![]() |
|
Grand River Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Grand River Transit (/showthread.php?tid=13) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
|
RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 12-19-2025 (12-19-2025, 05:13 PM)MidTowner Wrote:(12-19-2025, 04:50 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Yeah, the seniors thing pisses me off too. I should clarify, in this case I specifically mean inter-city transit. Yeah Waterloo's transit isn't terrible by North American standards...but if I want to go to London I have an absolute shitshow of a time. There are four different bus options, three of which are beyond terrible, none of which integrate with anything else, or a single train that is only slightly faster than biking. This is what "competition" in a natural monopoly brings...abundance of mediocrity. If it was just within KW...I'd probably take transit...I even have easy passes (and for London too)...but again, my social network is moderately like minded, so most people and places I'd like to visit live within easy reach of transit, so that makes it easier. It is actually visiting family which is more complicated. RE: Grand River Transit - ijmorlan - 12-19-2025 (12-19-2025, 04:06 PM)MidTowner Wrote: Seniors are more likely to use transit at off-peak times, so that would be one reason to extend this kind of thing to them and not others, making better use of the capacity. No, it’s a reason to discount transit in off-peak times. Instead of targetting people based on sometimes-not-even-true-on-average stereotypes, target the actual thing that matters, in this case encouraging people to use the system when it’s not busy so that we can get closer to full use of the system. RE: Grand River Transit - SammyOES - 12-19-2025 (12-19-2025, 07:16 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: No, it’s a reason to discount transit in off-peak times. Instead of targetting people based on sometimes-not-even-true-on-average stereotypes, target the actual thing that matters, in this case encouraging people to use the system when it’s not busy so that we can get closer to full use of the system. Targeting time of day makes a ton of sense. RE: Grand River Transit - ac3r - 12-19-2025 I love when public services are run like a business. And fail! RE: Grand River Transit - Acitta - 12-21-2025 (12-19-2025, 03:34 PM)SammyOES Wrote: Does anyone else have a problem with this: As a low income senior, I am in favour of this. RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 12-22-2025 (12-19-2025, 07:16 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(12-19-2025, 04:06 PM)MidTowner Wrote: Seniors are more likely to use transit at off-peak times, so that would be one reason to extend this kind of thing to them and not others, making better use of the capacity. It's a reason for either, or both. The kind of thinking in your response risks making the perfect the enemy of the good. I don't disagree that making transit more accessible for all demographics is what we should want to do. If that's not achievable right now, but making transit more accessible for seniors is, I think that's a good thing. RE: Grand River Transit - bravado - 12-22-2025 I think that if we want nice, reliable public services, they have to be financially sustainable. You should have to pay ~something~ to use a nice and reliable service, or else it won't be that way for very long. There might be some value in means-testing these sorts of programs, but we really need to get used to the idea of "nice things cost money". Without any means-testing, it's pretty clear: seniors are the wealthiest cohort in Canada (by quite a lot) and getting wealthier faster than all the others. This is a strange proposal to subsidize the wealthy under the guise of accessibility. As for time of use... even an empty bus needs to be paid for by somebody. RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 12-22-2025 (12-22-2025, 10:45 AM)bravado Wrote: I think that if we want nice, reliable public services, they have to be financially sustainable. You should have to pay ~something~ to use a nice and reliable service, or else it won't be that way for very long. I disagree with this belief. KW has free libraries that are excellent. Parking and roads are also free and vary but at least in the Netherlands are excellent. I think pricing can be used as a useful signal (ie parking shouldn’t be free Because it’s harmful, rush hour transit in Toronto shouldn’t be free because demand outstrips supply) but isn’t a necessary component of delivering a valuable excellent service. We can pay for these things with taxation instead of fees. And pricing something isn’t free, the very act of acting pricing ads friction and effort above and beyond the actual sticker price so as a society we should only use it where it makes sense. RE: Grand River Transit - SammyOES - 12-23-2025 (12-22-2025, 10:45 AM)bravado Wrote: As for time of use... even an empty bus needs to be paid for by somebody. Sure, but the extra cost per passenger is extremely low compared to the cost of just running the bus. Which makes it a good opportunity for promotions that raise awareness of the bus system, builds comfort with the bus system, and encourages more rides in general. Really the only cost is that you’ll eat into your ridership where people can shift their usage from paid times to cheaper times. But that’s ok in lots of situations. Anyway; I’d love it much more than targeting a demographic that I really don’t believe needs it. And the low-income seniors that do need help with affording the bus should be able to move a lot of their trips to the cheap time. RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 12-27-2025 New Year's Eve is next week. London Transit Commission, Guelph Transit, Hamilton Street Railway, Go Transit, TTC, OC Transpo, Niagara Transit, all have free transit after a certain time. GRT, however, does not. RE: Grand River Transit - timc - 12-28-2025 We used to. I still don't know why it was eliminated. RE: Grand River Transit - tomh009 - 12-30-2025 I don't know that I would characterize this site as toxic, and usually things stay within the guardrails (Waterloo Region!). Unfortunately Kodra24 threw in a Zelensky corruption accusation into a GRT thread and things went off the rails from there. I will move the off-topic comments to a more appropriate thread. RE: Grand River Transit - Bob_McBob - 01-01-2026 (12-27-2025, 09:45 AM)MidTowner Wrote: New Year's Eve is next week. I heard multiple drivers calling in to ask if they were supposed to be doing free rides for NYE on the scanner. And ION security calling in name checks for fare evaders as late as 11:40pm. Surely they have something better to do tonight. It's embarrassing. RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 01-02-2026 (01-01-2026, 01:23 AM)Bob_McBob Wrote:(12-27-2025, 09:45 AM)MidTowner Wrote: New Year's Eve is next week. That is nuts. Free transit on New Year's Eve is practically a tradition in North America by now. Driving under the influence is still very much an issue, and giving people more easy options to get home safely is a good thing. As with other initiatives to increase access, it's also good sales and marketing. I was thinking on New Year's Eve, additionally, the weather was bad. I know there is little chance of this happening here in Waterloo Region, but there is nothing stopping GRT from offering fare-free rides during inclement weather. If they are planning on running the Ion, but the police services are telling people to avoid traveling by car if possible, I think it would make sense to let people board without a fare. RE: Grand River Transit - ijmorlan - 01-03-2026 (01-02-2026, 08:16 AM)MidTowner Wrote:(01-01-2026, 01:23 AM)Bob_McBob Wrote: I heard multiple drivers calling in to ask if they were supposed to be doing free rides for NYE on the scanner. And ION security calling in name checks for fare evaders as late as 11:40pm. Surely they have something better to do tonight. It's embarrassing. Free fares during inclement weather is actually a bad idea. You take a rush hour when transit is already busy, and dump a bunch more people on that don’t normally take it, while collecting no additional fares. So the version of transit that the new people see is the worst version of it, and you can’t really take the sudden surge anyway. Additionally, loyal customers who are already using a monthly pass get no benefit whatsoever, and in fact get worse service due to the extra people. Free fares on New Year’s, by contrast, is a great idea. It’s not rush hour, so you’re not further overburdening the system. And since it’s planned, you can run sufficient service to meet the need. |