12-11-2014, 05:22 PM
If I am reading this report/memo or whatever this is correctly, is the author suggesting we re think the proposed King St underpass? Is he also suggesting that we have goofed by rebuilding the Weber St crossing and should have buried the rail line instead?
I am also noting this report is dated March 2014. There is a reference to 3 lines travelling under the Margaret St bridge. Hasn't our city already reviewed this and decided we are ok with a bridge that can accommodate 2 lines and squeeze in a third?
It will be interesting to see if our politicians acknowledge this report. I hope they do and provide some clarification as we need to get in on this project.
I am also noting this report is dated March 2014. There is a reference to 3 lines travelling under the Margaret St bridge. Hasn't our city already reviewed this and decided we are ok with a bridge that can accommodate 2 lines and squeeze in a third?
It will be interesting to see if our politicians acknowledge this report. I hope they do and provide some clarification as we need to get in on this project.
_____________________________________
I used to be the mayor of sim city. I know what I am talking about.
I used to be the mayor of sim city. I know what I am talking about.