Grand River Transit

[plam]

Normally I would agree, but the "service everywhere, once every hour" has been such a total and utter failure whenever and wherever it has been tried that I think this is beyond the level of policy discussion.

We are not comparing two different alternatives each with its own virtues, we are talking a total failure against a service so successful it has to leave riders behind because buses are too full.

There was also the argument where someone pointed out that removing low-frequency buses just doesn't add that many buses compared to the number of buses running in high-frequency corridors, because, well, they're low-frequency buses and there just aren't that many of them.