Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 15 Vote(s) - 3.93 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit
(05-31-2018, 04:38 PM)trainspotter139 Wrote:
(05-31-2018, 03:53 PM)jeffster Wrote: Serious question: Is $62,000 - $65,000 a good pay for this?

1) You're dealing with members of the public.
2) By the looks of it, you might be getting physical with certain members of the public that need help getting on and off LRT.
3) RRSP -- no DB pension.
4) Shift premium? It doesn't mention it. I'm guessing this is the reason for the range? Or is $62-$65,000 because of "steps". As in, $62,000 Step 1, $63,000 Step 2....etc

I ask this, because, GRT drivers probably make close to the same, do the same type of work, but; they have OMERS.  There would also be shift premium for afternoons/evening work and weekend work.

It's competitive. Those are just starting wage rates I would assume. I would also assume there are a number of benefits that aren't defined there.

If even 10% of the applicants are qualified, they are offering too much. ECON 101. Of course, they might not be offering very much too much — it’s not always obvious what price is enough to get enough supply of something.
Reply


(05-31-2018, 06:05 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(05-31-2018, 04:38 PM)trainspotter139 Wrote: It's competitive. Those are just starting wage rates I would assume. I would also assume there are a number of benefits that aren't defined there.

If even 10% of the applicants are qualified, they are offering too much. ECON 101. Of course, they might not be offering very much too much — it’s not always obvious what price is enough to get enough supply of something.

They aren't offering too much. This is a competitive rate for LRV operators when you compare other systems. TTC drivers start at $25/hr for the first 12 months rising to $32/hour after 24 months. $62,000-$65,000 is well within the salary range that is competitive with other transit agencies.
Reply
(05-31-2018, 06:05 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(05-31-2018, 04:38 PM)trainspotter139 Wrote: It's competitive. Those are just starting wage rates I would assume. I would also assume there are a number of benefits that aren't defined there.

If even 10% of the applicants are qualified, they are offering too much. ECON 101. Of course, they might not be offering very much too much — it’s not always obvious what price is enough to get enough supply of something.

This statement is the problem with pure corporate capitalism.
Reply
(05-31-2018, 06:44 PM)trainspotter139 Wrote:
(05-31-2018, 06:05 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: If even 10% of the applicants are qualified, they are offering too much. ECON 101. Of course, they might not be offering very much too much — it’s not always obvious what price is enough to get enough supply of something.

They aren't offering too much. This is a competitive rate for LRV operators when you compare other systems. TTC drivers start at $25/hr for the first 12 months rising to $32/hour after 24 months. $62,000-$65,000 is well within the salary range that is competitive with other transit agencies.

By “too much”, I mean more than they need in order to attract sufficient supply of labour. How much other systems pay is irrelevant — our system should pay only what it needs to in order to run properly. That might be less or more than other systems. The transit system is a public service, paid for by taxes, and it should be run economically, not as a way to feed extra money to a tiny number of people employed in its operation.

Having said that, I fully expect that the people running the hiring process know what they are doing. It may be that they expect 99% of the applicants to be unqualified and the way hiring works in this industry is that lots of resumés have to be filtered out. Or maybe they are only a few thousand a year over the salary at which they would get a significantly smaller number of applicants; if so, the extra few thousand a year might be worth it to reduce turnover and ensure they can choose the applicants they want, rather than having to accept everybody who applies who basically meets the criteria. Hard-to-measure intangibles can be very important in hiring.
Reply
(05-31-2018, 07:52 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(05-31-2018, 06:44 PM)trainspotter139 Wrote: They aren't offering too much. This is a competitive rate for LRV operators when you compare other systems. TTC drivers start at $25/hr for the first 12 months rising to $32/hour after 24 months. $62,000-$65,000 is well within the salary range that is competitive with other transit agencies.

By “too much”, I mean more than they need in order to attract sufficient supply of labour. How much other systems pay is irrelevant — our system should pay only what it needs to in order to run properly. That might be less or more than other systems. The transit system is a public service, paid for by taxes, and it should be run economically, not as a way to feed extra money to a tiny number of people employed in its operation.

