Waterloo Region Connected
General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Urban Areas (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours (/showthread.php?tid=8)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - CP42 - 12-06-2021

(12-06-2021, 01:39 AM)Acitta Wrote:
(12-05-2021, 11:14 PM)CP42 Wrote: Stumbled across this drone footage of DTK today:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlCSax_vTfE&t=2s

I previously posted it in " Post your pictures of Waterloo Region!".
Ahh, my apologies! I haven’t frequented many areas outside of the land development section!


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Acitta - 12-06-2021

(12-06-2021, 02:30 AM)CP42 Wrote:
(12-06-2021, 01:39 AM)Acitta Wrote: I previously posted it in " Post your pictures of Waterloo Region!".
Ahh, my apologies! I haven’t frequented many areas outside of the land development section!

I always use the "What's New" link, so I follow every thread.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ac3r - 12-12-2021

I was told 18 Pine Street has been purchased by Grand River Hospital for offices or something like that.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - dtkmelissa - 12-14-2021

Not sure if there's a better thread for this or not, but Kitchener considers a vacancy tax. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/kitchener-city-council-vacant-tax-credit-1.6284174


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 12-15-2021

(12-14-2021, 08:09 PM)dtkmelissa Wrote: Not sure if there's a better thread for this or not, but Kitchener considers a vacancy tax. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/kitchener-city-council-vacant-tax-credit-1.6284174

That's excellent news! They should additionally get rid of the discounted property tax rate on vacant land, as that rewards landowners for not developing it.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Belmonster - 12-18-2021

(12-15-2021, 10:29 AM)tomh009 Wrote:
(12-14-2021, 08:09 PM)dtkmelissa Wrote: Not sure if there's a better thread for this or not, but Kitchener considers a vacancy tax. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/kitchener-city-council-vacant-tax-credit-1.6284174

That's excellent news! They should additionally get rid of the discounted property tax rate on vacant land, as that rewards landowners for not developing it.

I'd like to see them consider a vacancy tax for commercial property as well. Maybe there's some reason it's not feasible... But naively, it seems like persistently vacant storefronts impose negative externalities on their neighbors and should be taxed accordingly.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ijmorlan - 12-18-2021

(12-18-2021, 11:17 AM)Belmonster Wrote: I'd like to see them consider a vacancy tax for commercial property as well. Maybe there's some reason it's not feasible... But naively, it seems like persistently vacant storefronts impose negative externalities on their neighbors and should be taxed accordingly.

It’s very hard to write a definition of vacancy which works. Somebody who wants to leave a store vacant will likely be able to have a facade of a store which isn’t really different from an empty store. On the other hand, they presumably would at least have to make it look active even if it’s not; but that’s an improvement on an obviously-vacant storefront.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 12-18-2021

(12-18-2021, 11:30 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(12-18-2021, 11:17 AM)Belmonster Wrote: I'd like to see them consider a vacancy tax for commercial property as well. Maybe there's some reason it's not feasible... But naively, it seems like persistently vacant storefronts impose negative externalities on their neighbors and should be taxed accordingly.

It’s very hard to write a definition of vacancy which works. Somebody who wants to leave a store vacant will likely be able to have a facade of a store which isn’t really different from an empty store. On the other hand, they presumably would at least have to make it look active even if it’s not; but that’s an improvement on an obviously-vacant storefront.

Checking whether a store is actually open is prett easy. Identifying condos that are empty is much more difficult, though.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ijmorlan - 12-18-2021

(12-18-2021, 03:17 PM)tomh009 Wrote: Checking whether a store is actually open is prett easy. Identifying condos that are empty is much more difficult, though.

How many hours a week does it need to be open? What if it’s being renovated? Etc.

Not saying it’s impossible, just saying it’s easier said than done.

Also, we need to ask why basic economic incentives aren’t enough. How can it make sense to leave something of high value like a storefront vacant?


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - danbrotherston - 12-18-2021

(12-18-2021, 05:39 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(12-18-2021, 03:17 PM)tomh009 Wrote: Checking whether a store is actually open is prett easy. Identifying condos that are empty is much more difficult, though.

How many hours a week does it need to be open? What if it’s being renovated? Etc.

Not saying it’s impossible, just saying it’s easier said than done.

Also, we need to ask why basic economic incentives aren’t enough. How can it make sense to leave something of high value like a storefront vacant?

Yeah, I mean, I don't think it's necessarily harder to tell than with housing, but certainly it isn't trivial.

As for why high value storefronts are being left vacant, or worse, turned into parking lots...well...you have to look at the perverse incentives our society has...


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Acitta - 12-23-2021

Neighbourhoods need more than just single family houses and towers
Building more housing alone will not solve the supply problem nor make housing more affordable, says UW planning professor.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - YKF - 12-26-2021

I'm not sure whether this has been mentioned before on this site, but there's a 34 unit stacked townhouse listed on realtor.ca at 624 King Street West.
Link: https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/23862364/624-king-street-w-street-w-unit-b15-kitchener

This is very different than the midrise that was floated a few years ago. Very unfortunate if this site gets redeveloped with 34 stacked townhouse units, IMO, rather than something much denser and appropriate for this location.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - CP42 - 12-26-2021

(12-26-2021, 12:02 PM)YKF Wrote: I'm not sure whether this has been mentioned before on this site, but there's a 34 unit stacked townhouse listed on realtor.ca at 624 King Street West.
Link: https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/23862364/624-king-street-w-street-w-unit-b15-kitchener

This is very different than the midrise that was floated a few years ago. Very unfortunate if this site gets redeveloped with 34 stacked townhouse units, IMO, rather than something much denser and appropriate for this location.
I’ve seen this somewhere on here - perhaps the Station Park thread.
It is a shame that there will potentially be such a light use of land right next to one of the densest developments in the area.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 12-26-2021

Stacked townhouses aren't really dramatically lower density than a midrise -- three floors instead of four or five, maybe?


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - LesPio - 12-26-2021

(12-26-2021, 12:02 PM)YKF Wrote: I'm not sure whether this has been mentioned before on this site, but there's a 34 unit stacked townhouse listed on realtor.ca at 624 King Street West.
Link: https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/23862364/624-king-street-w-street-w-unit-b15-kitchener

This is very different than the midrise that was floated a few years ago. Very unfortunate if this site gets redeveloped with 34 stacked townhouse units, IMO, rather than something much denser and appropriate for this location.

This site has been in transition over the past few years. I am questioning the legitimacy of putting this on Realtor.  In my opinion, I would think that the sale of the entire site to a developer with deeper pockets at a higher price like the Benton/Charles empty lot sale would make sense to me.  ie. sell this property for $10 million or more.