Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 15 Vote(s) - 3.93 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit
(07-10-2019, 07:20 AM)MidTowner Wrote: What people are actually doing, of course: walking up the middle of the platform safely out of the path of the Conestoga-bound train they've just disembarked from, checking to make sure there is no Fairway-bound train approaching from the north, crossing the tracks to the west of the platform where there should have been an exit, and either ducking under the arm or congregating awkwardly around it until it starts to lift.

Or, using the fact a barrier is down blocking eastbound traffic to cross to the median unobstructed. Then they just need to wait for a gap in westbound traffic, and they're across Northfield.
Reply


That part I can abide less. There is a button-activated crosswalk, people should call for it and wait for it to be activated, not jay walk. But I can understand it, because they want to get to the north side and there is an arm keeping them on the track side, and away from the button.

I'm not sure why there need to be arms blocking the sidewalk- the Spur Line certainly doesn't have that elsewhere, and nor do other Ion crossings.
Reply
(07-09-2019, 06:21 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(07-09-2019, 05:51 PM)Coke6pk Wrote: I am sure there are drivers who will accept this challenge....

Coke

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iOi_iPNC50

While the clip was appreciated, I was expecting more along the lines of this:

https://youtu.be/M35xADfSbcE

Coke
Reply
The region has publicly acknowledged the issue with the ATP system. 

Waterloo Region LRT trains slowed by 20 km/h on spur lines because safety system isn’t running
Reply
It seems weird to me how early the crossing arms come down on University and Columbia for ion trains, I was riding up and down the trail in the last few days and was lucky enough to be near a train so it made it very easy to cross both roads when the barriers were down but on University they came down while the train was still in the station in Waterloo Park, seems kind of excessive to me. Pedestrians and cyclists all crossed even though the crossing light doesn't automatically switch to walk when the gates come down and stop traffic.
Reply
(07-10-2019, 11:07 AM)Bob_McBob Wrote: The region has publicly acknowledged the issue with the ATP system. 

Waterloo Region LRT trains slowed by 20 km/h on spur lines because safety system isn’t running

Nice to see, but aren't the ions meeting their schedule already? Does Keolis have any incentive to go faster even if they can get ATP working? Would they just have to wait at the next stations anyway to catch up to the schedule?
Reply
(07-10-2019, 11:23 AM)CuilTard Wrote:
(07-10-2019, 11:07 AM)Bob_McBob Wrote: The region has publicly acknowledged the issue with the ATP system. 

Waterloo Region LRT trains slowed by 20 km/h on spur lines because safety system isn’t running

Nice to see, but aren't the ions meeting their schedule already? Does Keolis have any incentive to go faster even if they can get ATP working? Would they just have to wait at the next stations anyway to catch up to the schedule?

The schedule is set by the region, so they can adjust things. The only problem is the contract has a 46 minute end-to-end time requirement, so as long as it's below that the region can't apply performance standards for late trains. In a different Record article the region seemed to think it would be possible to negotiate with Keolis to change it though.
Reply


My understanding is that Keolis is only responsible for operations, GrandLinq would be the one to deal with programming/tuning/changing the automation, then setting the conditions that Keolis' operators must follow accordingly.
...K
Reply
I'm sure incentives can be added for quicker trains (within safety limits), that could work.

I spotted Tom Galloway on the Northfield platform this morning, looks like he's getting a direct and personal look at things.
Reply
(07-09-2019, 06:40 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(07-09-2019, 06:19 PM)jeffster Wrote: But her response was "I didn't see you".

Right, the problem is that she didn’t see you; and she didn’t see you because she didn’t look. Whether or not her car actually came to a full stop is irrelevant. I would never roll a stop in that situation; I would see that there are other cars and stop. It sounds like she needed to wait anyway. But if one can determine that it is safe to proceed before one has finished stopping (for example, because there is no-one anywhere nearby at all), then what is the stop for? It’s just a legally-required ritual with no real-world effect.

