![]() |
|
GO Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: GO Transit (/showthread.php?tid=12) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
|
RE: GO Transit - westwardloo - 03-17-2026 (03-16-2026, 11:10 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: I'll be blunt, and this is an unpopular opinion. I think new large park and ride facilities on greenfield space is a bad idea. Ok, I guess myself and many others will just drive to Toronto then. Personally I live in the country so bus is not an option, but If I lived in the edge of town with bus connection I would not and I suspect a lot of others would not take the bus 30-45 mins to get on a train. I would however take the my car 10-15 mins to then jump on the train. I just don't understand your all or nothing Bike/walk/take transit mentality. I know you live abroad in Europe (Netherlands) with a much better transit system then us. But they still build park and Ride with parking garages. They still have HWY's connecting small cities. The point is to invest is all aspects of the transportation system. Do I think we can do better on the Bike/ transportation infrastructure, absolutely, but that does not mean we don't invest in car infrastructure as well. RE: GO Transit - danbrotherston - 03-17-2026 (03-17-2026, 08:18 AM)westwardloo Wrote:(03-16-2026, 11:10 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: I'll be blunt, and this is an unpopular opinion. I think new large park and ride facilities on greenfield space is a bad idea. What is wrong with driving to Toronto in this context? Even here, I would not suggest people that live where you live are expected to take transit somewhere, and in fact, would find doing so fairly inconvenient (even if it's more possible than for you). The point is that I'm arguing for building something that doesn't exist in Canada...a place where transit (and walking, and even biking) are put above convenience for drivers. Such a place does not exist. You are arguing for making transit a more palatable option for some people, but without changing anything about the car oriented nature of every single place in the country. I'm arguing for choice. If you want to live in a rural area, and be dependent on a car, that's a choice you can make, and there's nothing wrong with that. But conversely people _should also_ have the option of living in a comfortable urban environment and not be dependent on _or_ dominated by cars. Right now, only one choice is possible in Canada. Now yes, what I am suggesting is that for you, the most reasonable thing to do is to drive to Toronto, but why do you take that as a problem? That's already the case. P&Rs are not car infrastructure, their urban infrastructure. Yes, even the NLs has P&Rs, but not as many as you think. Where I live, if someone in the rural area outside the city I live in (somewhere you wouldn't bus/bike/walk to the train station) was going to Amsterdam (or indeed, even the centre of our city) that person would drive to the city and park in a Parking facility on the edge of the city centre. They wouldn't drive to an intercity train station and take the train in. RE: GO Transit - danbrotherston - 03-17-2026 And also, if we consider the traffic argument, I think my position still is the winner. Yes, building a P&R might take some traffic off the 401 and reduce congestion, but due to induced demand, probably not have any savings in time. But at the same time, there's going to be 100k new people, and by encouraging the same development pattern all 100k of those people will be in cars that will be added to our already congested streets. So we're (optimistically) -1000 cars on the 401 per day and +100k cars overall. If instead we built out a station with a transit oriented community around it of 30k residents. Then we're going to be +70k cars overall. This is what I mean about systemic changes. Yeah, taking 1000 cars of the 401 sounds good. But it's a drop in the bucket of the ongoing unsustainable and broken development patterns. If instead, the pattern is changed, that will result in much deeper changes to how things work. RE: GO Transit - plam - 03-17-2026 (03-17-2026, 04:42 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: I think commuter rail is a uniquely North American phenomenon. No other country (or at least none I can think of) builds a transit system that is designed to cater only to commute hour drivers. So yes, if the only goal is to do that, then a P&R makes sense. But I don't think that should be the goal here. Overall I agree that park and ride is very status quo focussed and not really actually an efficient use of money---but what is, when it comes to cars? Commuter rail makes me think of Paris's RER. And indeed, they have "parcs relais" which seem to be park and ride, though only on