Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
GO Transit
(04-26-2022, 01:03 PM)Bytor Wrote: Even if you grade separate Silver Junction west of Georgetown, that whole CN-owned bit (the Halton Sub) from there to Bramalea where Metrolinx ownership resumes has too few tracks to accommodate both freight and passenger traffic. Most of it is only 2 tracks, except for about 4km between Brampton and Bramalea GO stations. There's simply not enough to share to make #2WADGO possible.

Yup, which is why the Liberals floated the bypass to begin with - they knew it was the only practical solution.
Reply


(04-26-2022, 01:03 PM)Bytor Wrote:
(04-24-2022, 11:41 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: Do you mean the plan won’t accomplish the stated goals, or that the plan won’t be funded?

It seems obvious to me that if we built the grade separation and did the other improvements, it should then be possible to run the stated service. But it seems equally obvious to me that there is a good chance the government will take forever to provide funding for the plan. So if you’re saying there is no plan to implement the plan, I probably agree with you. If you’re saying the plan, if implemented, wouldn’t accomplish the goal, then I’m confused.

It won't accomplish the stated goals.

Even if you grade separate Silver Junction west of Georgetown, that whole CN-owned bit (the Halton Sub) from there to Bramalea where Metrolinx ownership resumes has too few tracks to accommodate both freight and passenger traffic. Most of it is only 2 tracks, except for about 4km between Brampton and Bramalea GO stations. There's simply not enough to share to make #2WADGO possible.

How many freights do they run? We’re only talking about one passenger train per hour in each direction. One track should be able to handle a train every 30 minutes — one freight and one passenger per hour. If not, we’re doing something wrong and need to do a field trip to Europe to see how it’s done. We seem to need way more tracks here than they do. I believe the issue at the junction has to do with crossing movements, not with the inherent capacity of two tracks in the absence of conflicts between tracks.
Reply
(04-26-2022, 04:59 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(04-26-2022, 01:03 PM)Bytor Wrote: It won't accomplish the stated goals.

Even if you grade separate Silver Junction west of Georgetown, that whole CN-owned bit (the Halton Sub) from there to Bramalea where Metrolinx ownership resumes has too few tracks to accommodate both freight and passenger traffic. Most of it is only 2 tracks, except for about 4km between Brampton and Bramalea GO stations. There's simply not enough to share to make #2WADGO possible.

How many freights do they run? We’re only talking about one passenger train per hour in each direction. One track should be able to handle a train every 30 minutes — one freight and one passenger per hour. If not, we’re doing something wrong and need to do a field trip to Europe to see how it’s done. We seem to need way more tracks here than they do. I believe the issue at the junction has to do with crossing movements, not with the inherent capacity of two tracks in the absence of conflicts between tracks.

It's their main freight rail line, so I'd guess it's quite a few.

That being said, why should a piece of track be able to handle a train every 30 minutes. It depends a lot on the specific trains it is running. Passenger trains should easily run every 30 minutes, because they're relatively short and fast. A single cross country freight train could take 10 minutes to pass. But even more problematic, those trains travel patterns are very different from passenger rail. Even more worse, those trains delay characteristics are different again...our passenger trains are ALREADY delayed due to freight delays, more frequent passenger services will just increase and cascade those delays.

There are two difference between Canada and Europe that apply here I think. For one, Canada runs vastly more freight by rail. I know its surprising for the undisputed king of the motor vehicle, but Europe runs a larger percentage of freight by truck than Canada or the US, so I think we just have more and bigger trains. I don't know how this applies directly to the GTA, but we're talking about a cross continent freight line here, so it probably applies. The other one is of scheduling. Freight trains are generally shorter in Europe which I suspect makes them easier to schedule around, and less prone to delays.

I also don't think you'll find freight sharing tracks with passenger service (at least not frequent passenger service) very often.
Reply
(04-27-2022, 12:41 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: I also don't think you'll find freight sharing tracks with passenger service (at least not frequent passenger service) very often.

