10-16-2017, 12:36 PM
Of course, there is always the "Twelve Angry Men" approach: "At the beginning, they have a nearly unanimous decision of guilty, with a single dissenter of not guilty, who throughout the play sows a seed of reasonable doubt."
Automatically pigeon-holing any dissenter (or supporter for that matter) into one group or another does a disservice the debate in general.
Automatically pigeon-holing any dissenter (or supporter for that matter) into one group or another does a disservice the debate in general.