06-26-2018, 04:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-26-2018, 04:36 PM by danbrotherston.)
(06-26-2018, 03:09 PM)Chicopee Wrote:(06-26-2018, 02:51 PM)jamincan Wrote: I don't think the minutes are up, but am I correct in understanding the only people who opposed Galloway-Sealock's motion (and therefore supported the Committee recommendation) were Marsh, Fernandes and Vrbanovic? I want to send an e-mail to the mayor and my councillor - there is an election coming up - but I want to make sure that I am clear what position they actually supported.
It sounded like Marsh suggested pretty much exactly what I suggested as a tighter implementation of the by-law standards. City staff didn't seem clear on whether there would be an issue with that or not.
http://www.tritag.ca/blog/2015/02/23/wha...-clearing/
The most interesting of the responses there is probably Paul Singh, who explicitly stated the need for most study of the cost implications, and yet yesterday voted against that very study.
Etherington (my councillor) also directly contradicted his statements here.