<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Waterloo Region Connected - Urban Design]]></title>
		<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Waterloo Region Connected - https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Kitchener 2051 (Official Plan Update)]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1970</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 19:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1689">ZEBuilder</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1970</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[For the last year the city has been working on developing the new official plan for Kitchener. This plan will incorporate ROPA 6 (Regional Official Plan Amendment 6) into it as well as a general update to the official plan from 2014.<br />
<br />
There's been a few technical studies completed so far for the project they can all be found on the Engage Kitchener page <a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/kitchener2051" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">here</a>.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/1417/5201/1427/DSD_PLAN_OPR_HEMSON_-_Kitchener_Non-Residential_Technical_Background_Study_Report_1_-23Apr25_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Report 1:</a> Commercial, Office and Future of Work and Mixed-Use Study<br />
<a href="https://hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/3017/5201/2065/DSD_PLAN_OPR_HEMSON_-_Kitchener_Non-Residential_Study_Report_2_-_30May25_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Report 2:</a> Industrial and Employment Lands Study<br />
<a href="https://hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/1117/5201/1738/DSD_PLAN_OPR_Kitchener2051_Non-res_Study_3_April28_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Report 3:</a> Institutional &amp; Community Infrastructure<br />
<a href="https://hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/6917/5201/1672/DSD_PLAN_OPR_Kitchener_Population_Forecast__HNA_Consolidated_Draft_Report_May_21_2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Report 4:</a> Population &amp; Employment Forecast Update &amp; Housing Needs Assessment<br />
<br />
Through the process the city has come up with various concepts for intensification. The city was initially focusing on 3 different concepts.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Concept 1: Nodes and Corridors</span><br />
This concept was effectively built upon the previous 2014 Official Plans Nodes and Corridors idea, it would allow for greater intensification along Regional Roads and at pretty much every major intersection. The major focus of intensification in this case is the MTSAs as well as the section of Weber between Highway 7 and Fairway.<br />
<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9040" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_1-9-2025_153329_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 490.96 KB / Downloads: 599)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Concept 2: New Urban Centres</span><br />
This concept is building off of the idea of nodes but bringing it to a larger scale developing what one could call mini downtowns in various locations of the city. The locations of these new urban centres would be Fischer Hallman/Highland, Strasburg/Block Line, and Ottawa/River. There would still be a focus on the MTSAs and the stretch of Weber but more densification would be forced into these new urban centres.<br />
<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9041" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_1-9-2025_153413_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 488.59 KB / Downloads: 623)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Concept 3: Evolving Neighbourhoods</span><br />
This last concept is entirely different from the other two in that it is expecting densification everywhere, albeit the scale of each project is less but it would be less concentrated than what is expected in the other two concepts. Think of intersections like River and Lorraine with 6 floor buildings.<br />
<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9042" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_1-9-2025_15358_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 494.7 KB / Downloads: 874)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
Through the public consultation process the City developed an interactive game for public feedback that allowed one to answer various questions. There was also various in person events that one could take part in. From these events and the online game they found an even split between the 3 concepts. From this the city developed the perferred growth option which has been endorsed by council at the Planning and Strategic Initiatives meeting.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Preferred Option</span><br />
This option primarily combines option 1 and 2 of the original concepts developed for community consultation. While incorporating some of concept 3. The preferred option incorporates intensification along Fischer Hallman (Potential BRT esque lanes are being studied), Highland, Ottawa (ROPA 6 intensification corridor), Weber and Homer Watson. Then it also incorporates intensification at the Highland/Fischer Hallman, Strasburg/Block Line, Ottawa/River, and an area within the Dundee Secondary Plan. Lastly there will be some expansion of the SGA areas beyond the PMTSAs along Victoria, Frederick and Belmont.<br />
<br />
These intensification areas will get SGA designations. These will likely follow the existing SGA designations introduced through Growing Together but may introduce new designations. The existing SGA designations are SGA-A, SGA-B, and SGA-C. SGA-A allows for low-mid rise, SGA-B allows for mid rise and SGA-C allows for high rise.<br />
<br />
The rest of the city will get new designations based on how the city is split in the consultant report with the remaining areas being Employment Growth Areas and Neighbourhood Growth Areas. These areas will allow for much of the ROPA-6 15 minute cities objectives to be implemented through the rest of the city.<br />
<br />
Staff Report: <a href="https://pub-kitchener.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=28736" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://pub-kitchener.escribemeetings.co...ntId=28736</a><br />
Consultant Report: <a href="https://pub-kitchener.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=28737" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Growth Scenarios Study Report</a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Preferred Option Map:</span><br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9039" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_1-9-2025_15328_pub-kitchener.escribemeetings.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 401.28 KB / Downloads: 648)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
The draft Official Plan is still being worked on and will come back for public consultation later in the fall after that it will go to council for approval once any tweaks are made that come up from that draft. After the new Official Plan is approved it will then trigger a revision of the zoning within Kitchener to allow for the plan to be properly implemented which will see the SGA zones extended to those new SGA areas and the development of any new zones that may be required.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[For the last year the city has been working on developing the new official plan for Kitchener. This plan will incorporate ROPA 6 (Regional Official Plan Amendment 6) into it as well as a general update to the official plan from 2014.<br />
<br />
There's been a few technical studies completed so far for the project they can all be found on the Engage Kitchener page <a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/kitchener2051" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">here</a>.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/1417/5201/1427/DSD_PLAN_OPR_HEMSON_-_Kitchener_Non-Residential_Technical_Background_Study_Report_1_-23Apr25_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Report 1:</a> Commercial, Office and Future of Work and Mixed-Use Study<br />
