+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: Grand River Transit (/showthread.php?tid=13)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
RE: Grand River Transit - bravado - 05-03-2023
(05-03-2023, 09:35 AM)danbrotherston Wrote:(05-03-2023, 07:30 AM)clasher Wrote: Strikes wouldn't work if they weren't disruptive.
Can you shout that a little louder for the folks in the back.
I find this so frustrating when people complain about this. Like sure...lets try and focus the disruption on the ruling class, but at the end of the day, disruption *IS* the power that workers have over employers...nothing more.
I especially hate it when people blame the striking workers exclusively for a strike...given the attitudes today, I do not see how it is possible that we have any labour protections today, most people seem perfectly willing to eat shit.
This is the utter lack of nuance that drives me nuts with union arguments.
It’s not ok to hold the region hostage to get your benefits, this isn’t a sustainable option for the future. Public employees just aren’t the same as private ones. In this case, the “ruling class” is all of us citizens.
RE: Grand River Transit - SF22 - 05-03-2023
(05-03-2023, 10:03 AM)bravado Wrote:(05-03-2023, 09:35 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Can you shout that a little louder for the folks in the back.
I find this so frustrating when people complain about this. Like sure...lets try and focus the disruption on the ruling class, but at the end of the day, disruption *IS* the power that workers have over employers...nothing more.
I especially hate it when people blame the striking workers exclusively for a strike...given the attitudes today, I do not see how it is possible that we have any labour protections today, most people seem perfectly willing to eat shit.
This is the utter lack of nuance that drives me nuts with union arguments.
It’s not ok to hold the region hostage to get your benefits, this isn’t a sustainable option for the future. Public employees just aren’t the same as private ones. In this case, the “ruling class” is all of us citizens.
If you find strikes that disruptive, then make your voice heard and tell the region to adequately meet their workers' needs so they don't have to strike anymore. No one WANTS to strike. It sucks, they know they're letting people down, but the alternative is letting themselves get taken advantage of by their employer. Strikes are the only reason we have so many of the benefits we enjoy today, like 40-hour workweeks and the concept of a weekend. The disruption is the point, and I will support them in it, because they set a positive precedent for workplace standards for the rest of us.
RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 05-03-2023
(05-03-2023, 10:03 AM)bravado Wrote:(05-03-2023, 09:35 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Can you shout that a little louder for the folks in the back.
I find this so frustrating when people complain about this. Like sure...lets try and focus the disruption on the ruling class, but at the end of the day, disruption *IS* the power that workers have over employers...nothing more.
I especially hate it when people blame the striking workers exclusively for a strike...given the attitudes today, I do not see how it is possible that we have any labour protections today, most people seem perfectly willing to eat shit.
This is the utter lack of nuance that drives me nuts with union arguments.
It’s not ok to hold the region hostage to get your benefits, this isn’t a sustainable option for the future. Public employees just aren’t the same as private ones. In this case, the “ruling class” is all of us citizens.
I don't think using phrasing like "held hostage" helps add nuance.
If you want nuance, then what you should say is that the region should be willing to put up with disruption to help put pressure on the union for a better deal. Of course, the fact is that we are not a monolith, some people, especially poor people are harmed much more by this strike than people who get to hob knob with our city council. To say nothing of the bureaucrats actually negotiating.
That being said, I don't know what you mean by public sector vs. private sector. I think unionized employees are generally in a better position than non-unionized workers, but I don't begrudge them the right to fight for better conditions. Everyone is underpaid today...well..with a small (say 1% ish) exception. It doesn't matter that they're doing better than people who are truly at the mercy of capitalist overloads so to speak.
RE: Grand River Transit - ijmorlan - 05-04-2023
(05-03-2023, 11:47 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: That being said, I don't know what you mean by public sector vs. private sector. I think unionized employees are generally in a better position than non-unionized workers, but I don't begrudge them the right to fight for better conditions. Everyone is underpaid today...well..with a small (say 1% ish) exception. It doesn't matter that they're doing better than people who are truly at the mercy of capitalist overloads so to speak.
Public sector means government and government funded organizations. Private sector means business. In the public sector in a democratic system, the owners are the people at large, as represented by the elected government. In the private sector, the owners are whichever individual owners or public shareholders happen to own the shares of the company (or are operating the unincorporated firm).
In the private sector, if the unions ask for too much and the managers give it to them, the business goes bankrupt. So managers have a real incentive to see to the business’ interests, and the unions can bargain vigorously but ultimately have to understand that there is only so much available. The union equalizes power between private interests.
In the public sector, if the unions ask for too much and managers give it to them, taxes go up and up and up. There is no effective mechanism for the populace to control the situation. An example is firefighter compensation (including pension), which I understand is absurdly high, to the point that every vacancy has hundreds or thousands of applicants. There is no reason why the entire populace should be taxed higher to pay above-market compensation to public employees. On the other hand, we shouldn’t expect to get highly skilled labour for cheap; I’ve seen it suggested that some public servants should be paid more so that better candidates can be attracted to the jobs.
