Posts: 10,807
Threads: 67
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
385
(09-19-2021, 09:47 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: (09-17-2021, 04:17 PM)Bytor Wrote: Kitchener→Union Station is finally competitive time-wise after the recent minimal upgrade work (1:41 station to station, vs ~1:50 driving), it's just not convenient in terms of scheduling. However, track work can still be done K→U as the best possible time for an all-stops run with Class 3 tracks and 2 minute dwells is ~1:27. Inwards past Mount Pleasant the stations are too close together for trains to go any faster, but Class 5 tracks would shorten up K→MP times and the complete all-stops run would be ~1:16, making it competitive with cars outside of rush hour as well.
A K→U express (skipping everything between Mount Pleasant and Union), at Class 6 speeds would take roughly 59 minutes.
If there's interest, I could produce similar stats for L→K.
Thanks for working this out. It’s really amazing how much improvement would be possible with changes that would be much less expensive than building HSR.
1:27 is respectable (with current track). 1:16 is already quite good. Presumably either one of these would be somewhat better with an express service, too.
Are any of these improved by removing some of the current level crossings? Or are those already good enough to not have an impact?
Posts: 836
Threads: 5
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation:
71
(09-19-2021, 08:41 PM)tomh009 Wrote: (09-19-2021, 09:47 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: Thanks for working this out. It’s really amazing how much improvement would be possible with changes that would be much less expensive than building HSR.
1:27 is respectable (with current track). 1:16 is already quite good. Presumably either one of these would be somewhat better with an express service, too.
Are any of these improved by removing some of the current level crossings? Or are those already good enough to not have an impact?
Level crossings with crossbucks can be used for Class 6 tracks (110mph, 177km/h), according to my understanding of Transport Canada rail regulations, so none of them would need to be removed. The only modifications I assumed for my numbers was getting ride of the small number of curves that were too small a radius.
Posts: 1,569
Threads: 28
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation:
156
Not Just Bikes: Commuter rail is a rail system designed to bring people from the suburbs into a central business district for work. But is it really an efficient transit system, or just another subsidy provided to car-dependent suburbanites? This video explores commuter rail in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), the train system known as "GO Transit."
The Trains that Subsidize Suburbia - GO Transit Commuter Rail
Posts: 1,101
Threads: 6
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
99
GO train speeds to more than quadruple through Guelph - Guelph News
https://www.guelphtoday.com/local-news/g...ph-4515823
Posts: 1,095
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
33
I saw some back of the napkin calculations that showed this roughly translated to only a few minutes time savings because the stretch of track with the speed increase is so short (~2k from Hanlon to Guelph station). But I guess any increase is better than the current crawl into Guelph station.
Posts: 4,476
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2015
Reputation:
208
(10-16-2021, 01:24 PM)timio Wrote: I saw some back of the napkin calculations that showed this roughly translated to only a few minutes time savings because the stretch of track with the speed increase is so short (~2k from Hanlon to Guelph station). But I guess any increase is better than the current crawl into Guelph station.
A few minutes here, a few minutes there … not too long until the service is noticeably better than before. But yes, each individual area has only so much potential for improvement.
Posts: 4,593
Threads: 16
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
147
On the east side of Guelph station, I understand the bridge is getting rehabilitated (and perhaps double-tracked?) as well.
Posts: 1,095
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
33
Replacing the spans for single track, but leaving capacity for future growth.
https://blog.metrolinx.com/2021/05/13/gu...expansion/
Posts: 2,004
Threads: 7
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
125
I believe they replaced the Speed River spans over a few weekends a few weeks ago.
Posts: 1,103
Threads: 3
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
60
Still working on them today — drove past as a large span of the bridge was missing. Tons of people stopping to take photos
Posts: 836
Threads: 5
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation:
71
Posts: 836
Threads: 5
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation:
71
Waterloo Region takes step towards closing Duke Street for transit hub
https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-...t-hub.html
Posts: 820
Threads: 5
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation:
42
Posts: 7,987
Threads: 39
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
213
Gee, if only they had some way to gain ownership over the corridor.
Frankly, I'm not even remotely surprised...I don't get any sense of urgency or goals from any of Metrolinx. They're going through the motions...something might get built eventually, but they aren't pushing on it.
Posts: 157
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
15
(12-02-2021, 11:05 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Gee, if only they had some way to gain ownership over the corridor.
Frankly, I'm not even remotely surprised...I don't get any sense of urgency or goals from any of Metrolinx. They're going through the motions...something might get built eventually, but they aren't pushing on it.
To be fair, I don't think Metrolinx can expropriate a railway as that's within federal jurisdiction. That being said, why on Earth they haven't worked with the federal govt to expropriate it is beyond me.
|
