05-29-2026, 08:48 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-29-2026, 08:48 AM by danbrotherston.)
(05-29-2026, 07:55 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:(05-29-2026, 07:40 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: I'm sorry, you're suggesting that forcibly displacing a population of indigenous people is a solution for anything? I feel like we've tried this in our past before. I personally think it didn't turn out that well, in fact, I'd call it one of the more shameful things we've done. But maybe you have a different perspective on it.
I think he’s saying the demographics of the group doesn’t matter, which is an answer to your question.
What should be done is a separate question, but I understand ac3r to be saying that he is in favour of the same action regardless of whom the people involved are.
I didn't ask the question, creative did. Also I don't feel that creative was asking the question because creative feels that it should be different, or even that ac3r would think it is different but instead to try and get ac3r to make a personal connection to the issue, because people very often are fine with abhorrent things right up until they have a personal connection to it.
And sure, it's laudable that ac3r sticks to his principles of forcible displacement regardless of the race of the people involved or whether they share a cultural identity with that group or not, it is still the case that ac3r is saying they are okay with forcible displacement of indigenous peoples.
And actually, I retract my "laudable" statement anyway, since again, the second half of ac3r's statement was an explicit outright lie. Nobody is saying the situation is fine, and we have explicitly said the opposite.