<a href="https://hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/3017/5201/2065/DSD_PLAN_OPR_HEMSON_-_Kitchener_Non-Residential_Study_Report_2_-_30May25_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Report 2:</a> Industrial and Employment Lands Study<br />
<a href="https://hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/1117/5201/1738/DSD_PLAN_OPR_Kitchener2051_Non-res_Study_3_April28_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Report 3:</a> Institutional &amp; Community Infrastructure<br />
<a href="https://hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/6917/5201/1672/DSD_PLAN_OPR_Kitchener_Population_Forecast__HNA_Consolidated_Draft_Report_May_21_2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Report 4:</a> Population &amp; Employment Forecast Update &amp; Housing Needs Assessment<br />
<br />
Through the process the city has come up with various concepts for intensification. The city was initially focusing on 3 different concepts.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Concept 1: Nodes and Corridors</span><br />
This concept was effectively built upon the previous 2014 Official Plans Nodes and Corridors idea, it would allow for greater intensification along Regional Roads and at pretty much every major intersection. The major focus of intensification in this case is the MTSAs as well as the section of Weber between Highway 7 and Fairway.<br />
<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9040" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_1-9-2025_153329_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 490.96 KB / Downloads: 599)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Concept 2: New Urban Centres</span><br />
This concept is building off of the idea of nodes but bringing it to a larger scale developing what one could call mini downtowns in various locations of the city. The locations of these new urban centres would be Fischer Hallman/Highland, Strasburg/Block Line, and Ottawa/River. There would still be a focus on the MTSAs and the stretch of Weber but more densification would be forced into these new urban centres.<br />
<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9041" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_1-9-2025_153413_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 488.59 KB / Downloads: 623)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Concept 3: Evolving Neighbourhoods</span><br />
This last concept is entirely different from the other two in that it is expecting densification everywhere, albeit the scale of each project is less but it would be less concentrated than what is expected in the other two concepts. Think of intersections like River and Lorraine with 6 floor buildings.<br />
<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9042" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_1-9-2025_15358_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 494.7 KB / Downloads: 874)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
Through the public consultation process the City developed an interactive game for public feedback that allowed one to answer various questions. There was also various in person events that one could take part in. From these events and the online game they found an even split between the 3 concepts. From this the city developed the perferred growth option which has been endorsed by council at the Planning and Strategic Initiatives meeting.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Preferred Option</span><br />
This option primarily combines option 1 and 2 of the original concepts developed for community consultation. While incorporating some of concept 3. The preferred option incorporates intensification along Fischer Hallman (Potential BRT esque lanes are being studied), Highland, Ottawa (ROPA 6 intensification corridor), Weber and Homer Watson. Then it also incorporates intensification at the Highland/Fischer Hallman, Strasburg/Block Line, Ottawa/River, and an area within the Dundee Secondary Plan. Lastly there will be some expansion of the SGA areas beyond the PMTSAs along Victoria, Frederick and Belmont.<br />
<br />
These intensification areas will get SGA designations. These will likely follow the existing SGA designations introduced through Growing Together but may introduce new designations. The existing SGA designations are SGA-A, SGA-B, and SGA-C. SGA-A allows for low-mid rise, SGA-B allows for mid rise and SGA-C allows for high rise.<br />
<br />
The rest of the city will get new designations based on how the city is split in the consultant report with the remaining areas being Employment Growth Areas and Neighbourhood Growth Areas. These areas will allow for much of the ROPA-6 15 minute cities objectives to be implemented through the rest of the city.<br />
<br />
Staff Report: <a href="https://pub-kitchener.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=28736" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://pub-kitchener.escribemeetings.co...ntId=28736</a><br />
Consultant Report: <a href="https://pub-kitchener.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=28737" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Growth Scenarios Study Report</a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Preferred Option Map:</span><br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9039" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_1-9-2025_15328_pub-kitchener.escribemeetings.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 401.28 KB / Downloads: 648)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
The draft Official Plan is still being worked on and will come back for public consultation later in the fall after that it will go to council for approval once any tweaks are made that come up from that draft. After the new Official Plan is approved it will then trigger a revision of the zoning within Kitchener to allow for the plan to be properly implemented which will see the SGA zones extended to those new SGA areas and the development of any new zones that may be required.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dundee Secondary Plan (City of Kitchener)]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1951</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 01:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1689">ZEBuilder</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1951</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[This is the last Secondary Plan for the City of Kitchener that covers greenfield areas (provided the province doesn't meddle again). In this case the plan covers the area bound by Fischer Hallman to the west, New Dundee Rd to the south, Reidel Dr to the east and the Wallaceton subdivision to the north.<br />
<br />
The lands that this Secondary Plan will cover is owned almost entirely by Activa (737.5 acres), lands in the secondary plan are also owned by Branthaven and Schlegel in the realm of 150 acres each. There's a section of land that I don't know who owns but it's likely Activa. With it being Activa there will be low density like any subdivision but they've been recently pushing for higher densities which is certainly reflected in the concepts.<br />
<br />
As of right now the City is only at the PIC 2 stage of the project so things are still subject to change but they are targeting a density of 84 ppj/ha which is a higher target density than the Block Line MTSA (80 ppj/ha). The intent of the secondary plan is to guide subdivision plans but for the most part there are already concepts which have been floated between the developers and the Region/City so it's generally known that there will be SWM ponds along New Dundee Rd and Fischer-Hallman with a few scattered throughout the rest of the subdivision.<br />
<br />
The city will continue in a similar vein to previous secondary plans like Rosenberg to promote the development of an urban corridor along the arterial roads in the area (Strasburg Rd Extension, Blair Creek Dr Extension), these corridors are intended to have mixed-use, med-high density. Given the intended locations of the corridors future development will likely be similar in scale to 1198 and 1340 Fischer Hallman.<br />
<br />
What will be different in this case is the intent for a secondary Urban Core area. This is going to be a major feature of Kitchener 2051 when the draft comes out later this year. Within these Urban Core areas the city is effectively intending for mixed use development intended for 15 minute cities. Likewise there are going to be various Nodes throughout the area which have similar intents just smaller scales.<br />
