07-14-2023, 02:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-14-2023, 02:11 PM by cherrypark.)
(07-14-2023, 09:06 AM)Acitta Wrote: It is disappointing that they want to replace those row houses when there is a large empty lot next to them that could be built on first.
Can't do much if the vacant owner wants to pay to keep it that way. One of many examples where low utility lots should have to pay a premium for staying that way (vacants, parking lots, etc.). As of right now, there is obviously not enough incentive to off-load the land instead of holding it to speculate (or avoid remediating if that is the case).

