11-24-2025, 10:45 PM
(11-24-2025, 10:06 PM)plam Wrote:(11-24-2025, 01:50 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Tell me where he is “balancing”. I’ve seen only pro oil, environmentally destructive decisions. The first thing he did was cancel the carbon tax. That has no tariff relation.
There's a statement about "no pipelines until carbon capture". Given that carbon capture doesn't actually work....
Well ... no fossil fuels is a much better solution than carbon capture. But if you are unable/unwilling to give up fossil fuels, carbon capture is much less bad than no carbon capture.
Norway does have a working CCS setup, with 30 MT stored so far. Dwarfed by the CO2 emissions from burning oil, but, as I said, still better than not doing anything.

