04-03-2017, 10:38 AM
I thought the talk of reorganizing flight paths was combined with extending the runway? Which really doesn't make sense to me at this point. And I'm pretty skeptical that the mining service left for reasons related to the noise complaints (which were at least somewhat valid - their planes were noticeably louder than the other planes that fly in/out of Waterloo and left very early in the morning).
http://www.therecord.com/news-story/6328...l-airport/
"Coun. Tom Galloway said politicians were informed about a month ago the company was packing its bags for financial reasons and only after staff asked how to keep the operation here were the early morning flights raised."
I'm pretty sure the "don't change anything" constituency is the most successful because there hasn't been a reason to change anything. The lack of changes to the airport is clearly because of a lack of success in getting business. Unless I'm missing something that should be done in order to attract business, its mostly seemed out of the airport's hands.
http://www.therecord.com/news-story/6328...l-airport/
"Coun. Tom Galloway said politicians were informed about a month ago the company was packing its bags for financial reasons and only after staff asked how to keep the operation here were the early morning flights raised."
I'm pretty sure the "don't change anything" constituency is the most successful because there hasn't been a reason to change anything. The lack of changes to the airport is clearly because of a lack of success in getting business. Unless I'm missing something that should be done in order to attract business, its mostly seemed out of the airport's hands.