+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Urban Areas (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours (/showthread.php?tid=8)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - jamincan - 09-28-2020
Brian Doucet has a really good video of a walking tour of downtown Kitchener. It's targeted toward his planning class, but provides some overviews of some of the successes (which we are all probably quite familiar with) but also some of the challenges that have come with that and some of the opportunities as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IfH9slpWSU
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Rainrider22 - 09-28-2020
That was really insightful. Thank you for sharing it...
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Spokes - 09-30-2020
Great video. Worth watching if you haven't
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ac3r - 10-06-2020
Council to decide fate of MEGHQ-FREEPORT, Kitchener's cold war nuclear shelter: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/kitchener-nuclear-bunker-future-unclear-1.5746522
I highly doubt they'd keep it since it is not in the best structural shape, but it's a shame it couldn't be turned into some sort of small history museum. Or, an unusual hotel experience.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - KevinL - 10-06-2020
Too much leakage and asbestos for it to be salvaged, I fear.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 10-06-2020
39 beds -- 36 male and three female. I expect they planned for the three females for typing and cooking only. This was the 1960s ...
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - danbrotherston - 10-06-2020
(10-06-2020, 03:41 PM)tomh009 Wrote: 39 beds -- 36 male and three female. I expect they planned for the three females for typing and cooking only. This was the 1960s ...
Otherwise known as...the time Conservatives would like to go back to. They have a really small tent.
Still, this is a neat building, I feel like the cheapest and best option would be to securely fence it off, and put up a plaque describing the history (all of it), and just let it decay naturally.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ijmorlan - 10-06-2020
(10-06-2020, 05:06 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: … cheapest … securely fence ….
I’m not sure those are compatible.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - danbrotherston - 10-06-2020
(10-06-2020, 05:18 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(10-06-2020, 05:06 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: … cheapest … securely fence ….
I’m not sure those are compatible.
I said "cheapest", not "cheap". The other options are restoration for a million dollars, or demolition for about a quarter million dollars.
Edit: perhaps I should have said “cheaper”, I’m sure there could be cheaper options than a fence with a plaque...for example a fence without a plaque.
A quarter million dollars buys a lot of fencing and plaques.
But maybe I'm wrong, I just don't like either option, both seem unnecessarily expensive for the result.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 10-06-2020
I don't think a fence would enough to secure it. You would need to weld (or something similar) the doors closed.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ijmorlan - 10-07-2020
(10-06-2020, 07:29 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I said "cheapest", not "cheap". The other options are restoration for a million dollars, or demolition for about a quarter million dollars.
Fair enough. I don’t actually mean to be Mr. Pedantic. The problem is that it is almost impossible to fence off a property really securely. People will break into just about anything. Somebody else suggested welding the door shut; I don’t think that would be enough to deter breakins.
The other issue is that if there is pollution on the site, you don’t really want it to just sit there until the structure decays enough to release it; the materials really should be cleaned up.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - danbrotherston - 10-07-2020
(10-07-2020, 07:51 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:(10-06-2020, 07:29 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I said "cheapest", not "cheap". The other options are restoration for a million dollars, or demolition for about a quarter million dollars.
Fair enough. I don’t actually mean to be Mr. Pedantic. The problem is that it is almost impossible to fence off a property really securely. People will break into just about anything. Somebody else suggested welding the door shut; I don’t think that would be enough to deter breakins.
The other issue is that if there is pollution on the site, you don’t really want it to just sit there until the structure decays enough to release it; the materials really should be cleaned up.
That's true, I think a plaque will actually help with that, I mean, it can at a minimum explain the contamination that is present.
That being said, I am of the opinion that if a good faith effort is made to seal off the property, that the property owner (us) should not be liable for someone who breaks in and gets injured.
As for the structure decaying away, I'm unsure what contaminants are present and in what quantities, at a certain low level, they could just be returned to nature. But remediation of some or all of those materials would be part of any plan anyway.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ijmorlan - 10-07-2020
(10-07-2020, 09:05 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: That being said, I am of the opinion that if a good faith effort is made to seal off the property, that the property owner (us) should not be liable for someone who breaks in and gets injured.
100% yes. There are way too many lawsuits that should be dismissed as frivolous which end up costing the defendant a lot. At least that is my impression. I understand a lot of the worst stuff gets reversed on appeal, but by that time the defendant has already been mugged for many thousands of dollars in legal fees (not, to be clear, by their lawyer, but by the system).
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - clasher - 10-07-2020
Quote:An environmental assessment has determined that mould, lead, asbestos, silica and mercury are all present at the site. There is also extensive structural damage to the building as water has been seeping through the concrete for many years, Allen said.
LOL the building is leaking and full of nasty stuff and y'all just wanna weld the door shut and put up a few signs. Given its proximity to the river ISTM that demolition and remediation of the site is the responsible thing to do.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - danbrotherston - 10-07-2020
(10-07-2020, 01:02 PM)clasher Wrote:Quote:An environmental assessment has determined that mould, lead, asbestos, silica and mercury are all present at the site. There is also extensive structural damage to the building as water has been seeping through the concrete for many years, Allen said.
LOL the building is leaking and full of nasty stuff and y'all just wanna weld the door shut and put up a few signs. Given its proximity to the river ISTM that demolition and remediation of the site is the responsible thing to do.
I don't know how much material is on site here, there is certainly no evidence I've seen that the building is "full" of nasty stuff--this isn't a factory which contaminated the surrounding areas over decades. Mercury could easily just mean a tiny amount from fluroescent light bulbs and thermometers. That stuff is easy to clean up. I'm not even sure asbestos counts as environmental contamination...it's a natural mineral found in the ground...it just happens to be unsafe for humans when used in building materials that are being broken down or put up. Nobody here is suggesting that environmental contamination be allowed to enter the environment, but this isn't the same as the hundreds of abandoned factor buildings that are so contaminated the ground itself is unsafe to build on.