+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Urban Areas (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C (/showthread.php?tid=38)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - bravado - 12-17-2024
(12-17-2024, 05:28 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(12-17-2024, 03:57 PM)ZEBuilder Wrote: Garbage can removals at bus stops, also reversed.
TRITAG was very influential on that decision, same thing with a the UW NDP club.
Garbage can removals? Talk about a false economy.
or, taking Eliminating Waste a bit too literally
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - CP42 - 01-07-2025
Looks like they’re on floor 35 of 36.
I do like the wave look now that it’s more complete, but not sure why they didn’t continue it all the way up on the one side?
![[Image: GehlKaR.jpeg]](https://i.imgur.com/GehlKaR.jpeg)
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - westwardloo - 01-08-2025
This building is looking quite good. I don't like that they just skip back to the start to repeat the wave pattern. Would have looked cleaner if they had continued the wave pattern in the opposite direction. Having a twin is going to make this development look really good though.
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - CP42 - 03-01-2025
From today:
![[Image: l7yF1Ag.jpeg]](https://i.imgur.com/l7yF1Ag.jpeg)
![[Image: rxSqPYJ.jpeg]](https://i.imgur.com/rxSqPYJ.jpeg)
![[Image: gQ08ICq.jpeg]](https://i.imgur.com/gQ08ICq.jpeg)
![[Image: jndeO2b.jpeg]](https://i.imgur.com/jndeO2b.jpeg)
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - CP42 - 03-13-2025
![[Image: 2kPXh0J.jpeg]](https://i.imgur.com/2kPXh0J.jpeg)
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - westwardloo - 03-14-2025
I like this tower and it will look great with a twin, but for some reason it pisses me off what they did with the white spandrel paneling about halfway up the tower. Why they didn't just continue the pattern the opposite direction, is confusing and frustrating.
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - mastermind - 03-14-2025
(03-14-2025, 08:14 AM)westwardloo Wrote: I like this tower and it will look great with a twin, but for some reason it pisses me off what they did with the white spandrel paneling about halfway up the tower. Why they didn't just continue the pattern the opposite direction is confusing and frustrating.
I agree 100%. It bugs me too.
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - Spokes - 03-22-2025
Ya the panels look so good, it would/should have just been logical to continue the flow that they'd been creating
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - Momo26 - 03-22-2025
When is this anticipated occupancy?
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - ZEBuilder - 03-22-2025
(03-22-2025, 01:19 PM)Momo26 Wrote: When is this anticipated occupancy?
They're targeting early 2026 from my understanding.
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - Square - 03-22-2025
(03-22-2025, 03:43 PM)ZEBuilder Wrote:(03-22-2025, 01:19 PM)Momo26 Wrote: When is this anticipated occupancy?
They're targeting early 2026 from my understanding.
And the Platform was going to start in the Fall and now it shows 2025. Sales for condos must be very slow.
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - ac3r - 03-23-2025
(03-14-2025, 08:14 AM)westwardloo Wrote: I like this tower and it will look great with a twin, but for some reason it pisses me off what they did with the white spandrel paneling about halfway up the tower. Why they didn't just continue the pattern the opposite direction, is confusing and frustrating.
I wasn't sure how I'd appreciate the inconsistency so I have been reserving judgment, but now that the skyscraper is tall enough I think it makes sense the way they designed that. If the pattern just looped back, it would look silly. If it was too randomized, it would look even worse. What they did here by just making it appear that they make a sudden change, draws the eye to the tower and makes you notice it.
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - MidTowner - 03-28-2025
(03-22-2025, 08:52 PM)Square Wrote:(03-22-2025, 03:43 PM)ZEBuilder Wrote: They're targeting early 2026 from my understanding.
And the Platform was going to start in the Fall and now it shows 2025. Sales for condos must be very slow.
Do you know, is the Platform what used to be referred to as Building E- with the (potential) grocery store?
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - westwardloo - 03-28-2025
(03-28-2025, 08:12 AM)MidTowner Wrote:(03-22-2025, 08:52 PM)Square Wrote: And the Platform was going to start in the Fall and now it shows 2025. Sales for condos must be very slow.
Do you know, is the Platform what used to be referred to as Building E- with the (potential) grocery store?
I believe the Platform is actually just the second taller tower of what used to be Duo. I could be wrong, I am surprised they would change the marketing on that one when it is clearly a twin tower.
Wouldn't it be nice if they did tower D and E together. In the current market i don't see that happening though.
RE: Station Park | 18, 28, 36, 43, 50 fl | U/C - MidTowner - 03-28-2025
The branding has changed a few times and I've confused myself- but you're right, it's Building D, not E; and I think you're right that Platform is just the second half of what was "Duo."
Building D is the first to include retail space, I think?