05-25-2017, 11:32 AM
What constitutes "wide" must depend on how much foot traffic there is. Most of our sidewalks could be doubled in width, and still wouldn't be wide.
Yes, on streets where there is little foot or bicycle traffic, MUTs make a lot of sense- why put cyclists at risk in mixed traffic or non-segregated lanes to keep them away from people on foot who barely exist? But, as volumes increase, everything should be separate.
Yes, on streets where there is little foot or bicycle traffic, MUTs make a lot of sense- why put cyclists at risk in mixed traffic or non-segregated lanes to keep them away from people on foot who barely exist? But, as volumes increase, everything should be separate.