<br />
Right now there is the option for public comment on the draft land use plans which I will include below. Here's the Engage link: <a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/dundeesecondaryplan" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Dundee Secondary Plan: Subwatershed, Transportation and Land Use Study | EngageWR</a><br />
<br />
Draft Plan Legend<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9003" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_30-5-2025_205019_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 47.37 KB / Downloads: 367)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
Draft Plan A<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9001" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_30-5-2025_204936_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 336.29 KB / Downloads: 354)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
Draft Plan B<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9002" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_30-5-2025_204949_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 331.84 KB / Downloads: 340)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
Concept for Nodes (This is a model from Kitchener 2051 showing Ottawa/Lackner):<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9005" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_30-5-2025_205124_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 544.66 KB / Downloads: 347)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
Concept for Urban Core area (This is a model from Kitchener 2051 showing Ottawa/River):<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9004" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_30-5-2025_205057_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 637.31 KB / Downloads: 348)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is the last Secondary Plan for the City of Kitchener that covers greenfield areas (provided the province doesn't meddle again). In this case the plan covers the area bound by Fischer Hallman to the west, New Dundee Rd to the south, Reidel Dr to the east and the Wallaceton subdivision to the north.<br />
<br />
The lands that this Secondary Plan will cover is owned almost entirely by Activa (737.5 acres), lands in the secondary plan are also owned by Branthaven and Schlegel in the realm of 150 acres each. There's a section of land that I don't know who owns but it's likely Activa. With it being Activa there will be low density like any subdivision but they've been recently pushing for higher densities which is certainly reflected in the concepts.<br />
<br />
As of right now the City is only at the PIC 2 stage of the project so things are still subject to change but they are targeting a density of 84 ppj/ha which is a higher target density than the Block Line MTSA (80 ppj/ha). The intent of the secondary plan is to guide subdivision plans but for the most part there are already concepts which have been floated between the developers and the Region/City so it's generally known that there will be SWM ponds along New Dundee Rd and Fischer-Hallman with a few scattered throughout the rest of the subdivision.<br />
<br />
The city will continue in a similar vein to previous secondary plans like Rosenberg to promote the development of an urban corridor along the arterial roads in the area (Strasburg Rd Extension, Blair Creek Dr Extension), these corridors are intended to have mixed-use, med-high density. Given the intended locations of the corridors future development will likely be similar in scale to 1198 and 1340 Fischer Hallman.<br />
<br />
What will be different in this case is the intent for a secondary Urban Core area. This is going to be a major feature of Kitchener 2051 when the draft comes out later this year. Within these Urban Core areas the city is effectively intending for mixed use development intended for 15 minute cities. Likewise there are going to be various Nodes throughout the area which have similar intents just smaller scales.<br />
<br />
Right now there is the option for public comment on the draft land use plans which I will include below. Here's the Engage link: <a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/dundeesecondaryplan" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Dundee Secondary Plan: Subwatershed, Transportation and Land Use Study | EngageWR</a><br />
<br />
Draft Plan Legend<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9003" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_30-5-2025_205019_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 47.37 KB / Downloads: 367)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
Draft Plan A<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9001" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_30-5-2025_204936_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 336.29 KB / Downloads: 354)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
Draft Plan B<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9002" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_30-5-2025_204949_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 331.84 KB / Downloads: 340)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
Concept for Nodes (This is a model from Kitchener 2051 showing Ottawa/Lackner):<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9005" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_30-5-2025_205124_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 544.66 KB / Downloads: 347)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
Concept for Urban Core area (This is a model from Kitchener 2051 showing Ottawa/River):<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPEG Image" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=9004" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot_30-5-2025_205057_hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com.jpeg</a> (Size: 637.31 KB / Downloads: 348)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Form-Based Residential Zoning]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1938</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 01:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1979">bravado</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1938</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[It looks like one of the conditions of Cambridge taking the federal money for housing was to simplify existing residential zoning. Based on the EngageWR posting, the city has 16 (!!!) different residential zones and is proposing to go to 4 (see below).<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/new-comprehensive-zoning-by-law-with-form-based-residential-zoning" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">EngageWR Post</a><br />
<br />
<a href="https://hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/7917/3674/7890/7f37d8a6c4d6b892c45018dc91d685a8_24-127-CD_HAF_Initiative_No._4_Form_Based_Zoning.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">PDF Presentation</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>The City's current Zoning By-law came into effect in 1987 and is very restrictive and a barrier to housing. The current By-law places properties into discrete zones based on dwelling type and density. Currently, there are 16 unique residential zones, each with individual standards such as permitted dwelling type, maximum density, frontage, lot area, and setbacks.<br />
<br />
City staff are working towards completing a new comprehensive Zoning By-law that will reflect current planning practices and community standards.<br />
<br />
Part of this new approach is supporting what is referred to as "missing middle housing".<br />
<br />