RE: Grand River Transit - KevinL - 05-04-2023
The issue with firefighters is that every single one works for a public entity; there is no private equivalent of a firefighting service, so there's no way to see what a competitive salary would be. This applies to other specialized positions like police.
Bus drivers, however, can be found working for both public and private entities. It's much easier to see what a competitive salary is and what direction that job market is going in.
RE: Grand River Transit - ijmorlan - 05-04-2023
(05-04-2023, 04:58 PM)KevinL Wrote: The issue with firefighters is that every single one works for a public entity; there is no private equivalent of a firefighting service, so there's no way to see what a competitive salary would be. This applies to other specialized positions like police.
Bus drivers, however, can be found working for both public and private entities. It's much easier to see what a competitive salary is and what direction that job market is going in.
That’s true. However, price comparison is not the only way to evaluate what the market price is. If there is a massive oversupply of something, then the price is too high, and if there is a massive shortage, the price is too low. So if every job opening attracts hundreds of qualified applicants, it’s probably the case that the salary could be cut significantly without affecting fire safety, and there would also be the additional benefit of less work for the hiring team to wade through all those resumés. Similarly, if it’s hard to hire for a position, one possible fix is to increase the offered wages.
RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 05-05-2023
(05-04-2023, 04:58 PM)KevinL Wrote: The issue with firefighters is that every single one works for a public entity; there is no private equivalent of a firefighting service, so there's no way to see what a competitive salary would be. This applies to other specialized positions like police.
Bus drivers, however, can be found working for both public and private entities. It's much easier to see what a competitive salary is and what direction that job market is going in.
I don't really think this is a reasonable way of determining the "competitive salary"...
Private companies aren't operating on the razors edge of bankruptcy corporate profits have only grown in the past decades. Their wages are strongly depressed. Even if you look at unionised positions, it's not great, largely as a result of the weakness of unions I suspect.
Lack or excess of supply of qualified applicants is a reasonable argument for raising or decreasing pay. But have we not heard from GRT for the past year that they cannot hire enough operators?
As for "incentive for keeping costs down"...I really don't think that's true. Politicians are motivated to keep taxes low just as much as a CEO is motivated to increase shareholder profits, and frankly, for exactly the same reason.
RE: Grand River Transit - ijmorlan - 05-05-2023
(05-05-2023, 12:59 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Lack or excess of supply of qualified applicants is a reasonable argument for raising or decreasing pay. But have we not heard from GRT for the past year that they cannot hire enough operators?
Indeed! And they’re not the only employer with low wages to complain that they can’t find workers.
It would be interesting if GRT eventually fixed their recruitment problem by acceding to the union’s demands. Of course it’s not that simple — raising wages now won’t instantly make more people have bus driving licenses. But it can be expected to cause some people to consider a change of career.
RE: Grand River Transit - ijmorlan - 05-05-2023
(05-04-2023, 04:58 PM)KevinL Wrote: The issue with firefighters is that every single one works for a public entity; there is no private equivalent of a firefighting service, so there's no way to see what a competitive salary would be. This applies to other specialized positions like police.
I just remembered there is another issue with firefighter salaries: I suggested that part of the issue was that the employer’s representatives don’t have a robust incentive to negotiate forcefully. But actually firefighter wages are settled by an arbitrator who has no incentive or even a mandate to consider the appropriateness of the wages and the willingness of the employer to pay. I think they compare to other jurisdictions in a way that tends to result in the salaries ratcheting up and up and up.
Actually I shouldn’t pick on firefighters only. I think the same problem exists with the police as well. I’m not sure about paramedics; for some reason I feel like I haven’t heard the same thing about them.
Maybe we can make a deal: governments can decide on their own how much to pay their police and firefighters, but they’re not allowed to complain if they have few applicants.
RE: Grand River Transit - ac3r - 05-08-2023
A tentative agreement was reached - again. If they vote yes, service may resume Thursday. However given how much they're asking for, the region may say no.
https://kitchener.citynews.ca/2023/05/08/tentative-agreement-reached-between-union-region/
RE: Grand River Transit - KevinL - 05-08-2023
Isn't the offer before the membership now? So it wouldn't be the region saying no, but the drivers.
RE: Grand River Transit - tomh009 - 05-08-2023
(05-08-2023, 07:44 PM)KevinL Wrote: Isn't the offer before the membership now? So it wouldn't be the region saying no, but the drivers.
That's correct.
RE: Grand River Transit - ac3r - 05-09-2023
They voted yes and transit should be back this week.
RE: Grand River Transit - panamaniac - 05-09-2023
Any reports on the terms of the agreement?
RE: Grand River Transit - dtkvictim - 05-09-2023
Quote:Waterloo Region – Grand River Transit bus service will resume on Thursday, May 11 following UNIFOR Local 4304’s vote to accept an agreement with the Region of Waterloo.
We understand that residents rely on transit on a daily basis and to show our appreciation for our customers, no fares will be collected on transit from Thursday, May 11, up to and including May 22, Victoria Day. Customers who purchased a May monthly pass before May 8 will receive a June pass.