Having said that, I fully expect that the people running the hiring process know what they are doing. It may be that they expect 99% of the applicants to be unqualified and the way hiring works in this industry is that lots of resumés have to be filtered out. Or maybe they are only a few thousand a year over the salary at which they would get a significantly smaller number of applicants; if so, the extra few thousand a year might be worth it to reduce turnover and ensure they can choose the applicants they want, rather than having to accept everybody who applies who basically meets the criteria. Hard-to-measure intangibles can be very important in hiring.

Worth noting that as I understand these folks are employed by a private sector company, and they're wages aren't set by the region, nor paid by the region (which is to say that if the private company paid less, the company would take home more profit)--correct me if I'm wrong here, but that was my understanding.
Reply
Nope, you're absolutely right Dan. The Region pays a fixed price to GrandLinq (Keolis). They can pay their drivers whatever they want.

People who are paid well for what they do and are treated well are better employees. Saying "they're paying too much" because they got a massive response to their hiring campaign is ludicrous.
Reply
If the hiring process was online too the cost to apply is basically nothing but a few clicks of a mouse. It's not like the olden days of knocking on doors and handing out paper resumes. I would imagine most jobs paying decent wages are getting heaps of applications.
Reply


(05-31-2018, 08:26 PM)Canard Wrote: Nope, you're absolutely right Dan.  The Region pays a fixed price to GrandLinq (Keolis).  They can pay their drivers whatever they want.

People who are paid well for what they do and are treated well are better employees.  Saying "they're paying too much" because they got a massive response to their hiring campaign is ludicrous.

At some level of massive response it’s ludicrous to argue there is no problem with the salary. There is no reason why “LRT driver” or “government worker” should be massively more attractive than other jobs. Say we post a job and get 100 qualified applicants per position (so, to be fair, not the situation we have here). Don’t you think we should consider paying less? What if we get 1000 qualified applicants per position? 10000? At what point do you think maybe there is no need to pay that much?

Similarly, if there is a low response to the posting, then the fix might be simply to increase the salary.

Except in the short term, gluts and shortages are symptoms of an unwillingness to let prices move to their natural level.

But, as I already noted, it’s not actually clear there is a glut here: if only a tiny fraction of the applicants are qualified, they may need the large applicant pool in order to find enough people. And making the job a little more attractive than it strictly needs to be may pay off in better retention and the ability to be selective, even among qualified applicants.

So what I actually said is much more conditional than people are making it sound. I agree that one cannot conclude that the job is too attractive just from what has been reported in the newspaper. Somebody else made a good point that it’s very easy to apply now; I agree that it would not be surprising to find that many jobs result in large numbers of applications.
Reply
ITT crabs in a bucket
Reply
(05-31-2018, 10:25 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(05-31-2018, 08:26 PM)Canard Wrote: Nope, you're absolutely right Dan.  The Region pays a fixed price to GrandLinq (Keolis).  They can pay their drivers whatever they want.

People who are paid well for what they do and are treated well are better employees.  Saying "they're paying too much" because they got a massive response to their hiring campaign is ludicrous.

At some level of massive response it’s ludicrous to argue there is no problem with the salary. There is no reason why “LRT driver” or “government worker” should be massively more attractive than other jobs. Say we post a job and get 100 qualified applicants per position (so, to be fair, not the situation we have here). Don’t you think we should consider paying less? What if we get 1000 qualified applicants per position? 10000? At what point do you think maybe there is no need to pay that much?

Similarly, if there is a low response to the posting, then the fix might be simply to increase the salary.

Except in the short term, gluts and shortages are symptoms of an unwillingness to let prices move to their natural level.

But, as I already noted, it’s not actually clear there is a glut here: if only a tiny fraction of the applicants are qualified, they may need the large applicant pool in order to find enough people. And making the job a little more attractive than it strictly needs to be may pay off in better retention and the ability to be selective, even among qualified applicants.

So what I actually said is much more conditional than people are making it sound. I agree that one cannot conclude that the job is too attractive just from what has been reported in the newspaper. Somebody else made a good point that it’s very easy to apply now; I agree that it would not be surprising to find that many jobs result in large numbers of applications.

