06-07-2022, 11:08 PM
Nice to see as much pro-input (or at least constructive criticism if not blanket support) in there as there is. Especially considering 1/3 of the emails are just copy and pasting the arguments from Livable Victoria Park or whoever in the VPNA did everyone's homework for them.
The arguments of "ok with change/development, but not this" are wholly unconvincing, proven by literally every other mid-rise proposed in the city that gets opposed and dragged out for ages. It would be nice if efforts to comment were better spent on realistic improvements to the design and streetscape, for instance, that hyperbole about how they will be doomed to live in shadows and traffic congestion.
The arguments of "ok with change/development, but not this" are wholly unconvincing, proven by literally every other mid-rise proposed in the city that gets opposed and dragged out for ages. It would be nice if efforts to comment were better spent on realistic improvements to the design and streetscape, for instance, that hyperbole about how they will be doomed to live in shadows and traffic congestion.