(04-18-2024, 08:36 PM)panamaniac Wrote:

(04-18-2024, 08:34 PM)Acitta Wrote: Maybe GRR could buy that derelict building on Madison next to the tracks. I am tired of looking at it when I go by on Stirling. It needs to be either demolished or fixed up and used for something.

You mean the old Robson Lang Tannery?   I suspect that site is too toxic to be put to any use involving humans.

(04-18-2024, 08:39 PM)Acitta Wrote:

(04-18-2024, 08:36 PM)panamaniac Wrote: You mean the old Robson Lang Tannery?   I suspect that site is too toxic to be put to any use involving humans.

I don't know what it was originally. It has been derelict for a long time, certainly for the 5 years that I have been living near it on Stirling.

(04-18-2024, 08:36 PM)panamaniac Wrote:

(04-18-2024, 08:34 PM)Acitta Wrote: Maybe GRR could buy that derelict building on Madison next to the tracks. I am tired of looking at it when I go by on Stirling. It needs to be either demolished or fixed up and used for something.

You mean the old Robson Lang Tannery?   I suspect that site is too toxic to be put to any use involving humans.

(04-18-2024, 09:34 PM)panamaniac Wrote:

(04-18-2024, 08:39 PM)Acitta Wrote: I don't know what it was originally. It has been derelict for a long time, certainly for the 5 years that I have been living near it on Stirling.

I could tell you stories of the railcars and tanks full of slimy, fetid green tannery waste leaking all over the ground, but you'd think I was exaggerating.  I don't know what substances are used in the leather tanning process, but I can't see the site as being anything other than heavily contaminated.

(04-19-2024, 06:48 AM)nms Wrote:

(04-18-2024, 08:36 PM)panamaniac Wrote: You mean the old Robson Lang Tannery?   I suspect that site is too toxic to be put to any use involving humans.

They made it work for the Lang Tannery building downtown...

(01-10-2024, 01:24 AM)taylortbb Wrote:

(01-10-2024, 01:06 AM)ZEBuilder Wrote: The developer is Falco Group, they've been around for awhile but it appears that they just hold land and flip it.

I'm glad, hopefully whoever buys this land totally re-designs the project. Putting a huge blank wall along the Victoria St sidewalk is crazy, as if Victoria St wasn't already pedestrian hostile enough. I get that the grade change is difficult, but there are undeniably better solutions.

(01-10-2024, 10:23 AM)Chris Wrote: Mei King is going to be so busy! Or they realize they are sitting on a goldmine and sell off to retire.

(01-10-2024, 03:32 PM)cherrypark Wrote: Big ups for both a potential start to redeveloping those lots along Victoria and sending a bit of density out that way with good connections to new infra and transit routes.

Also love to see someone proposing a building (to be realized or not) with some street wall apartments instead of the commonly dead floors 2-6 for parking podiums we keep seeing built.