If they were to pay less than what the TTC pays they wouldn't get applications because people would go to the TTC instead. If you want high quality, qualified applicants you have to pay them like they are high quality, qualified applicants or they will go elsewhere.
Reply
(05-31-2018, 04:45 PM)tomh009 Wrote:
(05-31-2018, 03:53 PM)jeffster Wrote: Serious question: Is $62,000 - $65,000 a good pay for this?

1) You're dealing with members of the public.
2) By the looks of it, you might be getting physical with certain members of the public that need help getting on and off LRT.
3) RRSP -- no DB pension.
4) Shift premium? It doesn't mention it. I'm guessing this is the reason for the range? Or is $62-$65,000 because of "steps". As in, $62,000 Step 1, $63,000 Step 2....etc

I ask this, because, GRT drivers probably make close to the same, do the same type of work, but; they have OMERS.  There would also be shift premium for afternoons/evening work and weekend work.

TTC drivers start at around $25/h. That's roughly $52,000 as an annual salary. And I think it's safe to assume that GRT isn't paying significantly higher than TTC. Shift premiums and defined-benefit pensions may make up the difference to the Grandlinq salary range, though.

They make over $30/hour for GRT -- brother-in-law worked there, this was a couple years ago so wages may have changed. I just knew that FT was $62,000/year which DIDN'T include shift premiums, working on holidays, weekend shift premium (Sundays might be double time) and any OT.
Reply
There will be a bus load or 2 of business owner coming your way in the next few months from Mississauga to have a look at the system, but most of all, talking to business owners.

They want to know how things were done or not done to maintain business during the construction and what could be done better for them.

Unless something happens after the election on June 7 for Hurontario LRT, construction is to get underway in 2019 now and a completion/opening date end of 2022.

Feel free to advise these owners what to lookout for.

Metrolinx has a team visiting all the business along the corridor twice a year to make sure they are aware what coming their way as well deal with any issues before construction starts, as well during construction. There will be a monthly news letter listing all the the areas where construction is/plan taking place that will allow anyone to pick and choses what they are interested in only which will then be sent to them until completion. Anyone can subscribe to it.
Reply
(05-31-2018, 11:20 PM)trainspotter139 Wrote: If they were to pay less than what the TTC pays they wouldn't get applications because people would go to the TTC instead. If you want high quality, qualified applicants you have to pay them like they are high quality, qualified applicants or they will go elsewhere.

Not if the TTC also gets tons of applications. Sometimes people have to settle for the lower pay (or higher price, for something they are buying) which is actually available, in preference to the higher pay (or lower price) which can’t actually be had.

I do agree with your last sentence however. The salaries should not be pared to the absolute minimum; if that were done then there would be high turnover and they couldn’t be selective when hiring.
Reply


(05-31-2018, 11:20 PM)trainspotter139 Wrote: If they were to pay less than what the TTC pays they wouldn't get applications because people would go to the TTC instead. If you want high quality, qualified applicants you have to pay them like they are high quality, qualified applicants or they will go elsewhere.

Determining salaries has a few more macro variables, so maybe not quite that simple to state the above. KW and Toronto are completely different markets. For example the cost of living is much higher in Toronto. So it's conceivable to think that someone might choose to make $55k here instead of $65k in Toronto. Income is less, but expenses and housing is also less.
Reply
(05-31-2018, 12:41 PM)KevinT Wrote:
(05-31-2018, 09:34 AM)Bytor Wrote: What is the equipment that is not yet installed on the LRVs?

Great question!  To further quote the report:

Quote:Prior to going into service it is also necessary to install certain specialized equipment. As part of the Project, GrandLinq is responsible for ensuring the finished vehicle integrates seamlessly with the built system. On-board equipment includes radios, antennas and on-board systems to control gates, crossings, and traffic signals. This also allows the vehicles to communicate with ION Control Centre. With this equipment, ION can run at service speeds and at consistent times throughout operations.

Which really confirms that this particular delay is not due to BBD, but either Grandlinq or the region.

(05-31-2018, 12:41 PM)KevinT Wrote: Aside:  I'd be happy if all the phase 3 speculation (including how to pronounce wool-itch [pun, I actually pronounce the second w]) was broken out of this thread.

I don't think we're quite yet at the point of needing a Phase 3 thread. Once the region says something about it publicly that may change, though.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 17 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links