Form based zoning is intended to be incorporated into the new comprehensive zoning by-law in residential areas. Staff are considering the following 4 new zones which would apply City-wide:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">RR - Detached, private services</span><br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">R1 - Detached, attached and multiple (3 storey maximum)</span><br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">R2 - Detached, attached and multiple (4 storey maximum)</span><br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">R3 - Attached and multiples (5-15 storey maximum, subject to tall building standards)</span></blockquote>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-size: 1pt;" class="mycode_size"><span style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova Regular', 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font"><img src="https://i.imgur.com/Yf3ZqP2.png" loading="lazy"  alt="[Image: Yf3ZqP2.png]" class="mycode_img" /></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-size: 1pt;" class="mycode_size"><span style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova Regular', 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font">I</span></span></span><br />
I'm definitely planning on going to the public meeting about this, but as always with local government in Ontario, I am desperately looking for the catch. Cambridge did not implement the fourplex bylaws that other cities did and yet it looks like this is basically it in some ways. <br />
<br />
Do the engineering and urban planning experts have any thoughts? Sometimes this stuff thoroughly goes over my head.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[It looks like one of the conditions of Cambridge taking the federal money for housing was to simplify existing residential zoning. Based on the EngageWR posting, the city has 16 (!!!) different residential zones and is proposing to go to 4 (see below).<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/new-comprehensive-zoning-by-law-with-form-based-residential-zoning" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">EngageWR Post</a><br />
<br />
<a href="https://hdp-ca-prod-app-wr-engage-files.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/7917/3674/7890/7f37d8a6c4d6b892c45018dc91d685a8_24-127-CD_HAF_Initiative_No._4_Form_Based_Zoning.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">PDF Presentation</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>The City's current Zoning By-law came into effect in 1987 and is very restrictive and a barrier to housing. The current By-law places properties into discrete zones based on dwelling type and density. Currently, there are 16 unique residential zones, each with individual standards such as permitted dwelling type, maximum density, frontage, lot area, and setbacks.<br />
<br />
City staff are working towards completing a new comprehensive Zoning By-law that will reflect current planning practices and community standards.<br />
<br />
Part of this new approach is supporting what is referred to as "missing middle housing".<br />
<br />
Form based zoning is intended to be incorporated into the new comprehensive zoning by-law in residential areas. Staff are considering the following 4 new zones which would apply City-wide:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">RR - Detached, private services</span><br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">R1 - Detached, attached and multiple (3 storey maximum)</span><br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">R2 - Detached, attached and multiple (4 storey maximum)</span><br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">R3 - Attached and multiples (5-15 storey maximum, subject to tall building standards)</span></blockquote>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-size: 1pt;" class="mycode_size"><span style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova Regular', 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font"><img src="https://i.imgur.com/Yf3ZqP2.png" loading="lazy"  alt="[Image: Yf3ZqP2.png]" class="mycode_img" /></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-size: 1pt;" class="mycode_size"><span style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova Regular', 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font">I</span></span></span><br />
I'm definitely planning on going to the public meeting about this, but as always with local government in Ontario, I am desperately looking for the catch. Cambridge did not implement the fourplex bylaws that other cities did and yet it looks like this is basically it in some ways. <br />
<br />
Do the engineering and urban planning experts have any thoughts? Sometimes this stuff thoroughly goes over my head.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[More interesting precast panels]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1886</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 02:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1461">cherrypark</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1886</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Literally begging anyone to build something with colour and some visual fortitude that isn't attempting to Minecraft razzledazzle the parking podium out of existence. it's so tired.<br />
<br />
Rest assured that precast clearance sale of a building on King just north of Uptown will probably never be unseated as the worst offender.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Literally begging anyone to build something with colour and some visual fortitude that isn't attempting to Minecraft razzledazzle the parking podium out of existence. it's so tired.<br />
<br />
Rest assured that precast clearance sale of a building on King just north of Uptown will probably never be unseated as the worst offender.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Architectural Eyecandy - Photos, drawings, models of buildings and urban spaces]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1883</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 22:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=383">ac3r</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1883</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I thought I'd start a thread where we can share photos and other media of nice buildings and urban spaces from around the world. The purpose is to just show off what you personally like - and what you'd like to see in Waterloo Region! There is a severe lack of good design here despite having a prestigeous architecture school located in our region (and many well designed buildings to boot), but with developers' addiction to prefab EIFS we're seeing more bad than good.<br />
<br />
Feel free to share photographs of buildings and models, as well as CAD drawings, renderings or even video of anything you fancy. Feel free to embed images and information, or just provide a link to a convenient source.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I thought I'd start a thread where we can share photos and other media of nice buildings and urban spaces from around the world. The purpose is to just show off what you personally like - and what you'd like to see in Waterloo Region! There is a severe lack of good design here despite having a prestigeous architecture school located in our region (and many well designed buildings to boot), but with developers' addiction to prefab EIFS we're seeing more bad than good.<br />
<br />
Feel free to share photographs of buildings and models, as well as CAD drawings, renderings or even video of anything you fancy. Feel free to embed images and information, or just provide a link to a convenient source.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bingeman Park former Campground area]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1835</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 17:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=2282">LuxoCamper</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1835</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/smilies/huh.gif" alt="Huh" title="Huh" class="smilie smilie_17" /> <br />
Does anyone know what is being built on the [now completely flattened] former campground area at Bingeman Park? My only humble speculation is another (or more) of those MONSTROUS monolithic 'warehouse' buildings currently under construction a bit further west along Bingeman Parkway.  If that's it, I'm wondering why we need so much warehouse space in this area, now that basically nothing is manufactured here anymore...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/smilies/huh.gif" alt="Huh" title="Huh" class="smilie smilie_17" /> <br />