the furthest-out stations: https://www.transilien.com/fr/page-deplacements/parcs-relais Wellington, NZ does have commuter rail, as does Auckland. Wellington's rail stations come with parking lots. It's my impression that some places are trying to build in a downtown after the fact like the Vaughan Metropolitan Centre. I really don't want to think about Vaughan though. But when we have greenfield here we all too often build fiascoes like the Boardwalk. Ugh. RE: GO Transit - danbrotherston - 03-17-2026 (03-17-2026, 10:58 AM)plam Wrote:(03-17-2026, 04:42 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: I think commuter rail is a uniquely North American phenomenon. No other country (or at least none I can think of) builds a transit system that is designed to cater only to commute hour drivers. So yes, if the only goal is to do that, then a P&R makes sense. But I don't think that should be the goal here. Lol...Australia and New Zealand are just part of North America the same way Montreal and Quebec are part of Europe. 🤣 To be fair, my experience is not that broad, and really there is lots of diversity in the world, things are not as absolute as we like, but I think these are general trends. That said, I completely agree, as I said in my first message, I'm unlikely to convince anyone here, and I certainly have zero influence over Metrolinx or GO, they're going to do as they are planning to do I'm sure. But even if they decided they wanted to do better, even if they had politicians and planners on board to do something better, I would still not expect it to be truly revolutionary, there is just so much inertia in the system. But I think there's still value in challenging the status quo, because even the idea that we should be changing things fundamentally can shift the overton window. One person cannot change the direction, but neither can zero people. One step at a time. Maybe someone makes enough noise that they build a nice station square that makes access just a little nicer than a sea of parking. Maybe next time they do as ijmorlan suggests and builds only half the station facing parking. But to me, the real shame is that there are not that many opportunities to build a greenfield train station like this, and certainly for the KW & Guelph communities, probably only one. RE: GO Transit - KevinL - 03-17-2026 Europe is not immune to this; Britain has stations near motorways with large parking areas (usually with 'Parkway' in the name), and France has been know to build high-speed stations outside of smaller urban centres and put parking lots with them. But the Park-and-Ride is certainly most common here in North America. RE: GO Transit - tomh009 - 03-18-2026 (03-17-2026, 08:18 AM)westwardloo Wrote: Ok, I guess myself and many others will just drive to Toronto then. Personally I live in the country so bus is not an option, but If I lived in the edge of town with bus connection I would not and I suspect a lot of others would not take the bus 30-45 mins to get on a train. I would however take the my car 10-15 mins to then jump on the train. But it's not automatically 10-15 minutes. SW Kitchener to Breslau is 20 minutes (without traffic). St Jacobs is 20 minutes. Laurelwood is 25 minutes. Baden is 25 minutes. Add 5-10 minutes for traffic, or more, and now you are in the 30-40 minute range. Do you see that as a reasonable time to drive to a GO station? RE: GO Transit - westwardloo - 03-19-2026 (03-18-2026, 08:13 PM)tomh009 Wrote:(03-17-2026, 08:18 AM)westwardloo Wrote: Ok, I guess myself and many others will just drive to Toronto then. Personally I live in the country so bus is not an option, but If I lived in the edge of town with bus connection I would not and I suspect a lot of others would not take the bus 30-45 mins to get on a train. I would however take the my car 10-15 mins to then jump on the train. I know people that drive 60 minutes to the burlington GO station on Saturdays in the summer to see Blue jays games all the time. 20 mins to a GO station is nothing. when I lived in Toronto I walked 15 mins to get to a subway stop. Personally I would love to see GO expanded into west kitchener as well. It would be a fairly good location for transit, walkers, bikers and cars to access a station near the Boardwalk. It could even spur a future redevelopment of that crapshoot of a box store plaza. Just because Breslau would be a Park & Ride style station doesn't mean the Region or Township couldn't plan to build a mixed use space around the station that provides retail, commercial space and housing. I think the location picked for the Breslau GO also has the potential to have trails built to it from all the neighbourhoods in Breslau. So hopefully those residents would take bikes/ walk. RE: GO Transit - danbrotherston - 03-19-2026 (03-19-2026, 08:33 