I take a similar approach to crossing, as a pedestrian, against a red hand. The rule is different from crossing on a walking person. When it is a walking person, the rule is “is it safe?”. When it is a red hand, the rule is “can any vehicle traffic easily observe me violating their right of way?”. This is very different, and basically means that I won’t cross unless I’m confident that no driver will even have to worry about the fact that I’m crossing. By the time they would even start thinking about what I’m doing, I am already well away from the intersection. This implies of course that I don’t actually cross against a red hand very often, except in a few locations with excellent visibility and very simple traffic flow such as University at the LRT tracks.

But that's the problem -- people not stopping fully and then checking are creating accidents. Stoping and checking requires you to use your brain, slowing and simply checking doesn't work the same way.

You see a lot of pedestrians being run over at intersections because someone going right on a red (or at a stop sign) and not stopping and checking first, they're slowing and checking at the same time, so you don't have the same focus of your surroundings. As for when it comes to pedestrians "Is it safe" when you have the "walking person (or at a stop sign)" the answer is always "NO" if there are any cars present, since 90% of drivers disobey 'who has rights'. It's never, ever safe to cross at an intersection because drivers don't know the rules of the road, including STOPPING and CHECKING at red lights and stop signs. My last scare was when I was crossing with the "Walking Person" when some dickhead decided it was OK to go through the red light (straight through) and almost hit me. I now mostly 'jay walk' because I have control as to whether or not I am hit.

My driving has changed too, if I see a school bus I pull far right as possible, so as to let any asshole pass the bus if that's their desire, and I'll do whatever I can to avoid being rear-ended when stopping/pulling over an EMS. Obviously KW has some very important people that it is so urgent to get to their destination that it's OK to ignore traffic laws. I'm just, sadly, not important enough (except to my kids).
Reply
The way I see it, stop signs should be used to say "hey, this intersection is kind of tricky, and you're going to need to stop and take a look before you go ahead and drive through." But too often stop signs are used to say "hey, could you please slow down a bit?". People get used to ignoring the second kind, and when they get to the first kind, they don't know it's dangerous to not stop.
Reply
Markster has a good thread highlighting all of the access issues at the stations.

One that I can't believe I wouldn't have thought of, but know I would never have: Northfield can only be accessed from the north end, and is fenced in to the south. If you are accosted on the platform (which obviously is unlikely, but possible), there is no escape route. I guess that sort of thing is a blind spot for me; it never would have occurred to me.

Anyway, some good points about various stations.
Reply
(07-11-2019, 07:53 AM)MidTowner Wrote: Markster has a good thread highlighting all of the access issues at the stations.

One that I can't believe I wouldn't have thought of, but know I would never have: Northfield can only be accessed from the north end, and is fenced in to the south. If you are accosted on the platform (which obviously is unlikely, but possible), there is no escape route. I guess that sort of thing is a blind spot for me; it never would have occurred to me.

Anyway, some good points about various stations.

I believe the path on the east side of the tracks is the official second exit — cross the tracks at the south end of the platform, walk up the path. There is a similar arrangement at Mill. But obviously, in the situation you are talking about, this form of second exit doesn’t really do the job.

There should be crossings to the west, directly into the Northfield Station development, at both ends of the platform. That would be convenient for people using that location and would also provide a real second exit.
Reply


ijmorlan Wrote:
Quote:I believe the path on the east side of the tracks is the official second exit — cross the tracks at the south end of the platform, walk up the path. There is a similar arrangement at Mill. But obviously, in the situation you are talking about, this form of second exit doesn’t really do the job.

There should be crossings to the west, directly into the Northfield Station development, at both ends of the platform. That would be convenient for people using that location and would also provide a real second exit.

You're right, there should be.

All stations should have had four exits, two at each ends of the platform. Obviously this isn't possible everywhere, but the exceptions should have been exceptional, for clear reasons. Many stations lack one or more exits, which suggests that access simply wasn't a priority.

I wonder if there was a specific reason at Northfield why there was not an exit at the south end of the platform into the "Northfield Crossing" building (owned by Zehr Group). I wouldn't be surprised if the project team ruled it out simply because it was private property, without consulting the property owner.
Reply
Waterloo Region has paid GrandLinq $570 million for Ion
https://www.therecord.com/news-story/949...n-for-ion/
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 14 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links