Does anyone know what is being built on the [now completely flattened] former campground area at Bingeman Park? My only humble speculation is another (or more) of those MONSTROUS monolithic 'warehouse' buildings currently under construction a bit further west along Bingeman Parkway.  If that's it, I'm wondering why we need so much warehouse space in this area, now that basically nothing is manufactured here anymore...]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Growing Together (City of Kitchener)]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1812</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2023 01:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1689">ZEBuilder</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1812</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[The city of Kitchener has been working on updating the existing zoning in the MTSAs around the downtown core. This new project is called "Growing Together" it is based off of the work the city has already done through PARTs (Planning Around Rapid Transit) as well as the NPR (Neighborhood Planning Review) that followed. The new Growing Together is based on a combination of PARTs, NPR, ROPA6 (Regional Official Plan Amendment 6) as well as new direction from the province which includes a target of 35000 new units by the end of 2031 as well as other changes to the Planning Act.<br />
 <br />
In March and April the city conducted community workshops in order to get citizen input on the project, these included events at the Market as well as at community centers. Citizens could put different plastic models of buildings down on a map to indicate the type of density they would like for specific areas as well as different heights. The following presentation was shown at these workshops. <a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/35796/widgets/147255/documents/100660" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Presentation</a> <br />
<br />
The city compiled the locations and densities and did basic analysis on all of the individual workshops and all of them collectively, this included a event that was solely made up of city councilors. What was found is that most people are wanting growth to occur in the UGC (urban growth center) which is made up of Central, Victoria Park, City Hall, Queen, and Frederick Stations. Stations outside of the UGC such as Grand River Hospital, Kitchener Market, Borden and Mill all were not hitting the desired densities that are outline by the province and region for MTSAs. This desired density is 160 residents and jobs per hectare. The document can be found here. <a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/35796/widgets/147255/documents/107600" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Results</a><br />
<br />
This document contains all of the computer models that were developed from the workshops, the computer models also include existing proposals to the city, notably 50 Borden Ave as well as 417 King St W are missing as these were yet to be formally submitted. <a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/35796/widgets/147255/documents/106198" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Models</a><br />
<br />
Staff have now used this data to make a draft update to the current zoning throughout the MTSA core. This draft plan abolishes all existing residential/commercial/industrial zoning (including the restrictive zoning for single family homes) and proposes 4 new levels of zoning. What is common throughout all of these zones is no vehicular parking minimums, no maximum FSR, it will limit built form through set backs, step backs, as well as building length and height.<br />
<br />
The first level is SGA-1 (Strategic Growth Area-1) which is where low rise and typical missing middle would be found, this is limited to low rise height, based upon the pictures in the document roughly 4 floors in height.<br />
The second level is SGA-2 which is mid rise, this is limited to mid rise height, based upon the document building such as Barra on Queen, Market Flats and 387 King would fall in this zone.<br />
The third is SGA-3 which would be high rise restricted, based upon the documents about 20 floors would be the cut off as building such as 1 Vic and The Bright Building are within this zone<br />
Finally there is the SGA-4 zone which would be normal high rise where there is no restrictions in the height of buildings, so buildings such as 50 Borden and 417 King St W would fall into it.<br />
<br />
These zones are fairly evenly dispersed within the MTSAs as 24% of land is SGA-1, 25% is SGA-2, 22% is SGA-3 and 29% is SGA-4. These seems to mean that there will be a lot less ZBA/OPA applications for height as well as less parking. The document can be found here. <a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/35796/widgets/147255/documents/108646" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Draft Approach</a><br />
<br />
This is the Draft Zoning Map for the MTSAs, it can also be found on page 22 of the draft plan.<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="PNG Image" border="0" alt=".png" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=8589" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot 2023-08-26 213151.png</a> (Size: 944.46 KB / Downloads: 998)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
The next step in the process is to go to council with the final approach where it will either be discussed/changed/approved. It does not say when this is expected to occur.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The city of Kitchener has been working on updating the existing zoning in the MTSAs around the downtown core. This new project is called "Growing Together" it is based off of the work the city has already done through PARTs (Planning Around Rapid Transit) as well as the NPR (Neighborhood Planning Review) that followed. The new Growing Together is based on a combination of PARTs, NPR, ROPA6 (Regional Official Plan Amendment 6) as well as new direction from the province which includes a target of 35000 new units by the end of 2031 as well as other changes to the Planning Act.<br />
 <br />
In March and April the city conducted community workshops in order to get citizen input on the project, these included events at the Market as well as at community centers. Citizens could put different plastic models of buildings down on a map to indicate the type of density they would like for specific areas as well as different heights. The following presentation was shown at these workshops. <a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/35796/widgets/147255/documents/100660" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Presentation</a> <br />
<br />
The city compiled the locations and densities and did basic analysis on all of the individual workshops and all of them collectively, this included a event that was solely made up of city councilors. What was found is that most people are wanting growth to occur in the UGC (urban growth center) which is made up of Central, Victoria Park, City Hall, Queen, and Frederick Stations. Stations outside of the UGC such as Grand River Hospital, Kitchener Market, Borden and Mill all were not hitting the desired densities that are outline by the province and region for MTSAs. This desired density is 160 residents and jobs per hectare. The document can be found here. <a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/35796/widgets/147255/documents/107600" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Results</a><br />
<br />
This document contains all of the computer models that were developed from the workshops, the computer models also include existing proposals to the city, notably 50 Borden Ave as well as 417 King St W are missing as these were yet to be formally submitted. <a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/35796/widgets/147255/documents/106198" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Models</a><br />
<br />
Staff have now used this data to make a draft update to the current zoning throughout the MTSA core. This draft plan abolishes all existing residential/commercial/industrial zoning (including the restrictive zoning for single family homes) and proposes 4 new levels of zoning. What is common throughout all of these zones is no vehicular parking minimums, no maximum FSR, it will limit built form through set backs, step backs, as well as building length and height.<br />
