+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Urban Areas (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours (/showthread.php?tid=8)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Lens - 03-09-2022
(02-19-2022, 01:04 AM)Lens Wrote: Does anyone know the story of these 3 houses on Courtland at Benton? https://goo.gl/maps/MPePewUtpwmaDKPb7
They're all currently boarded up and vacant.
These were just demolished in the last few days.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - CP42 - 03-11-2022
Views from Charlie West
![[Image: gWbveGC.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/gWbveGC.jpg)
![[Image: 0NgG0iY.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/0NgG0iY.jpg)
![[Image: QdjMcXH.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/QdjMcXH.jpg)
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 03-11-2022
Very nice!
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Rainrider22 - 03-12-2022
I read this article and the overall point is that a high rise on an empty lot will ruin a heritage district. But all I saw was irony as I look at the high rise in the background of the cover picture.
https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/2022/03/12/downtown-development-wave-splashes-against-heritage-district.html
What's that saying, "a picture is worth a thousand words" enough said.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - danbrotherston - 03-12-2022
(03-12-2022, 08:51 AM)Rainrider22 Wrote: I read this article and the overall point is that a high rise on an empty lot will ruin a heritage district. But all I saw was irony as I look at the high rise in the background of the cover picture.
https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/2022/03/12/downtown-development-wave-splashes-against-heritage-district.html
What's that saying, "a picture is worth a thousand words" enough said.
Attachments are still broken, so I can't post a picture.
Apparently attachments do work when I actually post this, but it looked like they weren't working.
But I have a picture of a house with a sign opposing this which literally backs onto both those highrises.
These people have no scruples.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Rainrider22 - 03-12-2022
Omg.....that is even better !!!
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Acitta - 03-12-2022
I am shocked, shocked I tell you, that developers want to destroy a heritage parking lot! LOL
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Rainrider22 - 03-12-2022
(03-12-2022, 12:48 PM)Acitta Wrote: I am shocked, shocked I tell you, that developers want to destroy a heritage parking lot! LOL
I too am shocked !
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - dtkvictim - 03-12-2022
(03-12-2022, 09:17 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: But I have a picture of a house with a sign opposing this which literally backs onto both those highrises.
These people have no scruples.
Not to defend this group of NIMBYS but: Where you see irony and hypocrisy in this sign, you can just as easily see the most experienced and affected individual on the matter.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Rainrider22 - 03-12-2022
For me the irony is the high rise in the background. They have been present for a great many years without comprimising the integrity of that heritage community. Additionally, there is a much higher building proposed right across the road...
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - panamaniac - 03-12-2022
(03-12-2022, 01:42 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote: For me the irony is the high rise in the background. They have been present for a great many years without comprimising the integrity of that heritage community. Additionally, there is a much higher building proposed right across the road...
Some would see them as the most prominent among a number of developments and demolitions over the years that have left the neighbourhood's heritage status hanging by a thread. What is gone from that part of town was more impressive than most of what remains. I have no objection to the new proposal, but we'll see how it plays out. This is a strong community group so we may see the developer knock a few storeys off it.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - dtkvictim - 03-12-2022
(03-12-2022, 01:42 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote: For me the irony is the high rise in the background. They have been present for a great many years without comprimising the integrity of that heritage community. Additionally, there is a much higher building proposed right across the road...
I get the irony. My point is that the individual living in the shadow of that highrise might directly feel that the building has been compromising the quality of the neighbourhood (for heritage reasons or otherwise) for all these years. Being so close to it perhaps gives them that most informed opinion.
Using an existing highrise as justification for another one also gives ammunition to the common slippery slope argument of "If we allow this one, we've opened the floodgates. How many more will follow?". Especially when the common rebuttal to that argument, including from folks on this forum, is that it's just one tower... we aren't Manhattan or Toronto after all.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - danbrotherston - 03-12-2022
(03-12-2022, 01:29 PM)dtkvictim Wrote:(03-12-2022, 09:17 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: But I have a picture of a house with a sign opposing this which literally backs onto both those highrises.
These people have no scruples.
Not to defend this group of NIMBYS but: Where you see irony and hypocrisy in this sign, you can just as easily see the most experienced and affected individual on the matter.
No...NO...
The MOST affected and experienced individual on this matter is the person desperately trying to afford rent, or who is unable to afford rent.
Not some wealthy homeowner who objects to living near an apartment building.
I am always so frustrated by how invisible that group of people is treated.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - danbrotherston - 03-12-2022
(03-12-2022, 03:23 PM)panamaniac Wrote:(03-12-2022, 01:42 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote: For me the irony is the high rise in the background. They have been present for a great many years without comprimising the integrity of that heritage community. Additionally, there is a much higher building proposed right across the road...
Some would see them as the most prominent among a number of developments and demolitions over the years that have left the neighbourhood's heritage status hanging by a thread. What is gone from that part of town was more impressive than most of what remains. I have no objection to the new proposal, but we'll see how it plays out. This is a strong community group so we may see the developer knock a few storeys off it.
But that is the point.
Knocking a few stories off this development does NOTHING for heritage (and why would it, heritage is a bullshit argument, especially here).
But what it will do is represent a few dozen families in the margins who are now unable to find housing.
I hate that fake compromise so much....
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ac3r - 03-12-2022
(03-12-2022, 05:31 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:(03-12-2022, 03:23 PM)panamaniac Wrote: Some would see them as the most prominent among a number of developments and demolitions over the years that have left the neighbourhood's heritage status hanging by a thread. What is gone from that part of town was more impressive than most of what remains. I have no objection to the new proposal, but we'll see how it plays out. This is a strong community group so we may see the developer knock a few storeys off it.
But that is the point.
Knocking a few stories off this development does NOTHING for heritage (and why would it, heritage is a bullshit argument, especially here).
But what it will do is represent a few dozen families in the margins who are now unable to find housing.
I hate that fake compromise so much....
I disagree with this. Preserving the heritage of areas of cities is an important thing to do. New developments can in fact destroy a neighbourhood. I don't think most people would disagree that if Venice suddenly started building massive condos and skyscrapers, it would be very detrimental to the city. Or for a more relatable comparison, all the new construction you see in China or Japan only happened by destroying the historic fabric of those cities.
It's all subjective of course and one can argue that heritage can coexist with the contemporary (and I believe it can), but suggesting the preservation of cultural, neighbourhood and architectural heritage is bullshit in terms of blocking new developments is wrong and can have negative impacts on an area. Of course, in this case I don't believe for one second that this proposed project will do any harm, but due to the subjective experience each person has in their cities, their voices are worth hearing out.
Heritage is a very important thing. As an Indigenous person, I could argue that all the settlers who came here destroyed our cultural heritage (both the intangible and tangible). Waterloo Region - Canada - only exists because you guys came here and decided that our heritage was not worth preservation and much of who we are has been destroyed. I know that's an odd argument to use but it helps illustrate why certain groups of people get wary when history is destroyed for something new. It's possible to have both, you just need compromises.
That said, given that downtown has always had tall buildings, their argument against this project is junk. More so because they are wanting to protect an actual parking lot. But at the same time, it's possible to develop cities without the need for highrises and skyscrapers everywhere. European cities are a great example. Many of them have high density, but many also prevent the construction of tall buildings in order to preserve the historic fabric of the area. Our cities would need to reconsider zoning rules, but you can achieve high density without the need for towering buildings everywhere.