Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
GO Transit
If there were actually two-way, all-day train service between Kitchener and Toronto in less than five years' time, I wouldn't consider that "slow as molasses."
Reply


(01-30-2019, 02:11 PM)MidTowner Wrote: If there were actually two-way, all-day train service between Kitchener and Toronto in less than five years' time, I wouldn't consider that "slow as molasses."

I mean that actual train itself.. Two hours is ridiculous for a trip...
Reply
Oh, I see. You're definitely right about that.

I don't really consider added trains (if they still travel at that molasses pace, as you say) to be "service improvements" when we already have two-way, all-day service on the bus/train combination. You're definitely right that adding frequency of train service is only part of the equation, maybe not even the most important part.
Reply
(01-30-2019, 02:48 PM)MidTowner Wrote: Oh, I see. You're definitely right about that.

I don't really consider added trains (if they still travel at that molasses pace, as you say) to be "service improvements" when we already have two-way, all-day service on the bus/train combination. You're definitely right that adding frequency of train service is only part of the equation, maybe not even the most important part.

I think single seat trips are an improvement (I hate standing in the cold in Bramalea), but I'd agree that buses vs. train shouldn't be as big a deal as some feel.

I'd agree frequency and service window are important, and replacing bus trips with train trips would barely qualify as an improvement in these metrics.

As for slowness of trip, absolutely, and ironically, the Bus-Bus trip late at night beats the train trip easily.
Reply
A question for all the upcoming TWAD trips would be how many available locomotives and passenger cars does GO have for those timeframes? If we've learned anything about vehicles, it's that it's a long process to procure them. If we're missing trains, given their timelines, that's where you start to measure how serious a government is.

After a few times being in Germany, I was impressed by how many trips work seamlessly by what seem to be two-car LRVs. They would do the equivalent of driving from London to Stratford to Kitchener to Guelph, on a regular basis (can't recall if it was 60 or 30 min frequency), but within those cities, they would stop at several locations, not just the central location, acting akin to an LRT route in town, helping people get closer to their destination, or avoid additional transfers.
Reply
(01-30-2019, 03:41 PM)Viewfromthe42 Wrote: A question for all the upcoming TWAD trips would be how many available locomotives and passenger cars does GO have for those timeframes? If we've learned anything about vehicles, it's that it's a long process to procure them. If we're missing trains, given their timelines, that's where you start to measure how serious a government is.

Standard train cars (and especially the bilevel coaches BBD builds for GO Transit) are much quicker delivery than bespoke LRT configurations. For the last order BBD built delivered about 100 cars to GO in 2018, and I believe the lead time was less than a year.
Reply
(01-30-2019, 04:59 PM)tomh009 Wrote:
(01-30-2019, 03:41 PM)Viewfromthe42 Wrote: A question for all the upcoming TWAD trips would be how many available locomotives and passenger cars does GO have for those timeframes? If we've learned anything about vehicles, it's that it's a long process to procure them. If we're missing trains, given their timelines, that's where you start to measure how serious a government is.

Standard train cars (and especially the bilevel coaches BBD builds for GO Transit) are much quicker delivery than bespoke LRT configurations. For the last order BBD built delivered about 100 cars to GO in 2018, and I believe the lead time was less than a year.

There's also the locomotive situation, but I would expect those are fairly well standardized as well.
Reply


(01-30-2019, 02:11 PM)MidTowner Wrote: If there were actually two-way, all-day train service between Kitchener and Toronto in less than five years' time, I wouldn't consider that "slow as molasses."

Why though?

What's stopping them from doing it this year?
Reply
1. CN owns the line from Bramalea to Georgetown, where the trains have to cross to get from the Georgetown south corridor to the North Mainline to Kitchener. Talks with CN have been slow in the past.
2. Operators. I've read that the lead time to get new conductors trained is not short. And it'd require some extra people to get enough to cover the new schedule.
Reply
Even without the CN issue, two-way, all-day service would mean something like sixteen trains a day each way (I'm assuming that it would be similar service levels to Lakeshore West when it first got two-way, all-day, so hourly). That's a big increase in service levels relative to what we have today.

Getting that done anywhere, by any agency, in a year would be a very tall order. I had never read about the long lead time for new conductors, but that makes sense. Allocating resources to triple service takes time, and I am assuming (and hoping) it will be done incrementally. So, if we have that level of service running sometime in 2023, I really will be impressed.
Reply
Over on UrbanToronto, there are a few who are much more knowledgeable about these things than I. Typically comes up every few weeks.
Reply
In other news, I was on the 605 express this morning, which was supposed to arrive at 756. Finally arrived at to Union at 955, after turning local and back to express between Bramalea and Union.
Reply
(01-30-2019, 07:43 PM)jwilliamson Wrote:
(01-30-2019, 04:59 PM)tomh009 Wrote: Standard train cars (and especially the bilevel coaches BBD builds for GO Transit) are much quicker delivery than bespoke LRT configurations. For the last order BBD built delivered about 100 cars to GO in 2018, and I believe the lead time was less than a year.

There's also the locomotive situation, but I would expect those are fairly well standardized as well.

GO Transit is the biggest customer for the MPI MPXpress locomotives. There should be no real manufacturing challenges, just the order lead time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPI_MPXpress
Reply


Does anyone know why Metrolinx has not installed automated fare machines at the Kitchener Terminal, Sportsworld, and Cambridge yet? I took the 25 to Square One and the number of people who 1) Had to buy their ticket on the bus or 2) Had no idea where they were going was staggering and it made us 20 minutes late. 

They have them at the train station but they would only really ever get used before 7 am weekdays.

Most seem like they were going to Union Station but service in this area to downtown Toronto on the weekend is just abysmal. At least you can take the 30 to Bramalea and grab the GO train during the week.
Reply
(02-02-2019, 12:29 PM)Thenewsroom99 Wrote: Does anyone know why Metrolinx has not installed automated fare machines at the Kitchener Terminal, Sportsworld, and Cambridge yet? I took the 25 to Square One and the number of people who 1) Had to buy their ticket on the bus or 2) Had no idea where they were going was staggering and it made us 20 minutes late. 

They have them at the train station but they would only really ever get used before 7 am weekdays.

Most seem like they were going to Union Station but service in this area to downtown Toronto on the weekend is just abysmal. At least you can take the 30 to Bramalea and grab the GO train during the week.

The Charles St Terminal is intended to close as soon as ION service starts. They will likely install the kiosk at King/Victoria.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links