11-20-2014, 12:34 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-20-2014, 12:37 AM by mbender123.)
Here are some renderings to more clearly illustrate the point:
![[Image: SCe5uoC.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/SCe5uoC.jpg)
In this one you can see that if their setback was only 6m (half of what is illustrated) then if a 25m separation was enforced, it would push the building on Arthur Place right off the properties (i.e. make it unfeasible)
![[Image: HcgXc6H.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/HcgXc6H.jpg)
your images do not show a 25 (12.5m and 12.5m) setback on the property to the right of arthur place? (79 vic i think ?)
![[Image: SCe5uoC.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/SCe5uoC.jpg)
In this one you can see that if their setback was only 6m (half of what is illustrated) then if a 25m separation was enforced, it would push the building on Arthur Place right off the properties (i.e. make it unfeasible)
![[Image: HcgXc6H.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/HcgXc6H.jpg)
your images do not show a 25 (12.5m and 12.5m) setback on the property to the right of arthur place? (79 vic i think ?)