AM)westwardloo Wrote:(03-18-2026, 08:13 PM)tomh009 Wrote: But it's not automatically 10-15 minutes. SW Kitchener to Breslau is 20 minutes (without traffic). St Jacobs is 20 minutes. Laurelwood is 25 minutes. Baden is 25 minutes. Add 5-10 minutes for traffic, or more, and now you are in the 30-40 minute range. Geometry is a physical law. If you build a P&R facility then the station is surrounded by parking, not housing and businesses. Walking is inherently a slow mode. Things have to be very close together for it to be useful. But putting things very close together is geometrically impossible when you are planning on accommodating 1000 parked cars all day. This is actually why cycling is so powerful. It lets you spread things out a little bit more without consuming the vast amount of space that cars require. So yeah, it doesn't matter if the region surrounds the station in housing, and I have no doubt that they will. The fact will be even people living next to the station will probably drive to it, because the alternative is walking through acres of surface parking which is unpleasant on a cold winter night, or a hot summer day, or even pleasant spring day. Which means the development pattern of those houses will remain the same, they will mandate 3-4 car spaces per house (because every member of a household will need to drive) and then everything will be spread out and entirely car dependent. This is WHY this kind of thing is fundamental. It is extremely hard to change things incrementally, which is why a new greenfield development like this is such a missed opportunity. In other news, we just had a local election here in the Netherlands. While the previous government implemented a paid parking scheme across the whole city. A protest party ran to oppose this (and other*) policy. While they didn't win, they did come second. But the people who support this party would never want a city like Kitchener, but they cannot imagine how just allowing every single person to drive and park everywhere for free would lead to it. The same way most people in Kitchener cannot imagine how a city that doesn't have that could function. People have a fundamental lack of imagination... * For interest the other top policies of this party: More police, less immigrants, no wind turbines, no more apartments. Some things are very familiar here. RE: GO Transit - Acitta - 03-26-2026 Metrolinx’s $27B GO Expansion delayed and scaled back: confidential report Metrolinx’s promise of two-way, all-day GO service has been delayed, internal documents from the provincial transit agency show. Meanwhile, under the reframed vision for what’s known as GO Expansion, some riders on the province’s train system could find their trips getting slower, not faster. The Kitchener and Barrie lines could also have slower travel times, according to the proposed plan, because of additional stations. The Kitchener Line has new stops at Mt. Dennis, Woodbine, St. Clair-Old Weston and Kitchener-Central. The Barrie Line is now expected to connect Innisfil to Caledonia Station on Line 5, St. Clair-Old Weston, Bloor-Lansdowne and Spadina-Front. RE: GO Transit - danbrotherston - 03-27-2026 I mean, is anyone surprised by this? Disappointed of course, but this was pretty much a given, after the earlier issues this project has faced. It is the kind of thing that a brash, non-nonsense politician like Ford _should_ be able to overcome, by just telling people to do it fucking right and if they won't removing them. Unfortunately Ford is Ford, and not Mamdami....so probably it's not going to happen... RE: GO Transit - tomh009 - 03-27-2026 I'm not too worried about the additional stations (is Kitchener-Central the current station, though, with Kitchener-East coming later?), some of those will be skipped by express trains anyway. And the Kitchener line wasn't getting electrified yet anyway. And it doesn't look like they are cancelling the long-awaited all-day two-way GO service to Kitchener? RE: GO Transit - MidTowner - 04-14-2026 New schedule posted, effective April 25 Starting Monday, April 27, we’re adding more weekday express trains between Kitchener GO and Union Station.
RE: GO Transit - nms - 04-17-2026 Stratford to get daily GO train service starting in July (CBC) Quote:On weekdays, the train will travel from Stratford to Toronto's Union Station in the mornings, leaving Stratford just after 6 a.m. and arriving in Toronto before 9 a.m. The return trip in the evenings would leave Toronto around 5 p.m. and arrive in Stratford at about 7:30 p.m.. RE: GO Transit - BormanConstruction - 04-17-2026 (04-17-2026, 12:04 PM)nms Wrote: Stratford to get daily GO train service starting in July (CBC) That's quite cool. Though, I don't envy the whole 'train departing around 6am and arriving at Union around 9am' thing haha |