+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: Grand River Transit (/showthread.php?tid=13)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
RE: Grand River Transit - KevinL - 03-08-2017
The end is nigh for having to buy paper @GRT_ROW tickets. Huzzah! pic.twitter.com/gqqhTOLwGT
— Mike Boos (@mikeboos) March 8, 2017
RE: Grand River Transit - chutten - 03-08-2017
(03-08-2017, 12:05 PM)KevinL Wrote: The end is nigh for having to buy paper @GRT_ROW tickets. Huzzah!
FINALLY.
RE: Grand River Transit - dunkalunk - 03-08-2017
Speaking with GRT staff, September. We won't get farecards until September.
RE: Grand River Transit - KevinL - 03-08-2017
It is the traditional date for introducing new changes - the Tuesday after Labour Day, specifically. But given this would be replacing monthly passes, I guess it will be the First.
RE: Grand River Transit - nms - 03-10-2017
The "Buses only" left-turn sign is in the vicinity of the Father David Bauer Drive/Caroline intersection, presumably to warn drivers heading north past that point that they can't turn west. From what I can recall, it's never been covered up since the intersection opened. Perhaps just an oversight for now.
RE: Grand River Transit - yige_t - 03-18-2017
The tender for nine (9) ION aBRT buses will be awarded to New Flyer at a unit price of approx. $600,000. These buses will have frameless windows, high back seating and USB charging ports (a first for Canadian transit buses, I believe).
RE: Grand River Transit - KevinL - 03-20-2017
Strike deadline just passed, but no news on negotiations. Hopefully a good sign?
RE: Grand River Transit - trainspotter139 - 03-20-2017
- A tentative agreement has been reached between the Region of Waterloo and UNIFOR Local 4304 Grand River Transit/MobilityPLUS, operators, dispatchers, fleet mechanics and service attendants.
Ratification dates have yet to be set.
Having reached this agreement, there will be no disruption and all services will continue as scheduled.
http://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/newslist/index.aspx?corpId=58cynQlfgqiAYQyTLmpurQeQuAleQuAl&newsId=Qi0dx5lA5H2wp21PlUsw2N5lA5H9SPUWweQuAleQuAl
RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 03-23-2017
The federal budget yesterday scrapped the transit tax credit, which made transit passes about 15% less expensive.
Depending on how price elastic demand for transit is, that could be a significant headwind for transit ridership growth everywhere. Or just a very minor one. I personally won't be surprised to see it mentioned to justify slower-than-anticipated ridership growth on many services' reports in a year or two's time.
RE: Grand River Transit - tomh009 - 03-23-2017
(03-23-2017, 07:21 AM)MidTowner Wrote: The federal budget yesterday scrapped the transit tax credit, which made transit passes about 15% less expensive.
Depending on how price elastic demand for transit is, that could be a significant headwind for transit ridership growth everywhere. Or just a very minor one. I personally won't be surprised to see it mentioned to justify slower-than-anticipated ridership growth on many services' reports in a year or two's time.
They did say that they would provide the funding directly to municipalities for transit instead. At least that's what I heard.
RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 03-23-2017
I think that's rightt: the logic was that capital funding would be provided to municipalities for improved transit, so the tax credit was not needed.
I don't know what would have a bigger impact on user behaviour: better service, or a very visible "discount." Maybe it would depend exactly how the money was spent by each jurisdiction.
RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 03-23-2017
(03-23-2017, 09:21 AM)MidTowner Wrote: I think that's rightt: the logic was that capital funding would be provided to municipalities for improved transit, so the tax credit was not needed.
I don't know what would have a bigger impact on user behaviour: better service, or a very visible "discount." Maybe it would depend exactly how the money was spent by each jurisdiction.
This is a tricky question, I see both sides, well, two sides, not the third. Providing municipalities money is great, but it's an entirely different policy from discounting transit, which changes people's perception. People love discounts. Still, perhaps increased funding could eventually improve service, which we all know is the most effective way to improve ridership. But it's a long bumpy road.
However, the tax credit wasn't refundable, therefore those who didn't make enough didn't benefit from it. Worse, those who used tickets because they couldn't afford passes, also don't benefit from it. A direct subsidy for those who have the most difficulty affording it would probably be a more egalitarian use of money. Whether it's more effective at increasing use of transit, who knows.
Still, we really should be doing all three.
RE: Grand River Transit - Markster - 03-23-2017
I would frankly prefer direct funding of the transit agencies. Which is in effect what we are receiving, as the feds have recently announced all kinds of transit funding.
The tax credit is great for those who (a) have regular enough employment to buy monthly passes, (b) earn enough to pay taxes, and © have the attention to detail to properly fill in relevant parts of their tax forms.
I look at this and think to myself, why are we only giving discounts to those people, and not to everyone who uses the bus? What makes this set of people more deserving than the rest?
RE: Grand River Transit - Viewfromthe42 - 03-23-2017
The one thing that I wonder about is, when council decides that GRT needs a 50% cost recovery ratio, could (in support of fares) the feds decide that direct funding had to be counted on the rider portion of those equations? Say, provide GRT with 5% of its annual costs, but require this to be placed on the rider side of targets? I feel like part of the risk of direct funding is that a council will take it and add it to the council side of the ledger, and use it, effectively, to lower the amount that property tax funds transit, while not changing how much transit fares fund transit, which translates into having "transit funding" support cars, by way of being redistributed across the tax base, the largest share of which is drivers, while doing nothing to improve service or lower transit costs to users.
RE: Grand River Transit - tomh009 - 03-23-2017
(03-23-2017, 11:33 AM)Markster Wrote: I would frankly prefer direct funding of the transit agencies. Which is in effect what we are receiving, as the feds have recently announced all kinds of transit funding.
The tax credit is great for those who (a) have regular enough employment to buy monthly passes, (b) earn enough to pay taxes, and © have the attention to detail to properly fill in relevant parts of their tax forms.
I look at this and think to myself, why are we only giving discounts to those people, and not to everyone who uses the bus? What makes this set of people more deserving than the rest?
I'm thinking of a funding model whereby every transit agency would receive a federal government subsidy equivalent to, say, 20% of fare revenue would work well. It's better than a fixed subsidy because (1) it directly subsidizes the fares, whether trip or monthly, and (2) it increases as transit usage increases.
It's nice to dream.
