08-26-2025, 03:40 PM
So this was an interesting read:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/o...-1.7615644
I will say that this appeal is interesting:
""This conclusion disregards entirely that the carrying capacity of the roadways for motor vehicles transporting people and goods will be increased by the restoration of a lane for motor vehicle traffic," reads the appeal."
The courts finding specifically states that providing alternatives to driving helps reduce congestion because it moves more people. But the governments document seems to suggest that the only things that matter in the city are motor vehicles. Very revealing about the Ministry of Transport's position there.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/o...-1.7615644
I will say that this appeal is interesting:
""This conclusion disregards entirely that the carrying capacity of the roadways for motor vehicles transporting people and goods will be increased by the restoration of a lane for motor vehicle traffic," reads the appeal."
The courts finding specifically states that providing alternatives to driving helps reduce congestion because it moves more people. But the governments document seems to suggest that the only things that matter in the city are motor vehicles. Very revealing about the Ministry of Transport's position there.

