General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Urban Areas (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Thread: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours (/showthread.php?tid=8) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
|
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 04-12-2019 So Walper continues to have a barbershop, the current barbers have a new home, and there is an appropriate new business at the renovated house at Joseph/Water. Looks like a win-win arrangement in the end. RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - danbrotherston - 04-12-2019 (04-12-2019, 12:32 PM)tomh009 Wrote: So Walper continues to have a barbershop, the current barbers have a new home, and there is an appropriate new business at the renovated house at Joseph/Water. Wouldn't be a win for the media... RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - KevinL - 04-12-2019 Well, the existing tenants still have to move, encourage their repeat customers to move with them, and work on new marketing strategies in a new setting. They still have their business, yes, but they got the shortest stick. RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Spokes - 04-15-2019 But they were given an opportunity to stay RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Rainrider22 - 04-15-2019 (04-15-2019, 06:08 AM)Spokes Wrote: But they were given an opportunity to stay No they weren't!! RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ijmorlan - 04-15-2019 (04-15-2019, 07:54 AM)Rainrider22 Wrote:(04-15-2019, 06:08 AM)Spokes Wrote: But they were given an opportunity to stay Weren’t they offered a new lease? They just didn’t like the offered terms (As I understand it; corrections welcome). RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - jamincan - 04-15-2019 (04-15-2019, 07:54 AM)Rainrider22 Wrote:(04-15-2019, 06:08 AM)Spokes Wrote: But they were given an opportunity to stay So they weren't given an opportunity to accept the higher rates? RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 04-15-2019 Based on the newspaper articles, Perimeter was looking for some improvements (not clear what) and a long-term commitment. Rainrider22, if you can clarify what they were offered that would be good. RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Rainrider22 - 04-15-2019 (04-15-2019, 09:58 AM)tomh009 Wrote: Based on the newspaper articles, Perimeter was looking for some improvements (not clear what) and a long-term commitment. Rainrider22, if you can clarify what they were offered that would be good. I will tell you more when I can. If you want to know before hand. Go in and get a hair cut. Rob, Linda, Jordan, or Sandra will tell you. I don't want to say anything yet . I don't want to compromise their current situation. It isn't a good story though. RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Spokes - 04-16-2019 (04-15-2019, 09:58 AM)tomh009 Wrote: Based on the newspaper articles, Perimeter was looking for some improvements (not clear what) and a long-term commitment. Rainrider22, if you can clarify what they were offered that would be good. That's the story as I've heard it but I'm now curious RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - urbd - 04-17-2019 (04-16-2019, 08:25 PM)Spokes Wrote:(04-15-2019, 09:58 AM)tomh009 Wrote: Based on the newspaper articles, Perimeter was looking for some improvements (not clear what) and a long-term commitment. Rainrider22, if you can clarify what they were offered that would be good. This is it! Barbers lease is month to month with clause that Perimeter could stop it at anytime. Perimeter wanted investment (renovations) in the space to bring it up to par with the renovated Walper. Perimeter wanted a long term lease that was much higher than month to month was. Barbers could not afford any of that. Barbers are forced to move out because they simply cannot afford the new terms. It's not that extraordinary RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ijmorlan - 04-17-2019 (04-17-2019, 09:25 AM)urbd Wrote: This is it! Barbers lease is month to month with clause that Perimeter could stop it at anytime. Perimeter wanted investment (renovations) in the space to bring it up to par with the renovated Walper. Perimeter wanted a long term lease that was much higher than month to month was. Barbers could not afford any of that. Barbers are forced to move out because they simply cannot afford the new terms. Rule 1 of real estate: if you want security of tenure, own your property. Also have it in a jurisdiction where wealthy, politically-connected developers can’t just get the city to declare your area “derelict” and take it away well under true value. But that’s a whole other issue… RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - panamaniac - 04-17-2019 (04-17-2019, 01:35 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(04-17-2019, 09:25 AM)urbd Wrote: This is it! Barbers lease is month to month with clause that Perimeter could stop it at anytime. Perimeter wanted investment (renovations) in the space to bring it up to par with the renovated Walper. Perimeter wanted a long term lease that was much higher than month to month was. Barbers could not afford any of that. Barbers are forced to move out because they simply cannot afford the new terms. Somewhere specific in mind? RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ijmorlan - 04-17-2019 (04-17-2019, 01:46 PM)panamaniac Wrote:(04-17-2019, 01:35 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: Rule 1 of real estate: if you want security of tenure, own your property. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London Oddly, Antonin Scalia was on the side of the angels and Ruth Bader Ginsburg was … not. Surprising/disappointing. And I just remembered the word I meant was “blighted”. My impression is that in general Canada is much better for this. It is still possible the government can decide that this particular block absolutely needs to be turned into a park or public square (I’m looking at you, Dundas Square!), but in general expropriations are done for legitimate infrastructure projects. Even in the past when we still bulldozed poor neighbourhoods, they were either turned into public housing (Regent Park in Toronto) or City Hall (Toronto), or the place just sat for decades (Lebreton Flats in Ottawa). It seems that generally we don’t just turn the expropriated property over to a developer to make tons of money for themselves. RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - plam - 04-17-2019 (04-17-2019, 06:11 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: My impression is that in general Canada is much better for this. It is still possible the government can decide that this particular block absolutely needs to be turned into a park or public square (I’m looking at you, Dundas Square!), but in general expropriations are done for legitimate infrastructure projects. Even in the past when we still bulldozed poor neighbourhoods, they were either turned into public housing (Regent Park in Toronto) or City Hall (Toronto), or the place just sat for decades (Lebreton Flats in Ottawa). It seems that generally we don’t just turn the expropriated property over to a developer to make tons of money for themselves. That is consistent with my understanding as well. It really seems like it has to be for a legitimate public purpose and that we're much closer to paying fair market value for expropriated property. Halifax also has the Africville thing in its own non-brilliant history, so we're not perfect. |