![]() |
|
Cycling in Waterloo Region - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Cycling in Waterloo Region (/showthread.php?tid=186) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
|
RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - dtkvictim - 08-13-2024 (08-12-2024, 06:03 PM)Bytor Wrote:(08-12-2024, 05:32 PM)dtkvictim Wrote: Some of these pictures are bit old, but the only thing that changed is the paint was added. The block between Francis and Water hasn't had the top coat added for some reason, so it's been pretty rough for a few weeks now. I mean, this might be true, but then why isn't it an issue for the other block between Victoria and Francis? It was does at the same time, and you can see in my photos that it's clearly fully paved. It's not really the missing top coat that's my issue. It's that they spill chunks of asphalt all over that are easy for thin bike tires to slip on and the transitions are pretty painful. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - dtkvictim - 08-13-2024 (08-13-2024, 03:17 PM)neonjoe Wrote:(08-13-2024, 02:56 PM)cherrypark Wrote: Unclear on if that cross ride on the north side of the Duke/Victoria intersection means that that sidewalk is a theoretical cycling route or MUT? The rest looks great and is a welcome improvement, however much I wish it went the whole way down Duke.I would suspect that that portion is on hold pending the construction of the transit hub. I think the Victoria St MUT is decoupled from the transit hub itself: https://www.engagewr.ca/victoria-street-modifications So we may see that built first. I can't remember where I read this (maybe on UrbanToronto) but I recall the track works and platform relocation (which will close Duke St to cars) is Metrolinx's responsibility and will happen before the transit hub itself is built. So in other words, all of the active transportation benefits don't depend on the transit hub. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - ac3r - 08-13-2024 (08-12-2024, 05:32 PM)dtkvictim Wrote: How does this differ from a sidewalk? Wouldn't it just be cheaper to let cyclists legally use existing sidewalks - especially since most cyclists ride on the sidewalk anyway? Really, is it a big deal? Do you regularly hear on the news stories about horrific bike and pedestrian crashes that take place on sidewalks? Of course not. A lot of the "multi-use trails" don't make sense. Sure some are wider - especially downtown, we're just turning the whole place into a sea of concrete and asphalt, nice...I mean look at that, it looks like shit - but many of them aren't. By definition, pedestrians can use them and thousands do each day. Why is sharing a space with pedestrians okay if you call it a "multi-use trail" but not okay if it's a sidewalk? Trails are good but what the hell was the point in spending millions of dollars just to pour some asphalt and paint it? Pic related. Barely anyone walks here, let alone cycles. The sidewalks were just fine to handle both. I look at these pictures and think wow they are just burning my money in front of me instead of using it for something important. This is not to say trails are bad, but whoever is demanding, designing and approving these needs to be shot into the sun. ![]() RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 08-13-2024 (08-13-2024, 10:55 AM)tomh009 Wrote:(08-13-2024, 10:03 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: The depth of the freezing is clearly different but we do get frost on the ground some days. The point is though, that frost on pavement can only occur when some portion of the ground is frozen. Frost cannot occur on surfaces that are above 0C. As for the rest, I know this is what engineers say, but given how much of our road engineering is known to be...at best, unjustified by data...I really wonder how important this really is. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - bravado - 08-13-2024 (08-13-2024, 04:43 PM)ac3r Wrote: How does this differ from a sidewalk? Wouldn't it just be cheaper to let cyclists legally use existing sidewalks - especially since most cyclists ride on the sidewalk anyway? Really, is it a big deal? Do you regularly hear on the news stories about horrific bike and pedestrian crashes that take place on sidewalks? Of course not. Pedestrian v Cyclist conflict is actually really common, it just doesn't end with trips to the hospital. People complain about bikes and pedestrians sharing space all the time and there's no reason for it other than cheapness and not wanting to take any space away from vehicles. You are right though - multi-use trails are a bad compromise that annoys everyone that uses them. We should always separate modes of transit, but one 4-wheeled group refuses to compromise on space and budgets. If you have to avoid people's dogs and pedestrians with headphones and kids running in front of you to get to the store on a bike, you just won't choose to do it. Since we want people to cycle, they should have a dedicated space for it. I've been yelled at a bunch of times by boomers on empty paved park paths just for existing on 2 wheels in the same space as them. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - dtkvictim - 08-13-2024 (08-13-2024, 04:43 PM)ac3r Wrote: How does this differ from a sidewalk? Wouldn't it just be cheaper to let cyclists legally use existing sidewalks - especially since most cyclists ride on the sidewalk anyway? Really, is it a big deal? Do you regularly hear on the news stories about horrific bike and pedestrian crashes that take place on sidewalks? Of course not. It's designated space. Would you say the same thing about painted bike lanes on the road? The only difference is whether they are at road level or sidewalk level (and the safety that comes with that). You aren't entirely wrong, but sidewalks as we build them are wholly inadequate for 1) cycling, and 2) sharing space with pedestrians and cyclists. The continuous breaks in the sidewalk are unpleasant to ride on. The width of a standard sidewalk makes even 2 people walking past each other about the limit, add more people are bicycles which need a bit more width, and it doesn't work. People do constantly complain about this when cyclists use sidewalks. (08-13-2024, 04:43 PM)ac3r Wrote: Why is sharing a space with pedestrians okay if you call it a "multi-use trail" but not okay if it's a sidewalk? Again, they have different dimensions. I'm not aware of a single multi-use trail that's anywhere near as narrow as a standard sidewalk. Secondary to that, it's about traffic volumes. I do think this stretch is low volume enough that a MUT would have been fine to be honest, but it's not always the case. I don't think a MUT would have worked on Water St, and a sidewalk definitely wouldn't. People (both cyclists and especially pedestrians) are also much more likely to keep right when a centerline is painted. (08-13-2024, 04:43 PM)ac3r Wrote: especially downtown, we're just turning the whole place into a sea of concrete and asphalt, nice...I mean look at that, it looks like shit The only point a really agree with here, but you've singled out probably the worst justification possible. You're aware the street used to look like this, right? ![]() It was already a sea of concrete and asphalt. That said, while they didn't make things worse, our management of greenspace and beauty is pretty appalling. This random street I dropped into in NL (excluding the access road on the left) has basically the same width as Duke St at this part. While it has one less sidewalk, it manages to fit in 2 rows of trees, and still has a floating bus stop.
RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - cherrypark - 08-14-2024 Yes but having trees and boulevards might require lanes to be narrower and money be invested into the public realm and roadways that are not directly convertible to level of service increases... There is zero reason the Lofts side of Duke here couldn't look like this and has nothing to do with the bike lane being at sidewalk level. The suggestion that sidewalks suffice for riding a bike are completely unserious. The MUTs that turn into cross-walks at every cross road are already illogical enough... RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - Bytor - 08-19-2024 (08-13-2024, 10:55 AM)tomh009 Wrote:(08-13-2024, 10:03 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: The depth of the freezing is clearly different but we do get frost on the ground some days. To elaborate, if you put the second layer of asphalt on too soon before enough settling has occurred, not only can you get the uneven pavement I was talking about, but the layers of asphalt can also potentially decouple, or the bottom layer can decouple from the stones and sand below. It's not very much, millimetres, but that is now a gap that water can get into. As we all know, water expands when it freezes. That freezing causes the asphalt to buckle and crack, letting in more water.Also, if the water can drain fast enough from the gap it will carry some of the sand and smaller stones with it, leaving a bigger gap for more ice to freeze inside and cause a great amount of frost heave. Multiple cycles of that is what causes potholes. It's going to happen eventually, but putting on the top coat too soon can make it happen in only a few years rather than 20 years. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - cherrypark - 09-11-2024 To the small but dedicated 2-wheelers on here: CycleWR is organizing a Sep 20 (Fri) group ride from Victoria Park to Forest Heights and back to TWB Brewing that will pass by some of the new (and upcoming) infra talked about on here. If you are interested, more details here: CycleWR September Group Ride RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - bravado - 09-11-2024 The last group ride was an hour or so around east Kitchener and also ended at a brewery for chat and drinks. Best go while the weather is still good! RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - dtkvictim - 10-29-2024 Current state of the Duke cycle tracks east of Frederick. Should be usable pretty soon - if only they actually connected to the downtown grid... ![]() ![]() ![]()
RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - ZEBuilder - 10-29-2024 (10-29-2024, 09:03 PM)dtkvictim Wrote: Current state of the Duke cycle tracks east of Frederick. Should be usable pretty soon - if only they actually connected to the downtown grid... Now we just wait for Ford and the rest of his hooligans to force us to rip it out along with the rest of the grid for that matter because cars are king in Ontario and everyone else doesn't matter. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - dtkvictim - 10-29-2024 (10-29-2024, 09:12 PM)ZEBuilder Wrote:(10-29-2024, 09:03 PM)dtkvictim Wrote: Current state of the Duke cycle tracks east of Frederick. Should be usable pretty soon - if only they actually connected to the downtown grid... It's not along his commute to Queens Park, so hopefully it's safe with our council. Although KW bike lanes have been called out specifically (https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/waterloo-region-kitchener-reaction-bike-lanes-province-approval-1.7353983). It's insane to me to see Joseph St called out, when it seems to be quite popular from my observations. It's pretty normal for me to see more bicycles than cars on a trip down Joseph. The claim of traffic backing up on Joseph seems like an outright fabrication too. I've almost never seen more than 1-2 cars waiting at a light other than a few light cycles right at 5pm as some parking lots empty out. I understand why Cedar St gets complaints from car users (particularly trying to access the market, or properties south of King), but the complaint about the cycle track's low usage don't hold water until it's actually been connected properly to the downtown grid (if that will ever happen with the Duke St debacle). RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - dscurtis - 11-04-2024 I took a few photos yesterday of the East Ave Reconstruction at Chapel Street in Kitchener. Continuous sidewalks/cycle tracks at the intersection: ![]() ![]() View of the cycle tracks facing south from that intersection. The up-and-down caused by the driveways is a bit annoying, perhaps they could've ran a depressed curb along the entire street and used something else to provide safe separation like "concrete blocks" (ex: on Bridgeport in Uptown) and/or bollards? But regardless, cycle tracks are greatly appreciated!
RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - dtkvictim - 11-04-2024 The continuous sidewalks are a great addition. I hope it's something that even the opposition to bike lanes can appreciate and approve of. But holy, why do we have to have so much pavement? I'm not sure if the darkest part is supposed to be for a bus shelter (ok if it is), but at least the lighter grey parts could have plants. Regarding the bumpiness, that wasn't an issue at all that I can recall on Highland Rd E. I wonder why it was done differently here. I guess in the case of Highland, the sidewalks were directly adjacent to the bike lanes and could handle more of the gradient up to the existing lawn. |