Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Cambridge urban cores
#15
(07-04-2024, 06:34 PM)bravado Wrote: I personally find it a bit grotesque to use the power of the public government to protect buildings and property that the public can't use. The expansion of Heritage™ as yet another exclusionary consultant specialty has frozen so much of our cities in time and protected the incumbent landowners at the expense of anything new. It's a horrible project with a name that nobody could be publicly against and is an awful, awful thing for cities that are supposed to be fluid, growing, and not stagnant.

Wellington tried to delist a bunch of heritage landmarks in its new plan but got turned down for technical reasons. They're probably going to get delisted following the proper procedure though.

https://thespinoff.co.nz/society/17-02-2...y-oil-tank

Quote:Wellington’s independent hearing panel this week recommended a former British Imperial Oil storage tank in Miramar should receive heritage protection in the District Plan. Wellington city council’s heritage evaluators found the tank had value as “an increasingly rare representative example of bulk storage tanks erected nationally in the 1920s”.

The tank is on land owned by Sir Peter Jackson and Dame Fran Walsh, and they are not happy about the heritage listing. They bought the land to build film infrastructure, and rusty oil tanks are not very useful in the movie business. Two of their companies, Wētā FX and Wingnut Films, made submissions asking the panel to reject heritage protections. 
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Cambridge urban cores - by panamaniac - 01-08-2017, 10:02 AM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by Canard - 01-08-2017, 10:09 AM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by Spokes - 01-08-2017, 10:52 AM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by Drake - 01-08-2017, 10:57 AM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by panamaniac - 01-08-2017, 11:00 AM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by Drake - 01-09-2017, 07:30 AM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by DHLawrence - 01-09-2017, 12:03 AM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by Viewfromthe42 - 01-09-2017, 10:24 AM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by DHLawrence - 01-09-2017, 09:25 PM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by nms - 01-09-2017, 02:03 PM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by panamaniac - 01-09-2017, 06:28 PM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by rangersfan - 04-13-2017, 05:48 AM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by Viewfromthe42 - 03-08-2018, 10:04 AM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by bravado - 07-04-2024, 06:34 PM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by plam - 07-05-2024, 07:22 PM
RE: Cambridge urban cores - by bravado - 03-26-2026, 07:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links