Wasn't uncommon to see Swiss freight passing through on passenger platforms, though it wasn't *common* either.
Reply
Quote:The CN Halton Subdivision is a main artery for freight traffic and is important for both CN operations
and the overall Ontario economy. Project development work conducted by Metrolinx determined that
additional track capacity will be required to deliver the proposed service increases. The corridor would
consist of three and four track segments, with two tracks primarily used for freight traffic and the
remaining track(s) more utilized for passenger movements; although the dynamic nature of trains
sharing a corridor mean that all tracks are available to all traffic when required. Train meets will typically
be scheduled at locations with two passenger tracks; however, co-production (operating both
passenger and freight trains on the same set of tracks) will also be used to enable train meets in
constrained portions of the network.

For what it's worth, Metrolinx believes the 3-4 tracks in the corridor west of Bramalea can meet frequency requirements. That includes 15 minute peak direction and 30 minute 2WAD service to Mount Pleasant GO.
Reply
(04-26-2022, 04:59 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(04-26-2022, 01:03 PM)Bytor Wrote: It won't accomplish the stated goals.

Even if you grade separate Silver Junction west of Georgetown, that whole CN-owned bit (the Halton Sub) from there to Bramalea where Metrolinx ownership resumes has too few tracks to accommodate both freight and passenger traffic. Most of it is only 2 tracks, except for about 4km between Brampton and Bramalea GO stations. There's simply not enough to share to make #2WADGO possible.

How many freights do they run? We’re only talking about one passenger train per hour in each direction. One track should be able to handle a train every 30 minutes — one freight and one passenger per hour. If not, we’re doing something wrong and need to do a field trip to Europe to see how it’s done. We seem to need way more tracks here than they do. I believe the issue at the junction has to do with crossing movements, not with the inherent capacity of two tracks in the absence of conflicts between tracks.

Part of the problem is speed. Passenger trains run a lot faster than 2km long freight trains.

Another part of it is rail traffic control and how that affects capacity. Rail lines are divided into blocks and a one train cannot enter a block until the train ahead of it has cleared the block. Block sizes vary based on how long the trains are and how fast they are moving and are made so that a train can throw on the brakes and stop before leaving their block and not crash into the one in the next block. Trains are scheduled into time slots to use a block based on when that block becomes clear.

Freight trains that are not only longer than passenger trains with but also take more to slow down means that block sizes are larger and travel more slowly than passenger trains which means that a train takes longer to clear it, and all that adds up to mean fewer time slots.

If it were only passenger trains it would be doable because the blocks would shorter and the trains would clear them more quickly and you thus have more time slots, but when you're talking about really long freight trains that need huge blocks and move through them so slow, the next timeslot through a block might be 2 hours later instead of 10 minutes later with only passenger trains.

In TL;DR speak, that's a capacity issue.

Now a grade separations might help trains move through some blocks faster, but if you look at the aerial view of Georgetown GO to Silver, you'll see that it's dedicated track from the station to the Guelph Sub to get to Kitchener. Google maps regular view gets the tracks wrong, BTW, and doesn't show that dedicated track from the Georgetown GO station. There's not really that much contention there so capacity improvements from a Silver grade separation would be limited. To quote somebody with far more rail knowledge than I "Grade separating anything at Silver either means you rebuild the entirety of Georgetown GO or you construct the biggest white elephant in GO's history."

This stretch of CN track from Bramalea to Georgetown is one of their busiest sections and all their traffic from Québec and the Maritimes must go through it to get to the USA, and vice versa. All of that freight traffic (which is growing, BTW) has to squeeze down to two tracks past Mount Pleasant GO is difficult at best, which is why GO hourly frequency has stopped there on the line. They don't have the time slots to make hourly passenger trains possible to Kitchener without addressing the capacity issues cause by not enough tracks.

So, yes, it is the "inherent capacity" of those two tracks which is the biggest limiting factor preventing 2WADGO to Kitchener.
Reply
(04-27-2022, 07:41 AM)jamincan Wrote:
Quote:The CN Halton Subdivision is a main artery for freight traffic and is important for both CN operations
and the overall Ontario economy. Project development work conducted by Metrolinx determined that
additional track capacity will be required to deliver the proposed service increases. The corridor would
consist of three and four track segments, with two tracks primarily used for freight traffic and the
remaining track(s) more utilized for passenger movements; although the dynamic nature of trains
sharing a corridor mean that all tracks are available to all traffic when required. Train meets will typically
be scheduled at locations with two passenger tracks; however, co-production (operating both
passenger and freight trains on the same set of tracks) will also be used to enable train meets in
constrained portions of the network.

