![]() |
|
Vogue Residences (née District Condos) | 21 + 14 fl | U/C - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: University Area (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Vogue Residences (née District Condos) | 21 + 14 fl | U/C (/showthread.php?tid=477) |
RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - white_brian - 10-06-2020 Huge Mammoet crane sitting on King St at the moment RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - jwilliamson - 10-06-2020 Looks like the tower crane is going up tomorrow. RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - Spokes - 10-07-2020 Anyone go past here today? Is it going up? RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - jwilliamson - 10-07-2020 (10-07-2020, 01:28 PM)Spokes Wrote: Anyone go past here today? Is it going up? I went by around 1 and it didn't look like the crane had moved at all since yesterday. RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - jwilliamson - 10-08-2020 The mobile crane is up and working right now. RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - Coke6pk - 10-09-2020 Coke RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - jwilliamson - 10-09-2020 RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - Spokes - 10-09-2020 Thanks for all the pictures! RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - jwilliamson - 10-25-2020 RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - jwilliamson - 11-05-2020 RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - jwilliamson - 01-06-2021 RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - taylortbb - 03-22-2021 The SRM website has five renders of the new design that I don't think have been posted before, http://www.srmarchitects.ca/Portfolio-Residential-155-King.htm . We might have a building uglier than DTK, that podium cladding is something else. RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - westwardloo - 03-23-2021 (03-22-2021, 04:10 PM)taylortbb Wrote: The SRM website has five renders of the new design that I don't think have been posted before, http://www.srmarchitects.ca/Portfolio-Residential-155-King.htm . We might have a building uglier than DTK, that podium cladding is something else.SRM really needs to work on their podium design. How does this get past the design development phase? Do the principles at the firm not care what their name is attached to? I guess they are making so much money being the cheapest firm in the region that they could care less how people perceive them. Still not as bad as DTK, but it is close. I don't hate hate the towers, not sure why they need to randomly change the size of the balconies. Those grey spandrel panels will also look bad new. RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - ac3r - 03-23-2021 (03-23-2021, 12:00 PM)westwardloo Wrote: SRM really needs to work on their podium design. How does this get past the design development phase? Do the principles at the firm not care what their name is attached to? I guess they are making so much money being the cheapest firm in the region that they could care less how people perceive them. Still not as bad as DTK, but it is close. I don't hate hate the towers, not sure why they need to randomly change the size of the balconies. Those grey spandrel panels will also look bad new. It's the trend right now and I can't wait until that dies out. It's everywhere. For the love of god, fellow architects, dust off your text books and reread Dieter Rams' principles on good design! Haha. Quote:Good design is: RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - dtkvictim - 03-23-2021 (03-23-2021, 12:13 PM)ac3r Wrote:Quote:Good design is: It seems odd to apply this list to architecture, when this list also claims that said products are not decorative objects nor works of art. Confusingly, this list also seems to directly contradict that statement by highlighting the importance of aesthetics, beauty, and psychological effects. Maybe I'm reading into this wrong. |