+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Urban Areas (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Completed (/showthread.php?tid=1337)
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - PassTheBruce - 02-12-2019
(02-12-2019, 03:47 PM)I’m tomh009 Wrote: Building permit (19-105380 MU) now issued.
Is there a way to view PDFs of what has been permitted ? Floor plans, that kind of thing ?
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - tomh009 - 02-12-2019
(02-12-2019, 10:46 PM)Spokes Wrote: Fantastic. 2019/2020 will be BUSY
I think Vive will have four (!) buildings under way: this one, Margaret/Victoria, 51 David St and 262 Queen St.
They also own another property in the east end, which looks to be later, and the second phase of Woodside Terraces is still to come.
And the American Block? There is an interior demolition permit but I suspect the project will need council approval.
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - Spokes - 02-12-2019
(02-12-2019, 11:02 PM)tomh009 Wrote:(02-12-2019, 10:46 PM)Spokes Wrote: Fantastic. 2019/2020 will be BUSY
I think Vive will have four (!) buildings under way: this one, Margaret/Victoria, 51 David St and 262 Queen St.
They also own another property in the east end, which looks to be later, and the second phase of Woodside Terraces is still to come.
And the American Block? There is an interior demolition permit but I suspect the project will need council approval.
Good for them. I had my doubts at times, but they're making it happen
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - BruceAshe - 04-22-2019
There is fencing up around the properties on this lot now. I didn't notice any signs about demolition so maybe it's just to stop people from going into them. Demo would be more exciting.
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - sluismcfc - 04-22-2019
(02-12-2019, 10:57 PM)PassTheBruce Wrote:(02-12-2019, 03:47 PM)I’m tomh009 Wrote: Building permit (19-105380 MU) now issued.
Is there a way to view PDFs of what has been permitted ? Floor plans, that kind of thing ?
They have demolition permits for the two houses as well as a foundation permit for the new building. This info can be found by searching the building permits file in the City's Open Data catalogue.
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - panamaniac - 04-22-2019
(04-22-2019, 12:48 PM)BruceAshe Wrote: There is fencing up around the properties on this lot now. I didn't notice any signs about demolition so maybe it's just to stop people from going into them. Demo would be more exciting.There was heavy equipment on site this afternoon.
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - tomh009 - 04-23-2019
It looks like pre-demolition clean-up has already been started.
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - tomh009 - 04-23-2019
Demolition has started!
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - Spokes - 04-23-2019
Thanks for the updates!
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - Acitta - 04-30-2019
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - Rainrider22 - 04-30-2019
WOW, that looks better already !!
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - tomh009 - 04-30-2019
Hmmm. Acitta's images don't display for me at all. Tried Edge, Firefox and Chrome.
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - Acitta - 04-30-2019
(04-30-2019, 08:25 PM)tomh009 Wrote: Hmmm. Acitta's images don't display for me at all. Tried Edge, Firefox and Chrome.
I posted them using Firefox on Linux.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/o5yGUZwTjZJqB4xr7
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - tomh009 - 04-30-2019
(04-30-2019, 08:45 PM)Acitta Wrote:(04-30-2019, 08:25 PM)tomh009 Wrote: Hmmm. Acitta's images don't display for me at all. Tried Edge, Firefox and Chrome.
I posted them using Firefox on Linux.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/o5yGUZwTjZJqB4xr7
I doubt it's a Firefox or Linux problem. The image URL is super long and could have been corrupted. Or else there is a permissions issue (they are hosted on googleusercontent.com, and I have no idea how permissions work there).
This is what it looks like for me, on all three browsers:
And, incidentally, the photos.app.goo.gl link does work. googleusercontent.com does not, however.
RE: The Market Flats | 7 fl | Proposed - taylortbb - 04-30-2019
I think it relates to Google using time-limited URLs for viewing photos. When the URL is copy/pasted it initially works fine, but then the URL expires an hour later. I had no issue seeing Acitta's images when they were first posted, but now I see the same grey denied image that everyone else does. Google Photos just isn't meant to be a public image hosting service.