06-21-2022, 11:22 AM
It seemed based on the questions a lot of hay was made out of potential traffic impacts (real or perceived), which council seemed unwilling to accept were adjusted based on historical variance for the pandemic and that a proposal was recommended by both sets of staff. They also really could benefit from using a different term than "road widening" for the regional land allocation since repeated explanations still didn't convey it wasn't necessarily vehicular ROW (though skepticism is perhaps merited).
If the developer takes this to the OLT, I think they are still getting it through. Perhaps it could be less tall for the location, but staff also repeatedly pointed out is neither abuts a zone for low density / single detached and its across the road from blocks that do.
If the developer takes this to the OLT, I think they are still getting it through. Perhaps it could be less tall for the location, but staff also repeatedly pointed out is neither abuts a zone for low density / single detached and its across the road from blocks that do.