02-03-2017, 02:29 PM
No doubt it will receive some complaints. Most developments do get some quantity.
Were the complaints from Mount Hope during one of the charettes (or whatever they're calling them now) that explored the different possible levels of development at the transit sub? If that's the case, I would suggest that it's wrong to characterize them as "complaints"- that process was intended to get feedback from the community. How can someone be called a "NIMBY" when, after being asked for feedback, he gives it?
We'll see. But I think Mount Hope, given that it is not an especially "NIMBYish" neighbourhood, and relatively far from King's Crossing. No doubt there will be some. My personal guess would be that it would be a lot less than is seen about, for instance, the Brick redevelopment.
Were the complaints from Mount Hope during one of the charettes (or whatever they're calling them now) that explored the different possible levels of development at the transit sub? If that's the case, I would suggest that it's wrong to characterize them as "complaints"- that process was intended to get feedback from the community. How can someone be called a "NIMBY" when, after being asked for feedback, he gives it?
We'll see. But I think Mount Hope, given that it is not an especially "NIMBYish" neighbourhood, and relatively far from King's Crossing. No doubt there will be some. My personal guess would be that it would be a lot less than is seen about, for instance, the Brick redevelopment.