Trails - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Trails (/showthread.php?tid=378) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
|
RE: Trails - nms - 03-28-2022 (03-23-2022, 06:43 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:(03-23-2022, 04:23 PM)cherrypark Wrote: New information about the Stewart St and Joseph St MUTs reconstruction is on EngageWR now, including the drawings package. I believe you mean the Home Hardware Building Centre. RE: Trails - danbrotherston - 03-29-2022 (03-28-2022, 07:46 PM)nms Wrote:(03-23-2022, 06:43 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I never did check out the Vic St. MUT, I guess I should have. Yeah, the region doesn't really pay a lot of attention to getting grading right for cycling infra, although even the city refuses to build flush curbs (and we know they can, they often build flush curbs between the road and sidewalks/bike lanes). Yes, you are right, my mistake. RE: Trails - nms - 03-29-2022 I took a quick Google Street View run down Stewart St, and with the exception of the 30m between the Home Hardware truck exit and Park St where parking restrictions might be required to allow the trucks space to pass, there doesn't look to be anything else along there that would be adversely affected by the proposed plan. RE: Trails - danbrotherston - 03-30-2022 (03-29-2022, 04:55 PM)nms Wrote: I took a quick Google Street View run down Stewart St, and with the exception of the 30m between the Home Hardware truck exit and Park St where parking restrictions might be required to allow the trucks space to pass, there doesn't look to be anything else along there that would be adversely affected by the proposed plan. Yes, I agree, but only because the current plan has significantly greater turn radii than the complete streets guide advises. RE: Trails - nms - 03-30-2022 Does the Complete Streets Guide factor in transport trucks with longer turn radii than possibly other urban vehicles like buses or firetrucks? RE: Trails - danbrotherston - 03-31-2022 (03-30-2022, 05:14 PM)nms Wrote: Does the Complete Streets Guide factor in transport trucks with longer turn radii than possibly other urban vehicles like buses or firetrucks? Yes, it is the "complete" streets guide, but on residential streets, it's generally considered that on residential streets, such vehicles should not be the design vehicle, if they have to work their way around a corner using the entire right of way, that's fine. In this case, there is a trip generator that will mean there are more large trucks than usual turning in and out, however, home depot's trucks are not the largest type of transport truck, so they should have no trouble turning in the same radius as a fire truck. RE: Trails - Acitta - 04-17-2022 Here are pictures of the Transit Hub MUT Joseph St. to King St. that I took last Tuesday (Ap. 14). RE: Trails - cherrypark - 04-18-2022 That exit from the MUT is troublingly right angular and narrow. What was the thinking there? Not looking forward to trying to cycling through that with any additional users in the gap. RE: Trails - danbrotherston - 04-18-2022 (04-18-2022, 01:17 PM)cherrypark Wrote: That exit from the MUT is troublingly right angular and narrow. What was the thinking there? Not looking forward to trying to cycling through that with any additional users in the gap. This question includes assumptions which are not justified. Our engineers are automatons who apply standards without thinking, there is no standard requiring thoughtful corners on MUTs so there aren't any, sadly unless there is someone on them every step of the way, they'll do stuff like this pretty much by wrote. FWIW...that's actually connecting to another MUT, but you'd never know it, because it was only built as a non-compliant sidewalk...our engineers had this conversation: Engineer 1: "what's a MUT, that's a wide sidewalk right?" Engineer 2: "Yeah, sounds right." E1: "Hmm...I don't have room for a wide sidewalk...." E2: "Okay, just a regular sidewalk then..." E1: "well I don't even have that much room..." E2: "I'm sure it's fine." RE: Trails - ac3r - 04-18-2022 Engineers generally think like engineers, so this trail being awkward is hardly a surprise. Their minds tend to think a certain way so they tend to forget the human aspect of things when it comes to design. You can see the dichotomy of this when it comes to software design, too. In fact, it was largely thanks to the architect Christopher Alexander who influenced software design through his approach to architecture to become much more human focused. For the longest time, software design was awful and it made using it - for the general population - was highly cumbersome and annoying. It wasn't until recently that UX design became an ever more important aspect of software design because with the proliferation of devices being so ubiquitous that software companies needed to ensure their software could be easily understood and pleasing for users to utilize. There's definitely a lot to criticize about this trail. The weird 90 degree angles, the fact the exit is behind a rapid transit station, that it comes out on an incredibly busy and very pedestrian unfriendly intersection, that it just exits on a busy sidewalk and so much more. But, I can understand why this is the result. Engineers just suck at thinking about human aspect of design. This sort of stuff ought to be designed by landscape architects, while letting engineers manage the boring nonsense like where to put bricks or what angle to build a ramp on. RE: Trails - Acitta - 04-18-2022 (04-18-2022, 01:17 PM)cherrypark Wrote: That exit from the MUT is troublingly right angular and narrow. What was the thinking there? Not looking forward to trying to cycling through that with any additional users in the gap. I imagine that they will widen the exit. It is, after all, not finished yet. RE: Trails - cherrypark - 04-18-2022 (04-18-2022, 01:55 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:(04-18-2022, 01:17 PM)cherrypark Wrote: That exit from the MUT is troublingly right angular and narrow. What was the thinking there? Not looking forward to trying to cycling through that with any additional users in the gap. Wish it were not the case, however... (04-18-2022, 05:03 PM)Acitta Wrote:(04-18-2022, 01:17 PM)cherrypark Wrote: That exit from the MUT is troublingly right angular and narrow. What was the thinking there? Not looking forward to trying to cycling through that with any additional users in the gap. You are right, perhaps some marginal widening to come, though judging by the newer retaining wall stones I would be surprised there is much more to change. The downhill slope into a tight 90 and a "stop sign" (lol.) with a giant stone wall is asking for a bad time, especially for the less confident riders a MUT is supposed to encourage to ride more. RE: Trails - danbrotherston - 04-19-2022 (04-18-2022, 05:03 PM)Acitta Wrote:(04-18-2022, 01:17 PM)cherrypark Wrote: That exit from the MUT is troublingly right angular and narrow. What was the thinking there? Not looking forward to trying to cycling through that with any additional users in the gap. Those retaining walls sure look finished to me. RE: Trails - Acitta - 04-19-2022 (04-19-2022, 01:47 AM)danbrotherston Wrote:(04-18-2022, 05:03 PM)Acitta Wrote: I imagine that they will widen the exit. It is, after all, not finished yet. The end is only two levels high. It wouldn't be hard to remove them. RE: Trails - danbrotherston - 04-19-2022 (04-19-2022, 09:41 AM)Acitta Wrote:(04-19-2022, 01:47 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Those retaining walls sure look finished to me. "Removing them" implies they are finished, and being changed after the fact. It's possible the contractor has made an error that will be corrected, but in any case, even if they widened that, I'd still call it a bad design. |