Waterloo Region Connected
General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (http://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (http://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Downtowns (http://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours (/showthread.php?tid=8)



RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - rangersfan - 09-18-2018

artembunglito thanks for posting those pictures. This is the first time I have seen any image of the Manulife project. The artist shows almost that whole block getting filled up.

Also the transit hub images I assume must be just concepts at this stage and not the actual project?


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Spokes - 09-18-2018

I wish there were digital versions of this floating around


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Lens - 09-18-2018

King and Wellington render from the "ION Attracts" map.
[Image: KingandWellington.png]
And one from ABA Architects from a few years ago:
[Image: 2013-077-2013.09.jpg]



RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Spokes - 09-18-2018

Hmmm so that's still alive? Interesting

Is there a PDF somewhere of ION attracts?


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Square - 09-18-2018

(09-18-2018, 04:26 PM)Spokes Wrote: Hmmm so that's still alive?  Interesting

Is there a PDF somewhere of ION attracts?

No PDF, but here is the web link : https://rmw.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapTour/index.html?appid=9d7a3040fc104f7ca6ecae1c0b0aabec


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Spokes - 09-18-2018

Thanks!!


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - rangersfan - 09-19-2018

It's interesting that the Ion Attracts map does not list Virerra Village project.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - neonjoe - 09-19-2018

#86 is vierra village


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - clasher - 09-25-2018

Demolition denied for 254 and 262 Queen. Kind of a shame I think... those houses aren't all that special and I imagine they will now just be left to degrade until demolition is needed due to safety concerns.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Spokes - 09-25-2018

My goodness. Not special at all.

Are there occupants in them right now?


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - clasher - 09-25-2018

I don't think anyone is in either of them, one of them used to be a travel agent but I don't remember what the other way.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 09-25-2018

(09-25-2018, 01:58 PM)clasher Wrote: Demolition denied for 254 and 262 Queen. Kind of a shame I think... those houses aren't all that special and I imagine they will now just be left to degrade until demolition is needed due to safety concerns.

There were 16 (!) delegations speaking on this. Not all opposed, but many were. I left just before 10 PM, I think the meeting didn't finish until 1 AM.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - KevinL - 09-25-2018

Quote:The vote came almost a year after council reluctantly approved the demolition of two heritage homes further down Queen Street, next to the Schneider Haus National Historic Site.

Mario Chilanski, who lives in the Victoria Park heritage district, reminded council of that earlier vote, quoting councillors' comments from October 2017 when council insisted that the demolition of the homes next to Schneider Haus would not create a precedent or send a signal that the Victoria Park district was open for demolition.
It still doesn't send that signal. These are at the edge of the district, surrounded by very different forms that are mostly much newer. They're not about to bulldoze half the neighbourhood or anything.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - JoeKW - 09-25-2018

This close to an election there's not much be gained by approving this and a lot to lose...


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 09-25-2018

(09-25-2018, 03:27 PM)KevinL Wrote:
Quote:The vote came almost a year after council reluctantly approved the demolition of two heritage homes further down Queen Street, next to the Schneider Haus National Historic Site.

Mario Chilanski, who lives in the Victoria Park heritage district, reminded council of that earlier vote, quoting councillors' comments from October 2017 when council insisted that the demolition of the homes next to Schneider Haus would not create a precedent or send a signal that the Victoria Park district was open for demolition.

It still doesn't send that signal. These are at the edge of the district, surrounded by very different forms that are mostly much newer. They're not about to bulldoze half the neighbourhood or anything.

It's two isolated old (not historic IMO) houses, not part of a neighbourhood, in the Queen St S corridor, which has specifically been designated for intensification. But Chilanski said he had spent hours and hours reviewing the previous meeting's video footage, and spent probably half his allotted time admonishing councillors to vote against this proposal, based on their previous comments.

Sadly I can only vote for one councillor and I'm not optimistic that we'll see a big change in the council composition after the election.

Incidentally, earlier in the meeting, it took over 30 minutes to approve the removal of five parking spots on safety grounds. And another thirty minutes to approve two blocks' worth of sidewalk, over more resident objections.