For what it's worth, Metrolinx believes the 3-4 tracks in the corridor west of Bramalea can meet frequency requirements. That includes 15 minute peak direction and 30 minute 2WAD service to Mount Pleasant GO.

The three tracks only go to Mount Pleasant, which is why hourly service has stopped there and gone no further. And even then there are big gaps and it's never been hourly all day long.
Reply


Part of the improvements planned on the line according to the Business Plan are 3rd and 4th tracks on the Halton Subdivision. Two of the tracks would be mostly dedicated to freight movements and the passenger movements would be able to be scheduled on the remaining tracks for the most part. The grade separation isn't required for 2wad to Kitchener, it is required to give the operational flexibility to deal with delays etc. and would therefore allow higher speed service on the line.
Reply
First phase of work to expand Kitchener GO Line service kicks off:

https://blog.metrolinx.com/2022/05/03/fi...kicks-off/
Reply
Quote:passing track in Breslau Township
Reply
That's interesting. For context...a GO train will traverse the 3.6 km in just over 2 minutes at 100km/h (a moderate top speed for GO trains--they can go much faster but usually don't).

How often are Kitchener line trains arriving within 2 minutes of their scheduled arrival time? If they arrive outside this scheduled arrival time they will delay the outgoing train.

Passing tracks can work, but they are very fragile to any scheduling issues like one might have when sharing with freight.
Reply
Currently GO schedules 20 minutes between Kitchener and Guelph, which I think means this specific passing track should only really be needed for the 30 minute service in peak directions with the 2-way service pattern. I wonder if they would delay departure in Kitchener to synchronize with the departure in Guelph in order to make it more likely that they meet on time at the passing track.
Reply
(05-04-2022, 07:38 AM)jamincan Wrote: Currently GO schedules 20 minutes between Kitchener and Guelph, which I think means this specific passing track should only really be needed for the 30 minute service in peak directions with the 2-way service pattern. I wonder if they would delay departure in Kitchener to synchronize with the departure in Guelph in order to make it more likely that they meet on time at the passing track.

I mean, delaying in Kitchener vs. delaying in Breslau makes little difference at this point.

If the train is going to need to wait it's going to be delayed getting to all the other destinations. The schedule will either need a lot of slack (leading to longer trip times) or it is going to be unreliable in it's arrival time.
Reply


(05-04-2022, 08:37 AM)danbrotherston Wrote:
(05-04-2022, 07:38 AM)jamincan Wrote: Currently GO schedules 20 minutes between Kitchener and Guelph, which I think means this specific passing track should only really be needed for the 30 minute service in peak directions with the 2-way service pattern. I wonder if they would delay departure in Kitchener to synchronize with the departure in Guelph in order to make it more likely that they meet on time at the passing track.

I mean, delaying in Kitchener vs. delaying in Breslau makes little difference at this point.

If the train is going to need to wait it's going to be delayed getting to all the other destinations. The schedule will either need a lot of slack (leading to longer trip times) or it is going to be unreliable in it's arrival time.

It makes a difference with travel time - stopping in Breslau adds a second required acceleration that delaying in Kitchener wouldn't have.
Reply
Genuinely, what would Metrolinx need to do to convince people that they are actually proceeding with their plans for 2WAD service on the line? I hear criticism that they don't have a plan for 2WAD service, and when I point out that they do have a plan, the argument becomes that they have no plan to implement it, and when I point out that they've already started work that is identified as required in the plan, the argument becomes that the plan won't actually do what the plan sets out to do. Fair enough if that is true, but I haven't seen an actual criticism of the plan - ie. looking at scheduling patterns etc. If there is information along those lines, I'd love to see it.

It's not that I don't think some amount of cynicism is warranted, governments certainly pull the rug out from projects all the time, but in the cynical takes I keep seeing seem clearly counterfactual - ie. at this point in time Metrolinx is proceeding with implementing plans for 2WAD service to Kitchener. People may be skeptical about the plan, they may cynically about government commitment to the plan, but at this point in time, Metrolinx does have a plan, and they are proceeding with implementing it.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links