle for a dawn picture of the tracks near Borden: RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Elmira Guy - 08-30-2016 @ BuildingScout So if you believe that residents of the townships should be subject to all the same fees as urban residents but should not expect or receive the same services for said fees, how far does this extend in your mind? Do you also support the removal of waste transfer stations from the townships, telling residents you must now drive into the city to get rid of yard waste and such? If you think they're all going to do so, they ain't. And your argument that my point about residents having tp pay for transit while not receiving (and won't in my lifetime) is akin to someone saying I shouldn't have to pay taxes towards education because I don't have kids is not quite analogous. I think the dynamics change somewhat when switching from the microeconomics of one to that of a whole community. I cannot think of any service that residents of the townships receive from the region that urban residents do not, yet the reverse is true in the two issues being discussed here. Unless of course you think issues facing residents of the township should be considered less important than those facing urban residents. Not saying you are but it would not be the first time I (and I'm certain others who grew up or spent a lot of time living in the townships) I have encountered that sentiment. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Pheidippides - 08-30-2016 Some progress to report in uptown: At Erb and Caroline staking for the outer curb is in place on the south west corner. Also, pieces of track were being moved around closer to their final resting spots. At King and Allen the short stretch on the southbound track between the Allen curve and the Allen station is now poured. Track is now welded and mostly booted, but still on wooden blocks, all the way to William (previously ended at George). Also, a lot of the advertising on the orange construction fence was coming down; not sure if that is a precursor to the fence moving or coming down - would seem early for that. |