12-05-2016, 01:28 PM
(12-05-2016, 01:11 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(12-05-2016, 12:13 PM)panamaniac Wrote: Just to note that the implication in the AudGen's report is the same as that in the report:
http://www.auditor.on.ca/en/content/annu...09en16.pdf
" ... Metrolinx terminated a contract with another poorly performing contractor, paid it almost the full amount, and then re-hired it for another contract. Metrolinx hired the same contractor for Phase 2 of a project to install external cladding (cover) for a pedestrian bridge over Highway 401 even though the contractor had performed extremely poorly on Phase 1. ... "
Thanks for taking the time to read the actual source document ;-)
No problem. After my 4th coffee, I was feeling slightly manic this morning.