+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: GO Transit (/showthread.php?tid=12)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
RE: GO Transit - KevinL - 05-06-2020
Upgrades in Guelph continue at a steady pace - there's a great post here on Urban Toronto, with lots of pics.
RE: GO Transit - ac3r - 07-18-2020
Metrolinx to provide update on Guelph, Waterloo region GO Train expansion
RE: GO Transit - tomh009 - 07-18-2020
I believe (more or less) normal GO Train service is due to be restored in September.
RE: GO Transit - KevinL - 07-19-2020
Probably less frequency on university-focused routes, but otherwise pretty normal, I'd bet.
RE: GO Transit - trainspotter139 - 07-23-2020
Plans underway to upgrade Kitchener GO to electric trains
Quote:KITCHENER -- Metrolinx has laid out its early plans to electrify the Kitchener GO line.
The provincially owned transit provider is moving closer to upgrading the line from diesel-powered trains to electrical ones.However before the work goes forward, it will go to the public for consultation.The project will cover 54 kilometres of rail line from Georgetown to Kitchener. It will require converting the stretch from conventional rail to a line with overhead power lines.Metrolinx says electric trains are quieter, safer, faster and more efficient than the current diesel option.An overhead power system will be similar to the ION lines.The project will need at least two large power stations, one in Kitchener at Shirley Avenue and another one in Guelph, east of Highway 6 near Paisley Road.The plans also need to work around 10 bridges and overpasses. Only two of those will need special attention, including the Margaret Avenue bridge. Metrolinx said it may need to lower the track and make other modifications at that bridge.Metrolinx hopes to have firm plans in place by 2021, allowing work to begin.
RE: GO Transit - westwardloo - 07-23-2020
Well this is welcoming news! Glad to see they are potentially going ahead with electrification all the way to Kitchener. I thought for some reason they were only going to electrify the line to Brampton.
RE: GO Transit - danbrotherston - 07-23-2020
(07-23-2020, 09:03 AM)westwardloo Wrote: Well this is welcoming news! Glad to see they are potentially going ahead with electrification all the way to Kitchener. I thought for some reason they were only going to electrify the line to Brampton.
I'm not sure we will have the whole line electrified, the quote suggests they will end at Georgetown, which is where Metrolinx's ownership of the line ends. AFAIK CN will not permit electrification of their freight tracks, and Metrolinx has given up on purchasing CN's freight alignment from Georgetown on. So I'm guessing we'll still be using stupid dual mode locomotives.
RE: GO Transit - jamincan - 07-23-2020
Just to clarify, because I was initially confused - Metrolinx owns the track from Georgetown to Kitchener, but CN owns the track between Georgetown and Bramalea. The only other parts of the GO Network they don't own are the parts of Lakeshore West past Burlington, the Milton Line, and the Richmond Hill Line in York Region.
RE: GO Transit - tomh009 - 07-23-2020
(07-23-2020, 06:16 AM)trainspotter139 Wrote:The plans also need to work around 10 bridges and overpasses. Only two of those will need special attention, including the Margaret Avenue bridge. Metrolinx said it may need to lower the track and make other modifications at that bridge.
I guess electrification wasn't considered when they rebuilt the Margaret Ave bridge!
That said, this is good news, even if partial electrification is less than ideal.
RE: GO Transit - jamincan - 07-23-2020
Wasn't it considered and they decided not to accommodate it?
RE: GO Transit - clasher - 07-23-2020
I thought the whole freight bypass thing the Ford gov't cancelled was supposed to make it easier to electrify the whole line?
RE: GO Transit - Bytor - 07-23-2020
(07-23-2020, 12:06 PM)clasher Wrote: I thought the whole freight bypass thing the Ford gov't cancelled was supposed to make it easier to electrify the whole line?
Nope. Not at all. Only supposedly less expensive to implement #2WADGO. It actually makes it harder to do it as electrified rail because of continuing to share tracks with CN.
Another supposed reason was because it would let them do it sooner than what the Liberals promised, but no timelines coming out of Metrolinx have change from the Wynne government promises.
RE: GO Transit - Chris - 07-23-2020
(07-23-2020, 10:43 AM)jamincan Wrote: Wasn't it considered and they decided not to accommodate it?
I can't recall for sure if electrification was under consideration but they did consider widening the span to allow for another track or two for future expansion. That widening was turned down.
RE: GO Transit - danbrotherston - 07-23-2020
(07-23-2020, 01:23 PM)Bytor Wrote:(07-23-2020, 12:06 PM)clasher Wrote: I thought the whole freight bypass thing the Ford gov't cancelled was supposed to make it easier to electrify the whole line?
Nope. Not at all. Only supposedly less expensive to implement #2WADGO. It actually makes it harder to do it as electrified rail because of continuing to share tracks with CN.
Another supposed reason was because it would let them do it sooner than what the Liberals promised, but no timelines coming out of Metrolinx have change from the Wynne government promises.
Indeed, it was never about better, it was about "cheaper" and allegedly faster.
The faster is dubious, there are zero timelines, and even if everything went right from now on, I don't believe they could do it before 2025 which was the liberals target too...of course, whether the liberals would hit their target, I don't know.
There's a reasonable argument to be made about tradeoffs, whether the bypass was worth it.
But I think it's really really hard to justify electrification when you will still need dual mode locomotives with a short section in the middle missing.
This is, frankly, the problem I have with most consevative party supporters, I certainly don't agree with the policies the liberals implement all the time, I think there are things we waste money on, things that could be done better, like not building a new highway 7, but I do not see the conservatives as doing any better in this regard, they generally just trade slightly worse short term and much worse long term for slightly cheaper. That trade off is only worth it when it can be far faster and vastly cheaper, something I never see from any government. And if they really wanted to talk about wasteful anti-conservative spending, we wouldn't be building highway 7...
RE: GO Transit - jamincan - 07-23-2020
(07-23-2020, 01:30 PM)Chris Wrote:(07-23-2020, 10:43 AM)jamincan Wrote: Wasn't it considered and they decided not to accommodate it?
I can't recall for sure if electrification was under consideration but they did consider widening the span to allow for another track or two for future expansion. That widening was turned down.
Ah, yeah, that's what I was thinking of.