(01-10-2016, 10:43 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: They should expropriate. Sound harsh? That’s what they would do for a highway; it wouldn’t even be a discussion. Non-motor-vehicle traffic remains a second-class citizen.
...because a trail moves less than 1/100th of the volume? (1/1000th? 1/10000th?) The cost-per-expropriation-per-trail-user would be orders of magnitude higher than if it were for a highway.