<br />
The first level is SGA-1 (Strategic Growth Area-1) which is where low rise and typical missing middle would be found, this is limited to low rise height, based upon the pictures in the document roughly 4 floors in height.<br />
The second level is SGA-2 which is mid rise, this is limited to mid rise height, based upon the document building such as Barra on Queen, Market Flats and 387 King would fall in this zone.<br />
The third is SGA-3 which would be high rise restricted, based upon the documents about 20 floors would be the cut off as building such as 1 Vic and The Bright Building are within this zone<br />
Finally there is the SGA-4 zone which would be normal high rise where there is no restrictions in the height of buildings, so buildings such as 50 Borden and 417 King St W would fall into it.<br />
<br />
These zones are fairly evenly dispersed within the MTSAs as 24% of land is SGA-1, 25% is SGA-2, 22% is SGA-3 and 29% is SGA-4. These seems to mean that there will be a lot less ZBA/OPA applications for height as well as less parking. The document can be found here. <a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/35796/widgets/147255/documents/108646" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Draft Approach</a><br />
<br />
This is the Draft Zoning Map for the MTSAs, it can also be found on page 22 of the draft plan.<br />
<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="PNG Image" border="0" alt=".png" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=8589" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot 2023-08-26 213151.png</a> (Size: 944.46 KB / Downloads: 998)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><br />
<br />
The next step in the process is to go to council with the final approach where it will either be discussed/changed/approved. It does not say when this is expected to occur.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Inclusionary Zoning]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1747</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 16:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1346">dtkmelissa</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1747</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Given the region and local municipalities are considering adopting inclusionary zoning, I'm curious if a thread already exists on that topic? If not, I'd love to start one. <br />
<br />
Some background info can be found here: <a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/inclusionary-zoning" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.engagewr.ca/inclusionary-zoning</a><br />
<br />
From that page: The cities of Kitchener, Waterloo and Cambridge and the Region of Waterloo are looking at new approaches to deliver affordable units in projects that are built by private developers. One tool that can support affordable units within new housing stock is called inclusionary zoning.<br />
<br />
To be successful, an inclusionary zoning program needs to strike a balance between the various policy parameters, such as how many affordable units are required and how affordable the units are.<br />
<br />
The cities are also exploring ways to ensure that any inclusionary zoning program is financially sustainable and can operate without significant municipal subsidy, though there may be instances where incentives may be needed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Given the region and local municipalities are considering adopting inclusionary zoning, I'm curious if a thread already exists on that topic? If not, I'd love to start one. <br />
<br />
Some background info can be found here: <a href="https://www.engagewr.ca/inclusionary-zoning" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.engagewr.ca/inclusionary-zoning</a><br />
<br />
From that page: The cities of Kitchener, Waterloo and Cambridge and the Region of Waterloo are looking at new approaches to deliver affordable units in projects that are built by private developers. One tool that can support affordable units within new housing stock is called inclusionary zoning.<br />
<br />
To be successful, an inclusionary zoning program needs to strike a balance between the various policy parameters, such as how many affordable units are required and how affordable the units are.<br />
<br />
The cities are also exploring ways to ensure that any inclusionary zoning program is financially sustainable and can operate without significant municipal subsidy, though there may be instances where incentives may be needed.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Growth in Waterloo Region | The Regional Official Plan Review | Planning to 2051]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1704</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 15:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=383">ac3r</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1704</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[With 923'000 people expected to be living in Waterloo Region by 2051, the Region of Waterloo is putting together its newest Official Growth Plan and seeking public input.<br />
<br />
Most notably is the creation of the "15 minute neighbourhood", which as the phrase suggests would be neighbourhoods where many daily and non-daily living necessities are located within a 15 minute walk from home.<br />
<br />
More info is available at their website: <a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/9259ed5880e94f3e9ef9f879249dc4e2" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/925...79249dc4e2</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[With 923'000 people expected to be living in Waterloo Region by 2051, the Region of Waterloo is putting together its newest Official Growth Plan and seeking public input.<br />
<br />
Most notably is the creation of the "15 minute neighbourhood", which as the phrase suggests would be neighbourhoods where many daily and non-daily living necessities are located within a 15 minute walk from home.<br />
<br />
More info is available at their website: <a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/9259ed5880e94f3e9ef9f879249dc4e2" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/925...79249dc4e2</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[General media thread for architecture, urban planning and design]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1703</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 15:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=383">ac3r</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1703</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I thought I'd start a thread for media suggestions that relate to architecture, urban planning and design.<br />
<br />
First up, I want to suggest the book Soft City: Building Density for Everyday Life by David Sim: <a href="https://www.amazon.ca/Soft-City-Building-Density-Everyday/dp/1642830186/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?keywords=City%3A+Building+Density+for+Everyday+Life+by+David+Sim&amp;qid=1656688371&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.amazon.ca/Soft-City-Building...371&amp;sr=8-1</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>Imagine waking up to the gentle noises of the city, and moving through your day with complete confidence that you will get where you need to go quickly and efficiently. Soft City is about ease and comfort, where density has a human dimension, adapting to our ever-changing needs, nurturing relationships, and accommodating the pleasures of everyday life. How do we move from the current reality in most cites-separated uses and lengthy commutes in single-occupancy vehicles that drain human, environmental, and community resources-to support a soft city approach?<br />
 <br />
In Soft City David Sim, partner and creative director at Gehl, shows how this is possible, presenting ideas and graphic examples from around the globe. He draws from his vast design experience to make a case for a dense and diverse built environment at a human scale, which he presents through a series of observations of older and newer places, and a range of simple built phenomena, some traditional and some totally new inventions.<br />
 <br />
