+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: GO Transit (/showthread.php?tid=12)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
RE: GO Transit - jwilliamson - 04-05-2022
(04-04-2022, 06:56 PM)nms Wrote: Is it being too cynical to suggest that Metrolinx isn't quite as politically arms-length as might be possible?
I think Metrolinx is only arms-length when it comes to blame for bad consequences. It's pretty clear all decision making is being done at Queen's Park.
RE: GO Transit - Acitta - 04-19-2022
Ontario government awards $1.6B contract for 1st phase of GO Transit train electrification
RE: GO Transit - ac3r - 04-19-2022
(04-19-2022, 12:07 PM)Acitta Wrote: Ontario government awards $1.6B contract for 1st phase of GO Transit train electrification
Quote:The Ontario government has inked a deal worth approximately $1.6 billion to implement the first phase of a mammoth project that could see GO Transit’s entire rail network electrified, potentially opening the door for much more frequent and faster train service.
At least CityNews is being realistic about it.
RE: GO Transit - Acitta - 04-22-2022
New GO Expansion agreement with ONxpress Transportation Partners ushers in exciting future of faster, greener, more frequent GO Train service
"GO Expansion is moving forward to the next stage of development and will transform the region in ways greater than previously imagined. GO Expansion will include infrastructure and operational plans that reduce journey times even more, add more capacity, improve on-time performance, and customer satisfaction."
RE: GO Transit - ac3r - 04-22-2022
How long have we been hearing that? Haha. Proposals and plans and promises, year after year and very little actually happens.
RE: GO Transit - taylortbb - 04-22-2022
(04-22-2022, 01:08 PM)ac3r Wrote: How long have we been hearing that? Haha. Proposals and plans and promises, year after year and very little actually happens.
The amount of work that's gone into the Go network is actually quite significant, but work on active rail lines is very slow. Much of it was started under Wynne (transit was always a top priority for her), but it's exactly the sort of long term infrastructure work that governments rarely do because they won't get credit for it. By the time the project is done the government that started the project is long gone.
This is an award of a major contract, so it's more than just proposals and promises. I agree they could have done things faster, but lets not pretend this is just another study either. The fact that North American governments are so slow to build infrastructure is a real problem, but it's not just an Ontario problem.
RE: GO Transit - ac3r - 04-22-2022
So, significant work has been done, just nothing to show for it? Sounds about right for Metrolinx. "Trust us guys, we're working hard to improve rail transit in Ontario and make commuting a wonderful experience with new trains, cars and rail lines!"...then in reality it's the same crappy service, on slow trains, in overcrowded trains as we've always had. I don't know why people keep falling for it. I'm sure this time it will be different, though.
RE: GO Transit - neonjoe - 04-22-2022
A lot of big expensive infrastructure projects like the Davenport Diamond Grade Separation and other grade separations in Toronto have been ongoing for years. Additionally the work on Guelph that has taken place recently. All of these are a prerequisite to higher speeds and frequencies. Billions have already been spent to get to the point we are at currently. Hopefully the current and next governments will keep pushing this forward. (Although here in KW we may not see much of a direct impact)
RE: GO Transit - taylortbb - 04-22-2022
(04-22-2022, 05:54 PM)ac3r Wrote: So, significant work has been done, just nothing to show for it?
They cut 15-20 minutes off the Kitchener-Toronto GO train time, I don't get how that's nothing.
Is it as fast as it should be? No. But they were never going to go from 120 to 60 minutes in one change. Progress happens incrementally, as various improvements are made.
RE: GO Transit - KevinL - 04-22-2022
This contract will see the busiest parts of GO's network electrified, upgrades to the fleet to move most of it off diesel power, and other expansions that will see massive frequency boosts. And it has world-leading companies like Deutsche Bahn and Alstom ensuring it meets the highest standards. I'm confident we'll get very solid gains from the work, even if it's slower and more piecemeal that w could have had.
RE: GO Transit - neonjoe - 04-22-2022
Reese has a pretty good outline of the pros and cons of this phase of Go Expansion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XOXAY3rPzk
RE: GO Transit - danbrotherston - 04-23-2022
I think the project is major, and I think it will make meaningful improvements in Toronto.
I DON'T think KW is a priority for Metrolinx and I don't see meaningful improvements (15-20 minutes off the trip is good, but AFAIK they still aren't at pre-pandemic levels of service, so that's a wash at best).
I know we've had this discussion before, but I still don't believe there is any realistic plan to implement all day 2 way frequent service to KW.
RE: GO Transit - jamincan - 04-24-2022
There is literally a plan, and this is something like the third time I've linked it to you: https://www.metrolinx.com/en/regionalplanning/projectevaluation/benefitscases/2021-03-04-Kitchener-Mid-Term-Service-Expansion-PDBC-FINAL.pdf
RE: GO Transit - danbrotherston - 04-24-2022
(04-24-2022, 08:34 AM)jamincan Wrote: There is literally a plan, and this is something like the third time I've linked it to you: https://www.metrolinx.com/en/regionalplanning/projectevaluation/benefitscases/2021-03-04-Kitchener-Mid-Term-Service-Expansion-PDBC-FINAL.pdf
Yes, I am aware they have a plan, and I have seen it as you've sent it to me, but I still don't think the plan is realistic, I don't think they will achieve frequent all day two way with it.
RE: GO Transit - ijmorlan - 04-24-2022
(04-24-2022, 10:57 AM)danbrotherston Wrote:(04-24-2022, 08:34 AM)jamincan Wrote: There is literally a plan, and this is something like the third time I've linked it to you: https://www.metrolinx.com/en/regionalplanning/projectevaluation/benefitscases/2021-03-04-Kitchener-Mid-Term-Service-Expansion-PDBC-FINAL.pdf
Yes, I am aware they have a plan, and I have seen it as you've sent it to me, but I still don't think the plan is realistic, I don't think they will achieve frequent all day two way with it.
Do you mean the plan won’t accomplish the stated goals, or that the plan won’t be funded?
It seems obvious to me that if we built the grade separation and did the other improvements, it should then be possible to run the stated service. But it seems equally obvious to me that there is a good chance the government will take forever to provide funding for the plan. So if you’re saying there is no plan to implement the plan, I probably agree with you. If you’re saying the plan, if implemented, wouldn’t accomplish the goal, then I’m confused.