Welcome Guest!
WIn order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 5 Vote(s) - 3.6 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours
Checking out the old Schlichters property.  The render in the signs is basically just cladding, and presumably only on the Queen St side -- Ontario St might remain as is, given that it already has tenants?

The current state of the building.  Cleaned up, but neither beautiful nor heritage.
   

The render.  Very different.  Still it will look a bit odd downtown, with a large parking lot in front of the building.  
   

Interior shot 1: the interior columns actually look quite good, and after the clean-up it looks decent and bright enough, with the large windows on the N side.
   

Interior shot 2: further away from those side windows, it's much less bright, but the skylights for help somewhat
   
Reply
Lots more natural light than I expected.

I can't help but wonder if this is just a temporary solution until it makes sense to build here.
Reply
They'll certainly want to see out the leases on the Ontario-facing businesses; the convenience store may feel pressure to move come 2018 when the bus terminal will (mostly) vacate. I really would like to see something make good use of this space and of the elevation difference.
My Twitter: @KevinLMaps
Reply
(04-25-2016, 12:15 PM)Markster Wrote: Okay, it's thought exercise time!



That plot is zoned Commercial D-1
FSR 2.0
area: ~700m2
Max GFA: ~1400m2
...
And you have to acquire the land, which I'm sure the current owner is going to sit on until they are convinced by a sufficiently large pile of dollars.

Looks like we'll finally see some action on this site - at least with part (2/3) of the lot:
http://www.therecord.com/whatson-story/6...r-decades/
Reply
(10-11-2016, 07:36 AM)Owen Wrote:
(04-25-2016, 12:15 PM)Markster Wrote: Okay, it's thought exercise time!



That plot is zoned Commercial D-1
FSR 2.0
area: ~700m2
Max GFA: ~1400m2
...
And you have to acquire the land, which I'm sure the current owner is going to sit on until they are convinced by a sufficiently large pile of dollars.

Looks like we'll finally see some action on this site - at least with part (2/3) of the lot:  
http://www.therecord.com/whatson-story/6...r-decades/

There's going to be a 19 foot undeveloped section.  What a waste.  Private interests trumping public good.
Reply
How on earth those two weren't merged was beyond me. How foolish.
Reply
(10-11-2016, 08:05 AM)danbrotherston Wrote:
(10-11-2016, 07:36 AM)Owen Wrote: Looks like we'll finally see some action on this site - at least with part (2/3) of the lot:  
http://www.therecord.com/whatson-story/6...r-decades/

There's going to be a 19 foot undeveloped section.  What a waste.  Private interests trumping public good.

(10-11-2016, 08:19 AM)Spokes Wrote: How on earth those two weren't merged was beyond me. How foolish.

From the article:

"We weren't able to conclude a deal with him," Riddoch said of that smaller lot.

And as I said
(04-25-2016, 12:15 PM)Markster Wrote: And you have to acquire the land, which I'm sure the current owner is going to sit on until they are convinced by a sufficiently large pile of dollars.

The owner of the small lot is probably trying to hold out for a far higher price per acre.
The developer has to move forward with what they have, in order to call the bluff.
Reply
@Markster Exactly what I said, "private interests trumping public good".
Reply
(10-11-2016, 10:23 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: @Markster  Exactly what I said, "private interests trumping public good".

What exactly do you propose as an alternative... that the govt expropriate the property from the owner and hand it over to the developer? Don't get me wrong - I agree it's a shame - the owner is being greedy, and his Karma is that he'll end up with nothing as nothing can be developed (that justifies a much higher price per acre) on a 19' strip of land - but I have a hard time seeing where the 'private interests trump public good' argument leads... ?
Reply
Who knows what the current owners reasons were, we weren't at the negotiating table. There may have been multiple shareholders in the property (especially if the land transferred to the children of the original owner). They may have looked at what other downtown property was selling for and figured that they deserved a better deal. Anyone wants to compare this price per acre to the market rate according to more recent transactions? Look at this way, it will give Manulife the option to plant some really big columns if they every decide to build up.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Possibly Related Threads...
  General Urban Cambridge Updates and Rumours Spokes 134 78,736 Today, 08:01 AM
Last Post: Rainrider22
  General Urban Waterloo Updates and Rumours Spokes 641 340,238 10-17-2018, 12:36 PM
Last Post: bgb_ca

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links