02-12-2018, 05:15 PM
(02-12-2018, 01:24 PM)nms Wrote: Structural integrity is sometimes in the eye of the beholder as well as their pocketbook. It is easier to argue to tear something down if your only measure is cost rather than other tangible or intangible factors. The (Joseph) Schneider House was saved when it could just as easily been torn down.
Somehow I doubt structural integrity is an issue here. I think the issues are something else. Quite possibly Ontario accessibility law might make converting the manufacturing portion too complex and expensive.
Who knows for sure, looking forward to see what's in store. Can't save everything.