Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
26 Charles St W | 44 fl | Proposed
#7
(05-31-2022, 06:20 PM)Lebronj23 Wrote: Yah true, maybe the region person wrote it down wrong or counted the two underground. I count 44 on the render as well

Yeah they probably included the two underground. I mean...technically those would count as floors but for most people when they see a building from outside they're just counting the ones from the ground elevation up, which in this case would make it 44. Both plans say "44 + (2 U/G LEVELS)" on the architectural plans.

(05-31-2022, 05:28 PM)nms Wrote: What makes 44 floors the magic number (eg this tower and 88 Queen St S)?  For the last batch of towers, 25 floors generally seemed to be the topping out number.  After 44 floors, what's the next common height?

It could be something to do with zoning in the City of Kitchener...I'm not 100% sure though as I have only worked on 1 skyscraper project in this region (Victoria and Park) so I don't know the nuances of local zoning enough to say.

Either that, or it's just something IN8 is choosing to do. If it's this, it makes sense because 30 Francis was approved with almost no opposition and that had to go through rezoning unlike these two, so maybe they're just hoping that if these two projects are both 44 floors, then they'll be less likely to face opposition from NIMBYs. I'm too lazy to check the architectural plans again but I believe they are, at the very least, different heights despite the same floor count so they will hopefully not look too same-y if that's the case although the cut and paste design of the tower will probably do no no favours. I suspect these 3 skyscrapers will look like horrific monoliths just like Duke Tower does.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
26 Charles St W | 44 fl | Proposed - by Lebronj23 - 05-16-2022, 12:34 PM
RE: 26 Charles St W | 44 fl | Proposed - by ac3r - 05-31-2022, 05:48 PM
RE: 26 Charles St W | 44 fl | Proposed - by ac3r - 05-31-2022, 07:15 PM
RE: 26 Charles St W | 44 fl | Proposed - by nms - 05-31-2022, 05:28 PM
RE: 26 Charles St W | 44 fl | Proposed - by CP42 - 06-01-2022, 11:26 AM
RE: 26 Charles St W | 44 fl | Proposed - by ac3r - 06-08-2022, 01:20 PM
RE: 26 Charles St W | 44 fl | Proposed - by ac3r - 06-17-2022, 03:43 PM
RE: 26 Charles St W | 44 fl | Proposed - by Chris - 06-23-2022, 10:10 AM
RE: 26 Charles St W | 44 fl | Proposed - by ac3r - 10-04-2022, 01:19 PM
RE: 26 Charles St W | 44 fl | Proposed - by ac3r - 10-04-2022, 04:24 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links