Sim shows that increasing density is not enough. The soft city must consider the organization and layout of the built environment for more fluid movement and comfort, a diversity of building types, and thoughtful design to ensure a sustainable urban environment and society.<br />
 <br />
Soft City begins with the big ideas of happiness and quality of life, and then shows how they are tied to the way we live. The heart of the book is highly visual and shows the building blocks for neighborhoods: building types and their organization and orientation; how we can get along as we get around a city; and living with the weather. As every citizen deals with the reality of a changing climate, Soft City explores how the built environment can adapt and respond.<br />
 <br />
Soft City offers inspiration, ideas, and guidance for anyone interested in city building. Sim shows how to make any city more efficient, more livable, and better connected to the environment.</blockquote>
<br />
This is a great book on designing human centric cities. Much of this easily pertains to the current transit oriented development strategy the Region of Waterloo is undertaking. It offers many useful strategies for how we can design our region in an ideal way. It's 43.99 for a paperback and 34.99 for the Kindle edition. I highly recommend it to everyone here to get a very indepth reading on designing cities in a human way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I thought I'd start a thread for media suggestions that relate to architecture, urban planning and design.<br />
<br />
First up, I want to suggest the book Soft City: Building Density for Everyday Life by David Sim: <a href="https://www.amazon.ca/Soft-City-Building-Density-Everyday/dp/1642830186/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?keywords=City%3A+Building+Density+for+Everyday+Life+by+David+Sim&amp;qid=1656688371&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.amazon.ca/Soft-City-Building...371&amp;sr=8-1</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>Imagine waking up to the gentle noises of the city, and moving through your day with complete confidence that you will get where you need to go quickly and efficiently. Soft City is about ease and comfort, where density has a human dimension, adapting to our ever-changing needs, nurturing relationships, and accommodating the pleasures of everyday life. How do we move from the current reality in most cites-separated uses and lengthy commutes in single-occupancy vehicles that drain human, environmental, and community resources-to support a soft city approach?<br />
 <br />
In Soft City David Sim, partner and creative director at Gehl, shows how this is possible, presenting ideas and graphic examples from around the globe. He draws from his vast design experience to make a case for a dense and diverse built environment at a human scale, which he presents through a series of observations of older and newer places, and a range of simple built phenomena, some traditional and some totally new inventions.<br />
 <br />
Sim shows that increasing density is not enough. The soft city must consider the organization and layout of the built environment for more fluid movement and comfort, a diversity of building types, and thoughtful design to ensure a sustainable urban environment and society.<br />
 <br />
Soft City begins with the big ideas of happiness and quality of life, and then shows how they are tied to the way we live. The heart of the book is highly visual and shows the building blocks for neighborhoods: building types and their organization and orientation; how we can get along as we get around a city; and living with the weather. As every citizen deals with the reality of a changing climate, Soft City explores how the built environment can adapt and respond.<br />
 <br />
Soft City offers inspiration, ideas, and guidance for anyone interested in city building. Sim shows how to make any city more efficient, more livable, and better connected to the environment.</blockquote>
<br />
This is a great book on designing human centric cities. Much of this easily pertains to the current transit oriented development strategy the Region of Waterloo is undertaking. It offers many useful strategies for how we can design our region in an ideal way. It's 43.99 for a paperback and 34.99 for the Kindle edition. I highly recommend it to everyone here to get a very indepth reading on designing cities in a human way.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[75 Years of Modern Architecture]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1697</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 22:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=383">ac3r</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1697</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Martin Simmons Sweers is selling an anniversary book titled 75 Years of Modern Architecture (&#36;34.95) which documents 75 years of modern architecture projects they've contributed to the region over the course of their time operating here. It has over 100 pages of photographs and information on their projects and influence in Waterloo Region. It can be purchased for delivery online with free shipping within the cities or at their architecture office at 113 Breithaupt Street (Suite 200), which is the black building at the end of the street. They're also selling a matching tote bag (&#36;7.95).<br />
<br />
Book: <a href="https://mssarchitects.square.site/product/75-years-of-modern-architecture/2?cp=true&amp;sa=false&amp;sbp=false&amp;q=false&amp;category_id=2" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://mssarchitects.square.site/produc...egory_id=2</a><br />
Tote Bag: <a href="https://mssarchitects.square.site/product/tote-bag/3?cp=true&amp;sa=false&amp;sbp=false&amp;q=false&amp;category_id=2" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://mssarchitects.square.site/produc...egory_id=2</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Martin Simmons Sweers is selling an anniversary book titled 75 Years of Modern Architecture (&#36;34.95) which documents 75 years of modern architecture projects they've contributed to the region over the course of their time operating here. It has over 100 pages of photographs and information on their projects and influence in Waterloo Region. It can be purchased for delivery online with free shipping within the cities or at their architecture office at 113 Breithaupt Street (Suite 200), which is the black building at the end of the street. They're also selling a matching tote bag (&#36;7.95).<br />
<br />
Book: <a href="https://mssarchitects.square.site/product/75-years-of-modern-architecture/2?cp=true&amp;sa=false&amp;sbp=false&amp;q=false&amp;category_id=2" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://mssarchitects.square.site/produc...egory_id=2</a><br />
Tote Bag: <a href="https://mssarchitects.square.site/product/tote-bag/3?cp=true&amp;sa=false&amp;sbp=false&amp;q=false&amp;category_id=2" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://mssarchitects.square.site/produc...egory_id=2</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[3D Model  - Future Waterloo Region Skylines]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1658</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 23:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1979">bravado</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1658</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[User ericmacm posted on r/Waterloo this series of 7x 3D image models of the “future skylines of KWC overlaid on google earth imagery. Very creative and a good visual.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://reddit.com/r/waterloo/comments/swcwth/my_sketchup_3d_model_of_the_future_skylines_of/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Reddit post</a><br />
<br />
This is their description of the project:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>Hey /r/waterloo!<br />
I hope you're all having a great long weekend. I figured it was time for me to post one of my projects - my 3D SketchUp model of the future skylines of Kitchener/Waterloo/Cambridge in Google Earth. More or less, this is what the region is going to look like skyline-wise in the coming decade.<br />
