Waterloo Region Connected
GO Transit - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: GO Transit (/showthread.php?tid=12)



RE: GO Transit - Bureaucromancer - 06-23-2019

(06-23-2019, 12:25 AM)jwilliamson Wrote:
(06-22-2019, 11:54 PM)Bureaucromancer Wrote: If re-building lines is in the picture my hope is that we can reuse the Cambridge to Paris Rail Trail and on to Brantford. Create a DMU service running Guelph - Cambridge - Paris - Brantford - Hamilton with the obvious connections to Kitchener and Lakeshore trains.

If it's a newly built line and not being shared with a freight company, wouldn't it make more sense to build an electrified line and run EMUs?

It would be nice, yes, but on the one hand I suspect ridership will be on the low end, and on the other I would prefer not to have to build new from Brantford into Hamilton. I like the concept of the corridor, but realistically if such a project is to have any chance of actually being built reducing the initial captial expenditure is going to have to be a very high priority,

Even ignroing that, this doesn't seem like a place that fighting CN over electrification of a shared line is worthwhile to me given the demand and frequency that would seem reasonable, which also suggests to me that experimenting with battery electric or Hydrogen could be appropriate.


RE: GO Transit - jamincan - 06-23-2019

I know this is something that only lives in your head, but I would fight tooth and nail a line on the rail trail.


RE: GO Transit - Bureaucromancer - 06-23-2019

You understand the PURPOSE of rail-trails is to preserve the corridors?!

Where do you suggest we do OTHER than the trail?


RE: GO Transit - ijmorlan - 06-23-2019

(06-23-2019, 05:23 PM)Bureaucromancer Wrote: You understand the PURPOSE of rail-trails is to preserve the corridors?!

Where do you suggest we do OTHER than the trail?

The purpose of rail trails is to be long distance recreational trails. Using rights-of-way that already exist is often an easy way of doing it, easier than trying to establish new routes. Also, railway routes are low slope and usually fairly direct. And the fact that it preserves the existing route is good, but not the actual purpose of building the rail trail.

Having said that, the presence of a trail shouldn’t be an absolute bar to re-installing rails. On the other hand, it should be possible to keep the trail and install rails in most cases — how many railway rights-of-way are so narrow that there is no extra space for a trail? But this will involve more expense, depending on the terrain and other considerations.


RE: GO Transit - danbrotherston - 06-23-2019

(06-23-2019, 08:02 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(06-23-2019, 05:23 PM)Bureaucromancer Wrote: You understand the PURPOSE of rail-trails is to preserve the corridors?!

Where do you suggest we do OTHER than the trail?

The purpose of rail trails is to be long distance recreational trails. Using rights-of-way that already exist is often an easy way of doing it, easier than trying to establish new routes. Also, railway routes are low slope and usually fairly direct. And the fact that it preserves the existing route is good, but not the actual purpose of building the rail trail.

Having said that, the presence of a trail shouldn’t be an absolute bar to re-installing rails. On the other hand, it should be possible to keep the trail and install rails in most cases — how many railway rights-of-way are so narrow that there is no extra space for a trail? But this will involve more expense, depending on the terrain and other considerations.

You should tell this to CN...their response is pretty funny.

Really though, rail is not magic, there are reasons to use it, but there are also reasons to use a bus.  Having frequent bussing along the route discussed is probably a far stronger business case than building a train.


RE: GO Transit - KevinT - 06-24-2019

(06-23-2019, 06:25 AM)jamincan Wrote: I know this is something that only lives in your head, but I would fight tooth and nail a line on the rail trail.

That's the beauty of the Branchton sub*, unlike the Lake Erie & Northern from Cambridge to Paris it's not yet a recreational trail.

*Correction/edit: It was part of the CN Fergus sub, although originally it was the Galt Branch of the Great Western Railway.


RE: GO Transit - ijmorlan - 06-24-2019

(06-23-2019, 08:49 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: You should tell this to CN...their response is pretty funny.

It’s about what the LRT authority in question thinks, not CN.

I agree CN would probably want the trail about 100m from the tracks. LRT people would probably be more reasonable.


RE: GO Transit - KevinL - 07-17-2019

Apparently due to some huge conference in Toronto on the weekend, GO has such demand that trains will operate from Kitchener this Saturday and Sunday (albeit very early in the morning). The capability is there, it turns out!


RE: GO Transit - jwilliamson - 07-18-2019

(07-17-2019, 04:42 PM)KevinL Wrote: Apparently due to some huge conference in Toronto on the weekend, GO has such demand that trains will operate from Kitchener this Saturday and Sunday (albeit very early in the morning). The capability is there, it turns out!

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/kitchener-getting-extra-go-train-service-this-weekend-1.5214829

It's a Jehovah's Witnesses conference. 45000 attendees.


RE: GO Transit - MidTowner - 07-18-2019

45,000 delegates will be traveling to the Jehovah's Witness international convention, apparently.

This is terribly exciting. I'd be really curious about how this came about. The Go site says that the trips are to "accommodate a significant number of advanced GO train ticket bookings that have been made." But you can't just book a train ticket on a service that doesn't exist- do the organizers contact Go in cases like this?

You're right: the capability exists. It can be done. We could get it on more Saturdays in the summer, potentially.


RE: GO Transit - ijmorlan - 07-18-2019

(07-18-2019, 07:13 AM)MidTowner Wrote: This is terribly exciting. I'd be really curious about how this came about. The Go site says that the trips are to "accommodate a significant number of advanced GO train ticket bookings that have been made." But you can't just book a train ticket on a service that doesn't exist- do the organizers contact Go in cases like this?

I wonder if they mean bus bookings? I can imagine that if they suddenly had a thousand or so bookings on a bus they might move them all to a train rather than trying to dig up 25 buses to move everybody.


RE: GO Transit - SammyOES - 07-18-2019

This is awesome. I don't understand why stuff like this doesn't happen more often.

Like partner for a Jays game. Or pick a day in the summer when you can take the train and spend an afternoon downtown. And so on. Just like any effort at all to grow the base of people using GO.


RE: GO Transit - danbrotherston - 07-18-2019

(07-18-2019, 10:02 AM)SammyOES Wrote: This is awesome.  I don't understand why stuff like this doesn't happen more often.

Like partner for a Jays game.  Or pick a day in the summer when you can take the train and spend an afternoon downtown.  And so on.  Just like any effort at all to grow the base of people using GO.

I think all transit agencies could benefit from this. GRT has done it a few times.  They regularly run more buses to Elmira for the Maple Syrup Festival, and they also (tried) to coordinate and run extra service around Canada Day when the LRT launched.

But really, this should happen for basically every big event.


RE: GO Transit - jamincan - 07-18-2019

I thought GO had done this before as well, for the CNE, maybe?


RE: GO Transit - MidTowner - 07-18-2019

I know that they do with some regularity on the Lakeshore West line (there were quite a few extra trips during the Pan Aam games, for instance). Have they don't it before here? I don't recall the CNE trips.