This version of the model contains 125 new towers across all three centres. This is obviously a drastic change from what currently exists in much of the area, but it is not surprising given the growth of the region in the past decade, along with new transit investments through iON and GO. I have a lot of optimism for the region to emerge as one of Canada's dominant centres in the future.<br />
I work on lot of other skylines across Canada and have many in the works. If you're interested in my work, feel free to give me a follow on Instagram @pancanadianskylines! </blockquote>
<a href="https://www.instagram.com/pancanadianskylines/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Instagram</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[User ericmacm posted on r/Waterloo this series of 7x 3D image models of the “future skylines of KWC overlaid on google earth imagery. Very creative and a good visual.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://reddit.com/r/waterloo/comments/swcwth/my_sketchup_3d_model_of_the_future_skylines_of/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Reddit post</a><br />
<br />
This is their description of the project:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>Hey /r/waterloo!<br />
I hope you're all having a great long weekend. I figured it was time for me to post one of my projects - my 3D SketchUp model of the future skylines of Kitchener/Waterloo/Cambridge in Google Earth. More or less, this is what the region is going to look like skyline-wise in the coming decade.<br />
This version of the model contains 125 new towers across all three centres. This is obviously a drastic change from what currently exists in much of the area, but it is not surprising given the growth of the region in the past decade, along with new transit investments through iON and GO. I have a lot of optimism for the region to emerge as one of Canada's dominant centres in the future.<br />
I work on lot of other skylines across Canada and have many in the works. If you're interested in my work, feel free to give me a follow on Instagram @pancanadianskylines! </blockquote>
<a href="https://www.instagram.com/pancanadianskylines/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Instagram</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Kitchener, two years later]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1638</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2021 04:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=20">plam</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1638</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm finally back in Kitchener (haven't quite made it to Waterloo yet). Haven't been here since December 2019. I'm housesitting at the Kaufman Lofts so I walked around a bit today---namely down to Grand River Rocks at Charles and Borden.<br />
<br />
It feels like most of the restaurants that were there in 2019 are still there, though not all. I remember reading about Gilt closing. I thought we had talked about Rainbow closing but I got a Jamaican patty today still. So the mass extinctions haven't happened so far?<br />
<br />
Certainly there are more cannabis shops than in 2019.<br />
<br />
There seems to be fewer holes in the urban fabric and a bunch of construction that is fairly low-rise directly on King St as a podium, going higher farther back. Certainly south of the market there is a lot going on. Also near City Hall.<br />
<br />
I did stop by Marche Leos to get some groceries for supper, it didn't seem totally out of control. I also tried to get a flu vaccine at Shoppers Drug Mart but they were out of stock until Monday. Maybe I'll try Phamily Pharmacy in Waterloo again, where I got a flu shot in 2018 I think.<br /><!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPG Image" border="0" alt=".jpg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=8090" target="_blank" title="">PXL_20211210_213052384~2.jpg</a> (Size: 140.45 KB / Downloads: 704)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm finally back in Kitchener (haven't quite made it to Waterloo yet). Haven't been here since December 2019. I'm housesitting at the Kaufman Lofts so I walked around a bit today---namely down to Grand River Rocks at Charles and Borden.<br />
<br />
It feels like most of the restaurants that were there in 2019 are still there, though not all. I remember reading about Gilt closing. I thought we had talked about Rainbow closing but I got a Jamaican patty today still. So the mass extinctions haven't happened so far?<br />
<br />
Certainly there are more cannabis shops than in 2019.<br />
<br />
There seems to be fewer holes in the urban fabric and a bunch of construction that is fairly low-rise directly on King St as a podium, going higher farther back. Certainly south of the market there is a lot going on. Also near City Hall.<br />
<br />
I did stop by Marche Leos to get some groceries for supper, it didn't seem totally out of control. I also tried to get a flu vaccine at Shoppers Drug Mart but they were out of stock until Monday. Maybe I'll try Phamily Pharmacy in Waterloo again, where I got a flu shot in 2018 I think.<br /><!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPG Image" border="0" alt=".jpg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=8090" target="_blank" title="">PXL_20211210_213052384~2.jpg</a> (Size: 140.45 KB / Downloads: 704)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Taking roofs off malls]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1622</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 21:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=20">plam</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1622</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi ijmorlan! G&amp;M talks about malls specifically not including roofs...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/industry-news/property-report/article-shopping-centre-redesign-should-we-even-call-it-a-mall-anymore/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business...l-anymore/</a><br />
<br />
I guess a question is whether you want to be inside or outside. I mean I don't particularly want to get rained on, and yet. But things like "Toronto Premium Outlets" just seem awful. Maybe if people lived there too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi ijmorlan! G&amp;M talks about malls specifically not including roofs...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/industry-news/property-report/article-shopping-centre-redesign-should-we-even-call-it-a-mall-anymore/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business...l-anymore/</a><br />
<br />
I guess a question is whether you want to be inside or outside. I mean I don't particularly want to get rained on, and yet. But things like "Toronto Premium Outlets" just seem awful. Maybe if people lived there too.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Proposed carless Auckland subdivision]]></title>
			<link>https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1621</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2021 22:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=20">plam</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/showthread.php?tid=1621</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Two minutes from a train station with pretty regular service to Auckland, no internal roads for cars, estimated 20% cheaper houses. Still pretty suburban SFH focus. Houses from NZ&#36;600-650k (about C&#36;550k let's say). Solves some of the problems but not all of them I guess. I'm OK with not solving all of the problems.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/climate-news/126595493/with-few-roads-a-new-development-offers-cheaper-auckland-housing" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/clim...nd-housing</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Two minutes from a train station with pretty regular service to Auckland, no internal roads for cars, estimated 20% cheaper houses. Still pretty suburban SFH focus. Houses from NZ&#36;600-650k (about C&#36;550k let's say). Solves some of the problems but not all of them I guess. I'm OK with not solving all of the problems.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/climate-news/126595493/with-few-roads-a-new-development-offers-cheaper-auckland-housing" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/clim...nd-housing</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>